Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Dental School of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009 Dec;20(12):1314-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01742.x. Epub 2009 Aug 4.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the retention force of an O-ring attachment system in different inclinations to the ideal path of insertion, using devices to compensate angulations.
Two implants were inserted into an aluminum base, and ball attachments were screwed to implants. Cylinders with O-rings were placed on ball attachments and connected to the test device using positioners to compensate implant angulations (0 degrees , 7 degrees , and 14 degrees ). Plexiglass bases were used to simulate implant angulations. The base and the test device were positioned in a testing apparatus, which simulated insertion/removal of an overdenture. A total of 2900 cycles, simulating 2 years of overdenture use, were performed and 36 O-rings were tested. The force required for each cycle was recorded with computer software. Longitudinal sections of ball attachment-positioner-cylinder with O-rings of each angulation were obtained to analyze the relationship among them, and O-ring sections tested in each angulation were compared with an unused counterpart. A mixed linear model was used to analyze the data, and the comparison was performed by orthogonal contrasts (alpha=0.05).
At 0 degrees , the retention force decreased significantly over time, and the retention force was significantly different in all comparisons, except from 12 to 18 months. When the implants were positioned at 7 degrees , the retention force was statistically different at 0 and 24 months. At 14 degrees , significant differences were found from 6 and 12 to 24 months.
Within the limitations of this study, it was concluded that O-rings for implant/attachments perpendicular to the occlusal plane were adequately retentive over the first year and that the retentive capacity of O-ring was affected by implant inclinations despite the proposed positioners.
本研究旨在评估在补偿角度的装置作用下,O 型环附着系统在不同与理想植入路径倾斜度下的固位力。
将两个种植体植入铝基底中,并将球附着体旋入种植体。将 O 型环圆柱体放在球附着体上,并使用定位器将其连接到测试装置,以补偿植入体角度(0 度、7 度和 14 度)。使用有机玻璃基底模拟植入体角度。基底和测试装置被定位在测试仪器中,该仪器模拟覆盖义齿的插入/移除。进行了总共 2900 个循环,模拟覆盖义齿使用 2 年,测试了 36 个 O 型环。每个循环所需的力由计算机软件记录。获得每个角度的球附着体-定位器-带 O 型环的圆柱体的纵向截面,以分析它们之间的关系,并将在每个角度测试的 O 型环截面与未使用的对照进行比较。使用混合线性模型分析数据,并通过正交对比(alpha=0.05)进行比较。
在 0 度时,固位力随时间显著下降,除了 12 至 18 个月外,所有比较的固位力均有显著差异。当植入物定位在 7 度时,在 0 和 24 个月时保留力存在统计学差异。在 14 度时,从 6 个月到 12 个月至 24 个月发现有显著差异。
在本研究的限制范围内,可以得出结论,与咬合平面垂直的植入物/附着体的 O 型环在前一年具有足够的固位力,尽管有定位器,但 O 型环的固位能力受到植入体倾斜度的影响。