Suppr超能文献

应对策略在区分饮食失调个体方面是否比饮食失调特征更有效?一项针对神经性厌食症和神经性贪食症女性住院患者的探索性研究。

Do coping strategies discriminate eating disordered individuals better than eating disorder features? An explorative study on female inpatients with anorexia and bulimia nervosa.

作者信息

Villa Valentina, Manzoni Gian Mauro, Pagnini Francesco, Castelnuovo Gianluca, Cesa Gian Luca, Molinari Enrico

机构信息

Psychology Research Laboratory, San Giuseppe Hospital, Istituto Auxologico Italiano IRCCS, 28824 Piancavallo, VB, Italy.

出版信息

J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2009 Dec;16(4):297-303. doi: 10.1007/s10880-009-9172-9. Epub 2009 Aug 14.

Abstract

The purpose of this explorative research was to examine how the COPE (Coping Orientation to Problem Experienced Inventory), an established instrument for measuring coping styles, and EDI-2 (Eating Disorder Inventory-2), a widely used questionnaire for assessing psychological and behavioural features of eating disorders (ED), discriminate among healthy individuals, inpatients with anorexia nervosa (AN) and inpatients with bulimia nervosa (BN). A discriminant analysis approach was used. Results showed that coping styles such as positive attitude, planning and social support are even more discriminative variables than eating disorder features. Implications for further studies are discussed.

摘要

这项探索性研究的目的是检验用于测量应对方式的既定工具——COPE(经历问题应对取向量表)以及广泛用于评估饮食失调(ED)心理和行为特征的问卷——EDI-2(饮食失调量表-2)如何区分健康个体、神经性厌食症(AN)住院患者和神经性贪食症(BN)住院患者。采用了判别分析方法。结果表明,诸如积极态度、计划和社会支持等应对方式比饮食失调特征更是具有区分性的变量。文中讨论了对进一步研究的启示。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验