• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

T1N0M0期乳腺癌的预后与辅助治疗的圣加仑风险评估标准的关系

Outcome of T1N0M0 breast cancer in relation to St. Gallen risk assignment criteria for adjuvant therapy.

作者信息

Garassino I, Gullo G, Orefice S, Tondulli L, Masci G, Salvini P, Eboli M, Di Tommaso L, Giordano L, Alloisio M, Roncalli M, Santoro A

机构信息

Department of Oncology and Hematology, Istituto Clinico Humanitas IRCCS, 20089 Rozzano (Milano), Italy.

出版信息

Breast. 2009 Aug;18(4):263-6. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2009.07.003. Epub 2009 Aug 13.

DOI:10.1016/j.breast.2009.07.003
PMID:19682903
Abstract

T1N0M0 (stage I) breast cancer (BC) has been increasing in recent decades but the optimal adjuvant approach remains controversial. To assess the outcome of BC patients stratified and treated with multimodal therapies according to St. Gallen consensus meeting recommendations, we retrospectively evaluated an unselected cohort of T1N0M0 BC patients, with respect to the St. Gallen criteria. At a median follow-up of 5 years, the recurrence rate, recurrence-free survival and overall survival were 7%, 94% and 96% respectively, and 60% of relapses were locoregional. No statistically significant difference was observed between T1a,b/T1c groups, or among risk categories (high/intermediate/low). The very low rate of distant recurrences even in patients with unfavorable prognostic factors seems to support the use of adjuvant systemic therapies but better prognostic and predictive factors are strongly needed for this subset of patients.

摘要

近几十年来,T1N0M0(I期)乳腺癌(BC)的发病率一直在上升,但最佳辅助治疗方法仍存在争议。为了评估根据圣加仑共识会议建议进行分层并接受多模式治疗的BC患者的预后,我们根据圣加仑标准对一组未经选择的T1N0M0 BC患者进行了回顾性评估。在中位随访5年时,复发率、无复发生存率和总生存率分别为7%、94%和96%,60%的复发为局部区域复发。在T1a、b/T1c组之间或风险类别(高/中/低)之间未观察到统计学上的显著差异。即使在具有不良预后因素的患者中,远处复发率也非常低,这似乎支持使用辅助性全身治疗,但对于这部分患者,迫切需要更好的预后和预测因素。

相似文献

1
Outcome of T1N0M0 breast cancer in relation to St. Gallen risk assignment criteria for adjuvant therapy.T1N0M0期乳腺癌的预后与辅助治疗的圣加仑风险评估标准的关系
Breast. 2009 Aug;18(4):263-6. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2009.07.003. Epub 2009 Aug 13.
2
Clinical outcome of breast conservation therapy for breast cancer in Hong Kong: prognostic impact of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence and 2005 St. Gallen risk categories.香港乳腺癌保乳治疗的临床结果:同侧乳腺肿瘤复发及2005年圣加仑风险分类的预后影响。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007 Jul 1;68(3):667-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.12.043. Epub 2007 Mar 26.
3
Ki-67 expression gives additional prognostic information on St. Gallen 2007 and Adjuvant! Online risk categories in early breast cancer.Ki-67表达为2007年圣加仑会议及辅助治疗!在线乳腺癌风险分类提供了额外的预后信息。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2009 May;16(5):1112-21. doi: 10.1245/s10434-009-0334-7. Epub 2009 Feb 14.
4
Improved survival for women with stage I breast cancer in south-east Sweden: a comparison between two time periods before and after increased use of adjuvant systemic therapy.瑞典东南部I期乳腺癌女性患者生存率提高:辅助性全身治疗使用增加前后两个时间段的比较
Acta Oncol. 2009;48(4):504-13. doi: 10.1080/02841860902718754.
5
Evaluation of the prognostic value of 2005 St Gallen risk categories for operated breast cancers in Hong Kong.评估2005年圣加仑风险分类对香港接受手术治疗的乳腺癌的预后价值。
Breast. 2008 Feb;17(1):58-63. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2007.06.007. Epub 2007 Sep 4.
6
Prediction of local recurrence, distant metastases, and death after breast-conserving therapy in early-stage invasive breast cancer using a five-biomarker panel.使用五生物标志物组合预测早期浸润性乳腺癌保乳治疗后的局部复发、远处转移和死亡情况。
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Oct 1;27(28):4701-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.21.7075. Epub 2009 Aug 31.
7
Outcome differences between patients with node-negative breast cancer classified according to the st. Gallen risk categories.根据圣加仑风险分类,淋巴结阴性乳腺癌患者的预后差异。
Clin Breast Cancer. 2009 Nov;9(4):231-6. doi: 10.3816/CBC.2009.n.039.
8
Cell cycle dysregulation influences survival in high risk breast cancer patients.细胞周期失调影响高危乳腺癌患者的生存。
Cancer Invest. 2008 Aug;26(7):734-40. doi: 10.1080/07357900801944864.
9
Patterns and predictors of early recurrence in postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor-positive early breast cancer.雌激素受体阳性早期乳腺癌绝经后女性早期复发的模式及预测因素
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009 Sep;117(1):91-8. doi: 10.1007/s10549-008-0291-z. Epub 2008 Dec 27.
10
Use of the St Gallen classification for patients with node-negative breast cancer may lead to overuse of adjuvant chemotherapy.对淋巴结阴性乳腺癌患者使用圣加仑分类法可能会导致辅助化疗的过度使用。
Br J Surg. 2002 Jun;89(6):789-96. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.2002.02113.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Unveiling the paradigm shift: systemic treatment strategies in small, node-negative breast cancer.揭示范式转变:小的、无淋巴结转移乳腺癌的全身治疗策略
NPJ Breast Cancer. 2025 May 16;11(1):44. doi: 10.1038/s41523-025-00761-8.
2
Molecular Subtype May Be More Associated With Prognosis and Chemotherapy Benefit Than Tumor Size in T1N0 Breast Cancer Patients: An Analysis of 2,168 Patients for Possible De-Escalation Treatment.在T1N0期乳腺癌患者中,分子亚型可能比肿瘤大小更能影响预后及化疗获益:对2168例患者进行可能的降阶梯治疗分析
Front Oncol. 2021 Feb 19;11:636266. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.636266. eCollection 2021.
3
Do 21-Gene Recurrence Score Influence Chemotherapy Decisions in T1bN0 Breast Cancer Patients?
21基因复发评分对T1bN0期乳腺癌患者的化疗决策有影响吗?
Front Oncol. 2020 May 12;10:708. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00708. eCollection 2020.
4
Luminal-like HER2-negative stage IA breast cancer: a multicenter retrospective study on long-term outcome with propensity score analysis.管腔样HER2阴性IA期乳腺癌:一项采用倾向评分分析的长期结局多中心回顾性研究。
Oncotarget. 2017 Nov 24;8(68):112816-112824. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.22643. eCollection 2017 Dec 22.
5
Characteristics and clinical outcome of T1 breast cancer: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.T1期乳腺癌的特征与临床结局:一项多中心回顾性队列研究
Ann Oncol. 2014 Mar;25(3):623-628. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdt532. Epub 2014 Jan 7.
6
Recurrence risk in small, node-negative, early breast cancer: a multicenter retrospective analysis.小的、淋巴结阴性、早期乳腺癌的复发风险:多中心回顾性分析。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2013 May;139(5):853-60. doi: 10.1007/s00432-013-1388-2. Epub 2013 Feb 15.