Stephenson Andrew J, Wood David P, Kattan Michael W, Klein Eric A, Scardino Peter T, Eastham James A, Carver Brett S
Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
J Urol. 2009 Oct;182(4):1357-63. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.06.046. Epub 2009 Aug 14.
Positive surgical margins increase the risk of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy by 2 to 4-fold. The risk of biochemical recurrence may be influenced by the anatomical location and extent of positive surgical margins. In a multicenter study we analyzed the predictive usefulness of several subclassifications of positive surgical margins.
The clinical information and followup data of 7,160 patients treated with radical prostatectomy alone at 1 of 3 institutions between 1995 and 2006 were modeled using Cox proportional hazards regression analysis for biochemical recurrence. Positive surgical margins were analyzed as solitary vs multiple, focal vs extensive and apical location vs other. The usefulness of these subclassifications was assessed by the improvement in predictive accuracy of nomograms containing these parameters compared to one in which the surgical margin was modeled simply as positive vs negative.
The 7-year progression-free probability was 60% in patients with positive surgical margins. A positive surgical margin was significantly associated with biochemical recurrence (HR 2.3, p <0.001) after adjusting for age, prostate specific antigen, pathological Gleason score, pathological stage and year of surgery. An increased risk of biochemical recurrence was associated with multiple vs solitary positive surgical margins (adjusted HR 1.4, p = 0.002) and extensive vs focal positive surgical margins (adjusted HR 1.3, p = 0.004) on multivariable analysis. However, neither parameter improved the predictive accuracy of a nomogram compared to one in which surgical margin status was modeled as positive vs negative (concordance index 0.851 vs 0.850 vs 0.850).
The number and extent of positive surgical margin significantly influence the risk of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. However, the empirical prognostic usefulness of subclassifications of positive surgical margins is limited.
手术切缘阳性会使根治性前列腺切除术后生化复发风险增加2至4倍。生化复发风险可能受手术切缘阳性的解剖位置和范围影响。在一项多中心研究中,我们分析了手术切缘阳性的几种亚分类的预测效用。
对1995年至2006年间在3家机构之一仅接受根治性前列腺切除术的7160例患者的临床信息和随访数据,采用Cox比例风险回归分析评估生化复发情况。手术切缘阳性按单发与多发、局灶性与广泛性以及尖部位置与其他位置进行分析。通过比较包含这些参数的列线图与仅将手术切缘简单分为阳性与阴性的列线图的预测准确性改善情况,评估这些亚分类的效用。
手术切缘阳性患者的7年无进展概率为60%。在调整年龄、前列腺特异性抗原、病理Gleason评分、病理分期和手术年份后,手术切缘阳性与生化复发显著相关(风险比2.3,p<0.001)。多变量分析显示,多发手术切缘阳性与单发手术切缘阳性相比(调整后风险比1.4,p = 0.002)以及广泛性手术切缘阳性与局灶性手术切缘阳性相比(调整后风险比1.3,p = 0.004),生化复发风险增加。然而,与将手术切缘状态简单分为阳性与阴性的列线图相比,这两个参数均未提高列线图的预测准确性(一致性指数分别为0.851、0.850和0.850)。
手术切缘阳性的数量和范围显著影响根治性前列腺切除术后生化复发风险。然而,手术切缘阳性亚分类的经验性预后效用有限。