• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

根治性前列腺切除术后阳性切缘参数和病理分期对生化复发的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。

The impact of positive surgical margin parameters and pathological stage on biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Urology, First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China.

First College of Clinical Medicine, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2024 Jul 11;19(7):e0301653. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301653. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0301653
PMID:38990870
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11239040/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To systematically review and perform a meta-analysis on the predictive value of the primary Gleason grade (PGG) at the positive surgical margin (PSM), length of PSM, number of PSMs, and pathological stage of the primary tumor on biochemical recurrence (BCR) in patients with prostate cancer (PCa) after radical prostatectomy (RP).

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed using electronic databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science, from January 1, 2005, to October 1, 2023. The protocol was pre-registered in PROSPERO. Subgroup analyses were performed according to the different treatments and study outcomes. Pooled hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals were extracted from multivariate analyses, and a fixed or random effect model was used to pool the estimates. Subgroup analyses were performed to explore the reasons for the heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Thirty-one studies that included 50,028 patients with PCa were eligible for this meta-analysis. The results showed that, compared to PGG3, PGG4/5 was associated with a significantly increased risk of BCR. Compared with PSM ≤3 mm, PSM ≥3 mm was associated with a significantly increased risk of BCR. Compared with unifocal PSM, multifocal PSM (mF-PSM) was associated with a significantly increased risk of BCR. In addition, pT >2 was associated with a significantly increased risk of BCR compared to pT2. Notably, the findings were found to be reliable based on the sensitivity and subgroup analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

PGG at the PSM, length of PSM, number of PSMs, and pathological stage of the primary tumor in patients with PCa were found to be associated with a significantly increased risk of BCR. Thus, patients with these factors should be treated differently in terms of receiving adjunct treatment and more frequent monitoring. Large-scale, well-designed prospective studies with longer follow-up periods are needed to validate the efficacy of these risk factors and their effects on patient responses to adjuvant and salvage therapies and other oncological outcomes.

摘要

背景

系统回顾并进行荟萃分析,评估前列腺癌(PCa)患者根治性前列腺切除术后(RP)在阳性切缘(PSM)、PSM 长度、PSM 数量和原发肿瘤病理分期的主要 Gleason 分级(PGG)对生化复发(BCR)的预测价值。

方法

使用电子数据库(包括 PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane 图书馆和 Web of Science)从 2005 年 1 月 1 日至 2023 年 10 月 1 日进行系统文献检索。方案在 PROSPERO 中预先注册。根据不同的治疗方法和研究结果进行亚组分析。从多变量分析中提取具有 95%置信区间的合并风险比,并使用固定或随机效应模型合并估计值。进行亚组分析以探讨异质性的原因。

结果

共有 31 项研究纳入了 50028 例 PCa 患者,符合本荟萃分析的纳入标准。结果表明,与 PGG3 相比,PGG4/5 与 BCR 的风险显著增加相关。与 PSM≤3mm 相比,PSM≥3mm 与 BCR 的风险显著增加相关。与单灶 PSM 相比,多灶 PSM(mF-PSM)与 BCR 的风险显著增加相关。此外,与 pT2 相比,pT>2 与 BCR 的风险显著增加相关。值得注意的是,敏感性分析和亚组分析结果表明这些发现是可靠的。

结论

在 PCa 患者中,PSM 处的 PGG、PSM 长度、PSM 数量和原发肿瘤病理分期与 BCR 的风险显著增加相关。因此,对于具有这些因素的患者,在接受辅助治疗和更频繁的监测方面应采取不同的治疗方法。需要进行大规模、精心设计的前瞻性研究,以验证这些风险因素的疗效及其对辅助和挽救治疗及其他肿瘤学结局的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f2a/11239040/536930ae62d9/pone.0301653.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f2a/11239040/145447230c6d/pone.0301653.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f2a/11239040/8a824ebda7b1/pone.0301653.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f2a/11239040/10c8a4a0e30e/pone.0301653.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f2a/11239040/3469dc5cb6f5/pone.0301653.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f2a/11239040/536930ae62d9/pone.0301653.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f2a/11239040/145447230c6d/pone.0301653.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f2a/11239040/8a824ebda7b1/pone.0301653.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f2a/11239040/10c8a4a0e30e/pone.0301653.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f2a/11239040/3469dc5cb6f5/pone.0301653.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f2a/11239040/536930ae62d9/pone.0301653.g005.jpg

相似文献

1
The impact of positive surgical margin parameters and pathological stage on biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.根治性前列腺切除术后阳性切缘参数和病理分期对生化复发的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 11;19(7):e0301653. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301653. eCollection 2024.
2
Primary Gleason grade and Gleason grade group at positive surgical margins: a systematic review and meta-analysis.手术切缘阳性时的原发性Gleason分级和Gleason分级组:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
BJU Int. 2021 May;127 Suppl 1:13-22. doi: 10.1111/bju.15316.
3
Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate-specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy in adjuvant treatment-naïve patients.辅助治疗初治患者根治性前列腺切除术后切缘阳性对前列腺特异抗原失败的影响。
BJU Int. 2011 Jun;107(11):1748-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09728.x. Epub 2010 Sep 30.
4
Impact of positive surgical margin length and Gleason grade at the margin on biochemical recurrence in patients with organ-confined prostate cancer.切缘阳性长度和边缘处 Gleason 分级对局限期前列腺癌患者生化复发的影响。
Prostate. 2019 Dec;79(16):1832-1836. doi: 10.1002/pros.23908. Epub 2019 Sep 25.
5
The impact of the extent and location of positive surgical margins on the risk of biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy in men with Gleason 7 prostate cancers.在 Gleason 7 级前列腺癌男性患者中,手术切缘阳性的范围和位置对根治性前列腺切除术后生化复发风险的影响。
Prostate. 2021 Dec;81(16):1428-1434. doi: 10.1002/pros.24240. Epub 2021 Sep 27.
6
Positive surgical margin is associated with biochemical recurrence risk following radical prostatectomy: a meta-analysis from high-quality retrospective cohort studies.阳性切缘与根治性前列腺切除术后生化复发风险相关:来自高质量回顾性队列研究的荟萃分析。
World J Surg Oncol. 2018 Jul 3;16(1):124. doi: 10.1186/s12957-018-1433-3.
7
Positive margin length and highest Gleason grade of tumor at the margin predict for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy in patients with organ-confined prostate cancer.在局限于器官的前列腺癌患者中,切缘处肿瘤的阳性切缘长度和最高 Gleason 分级可预测根治性前列腺切除术后的生化复发。
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2018 Jun;21(2):221-227. doi: 10.1038/s41391-017-0019-4. Epub 2017 Dec 11.
8
Prognostic Value of Gleason Score at Positive Surgical Margin in Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.前列腺癌手术切缘阳性时Gleason评分的预后价值:一项系统评价和Meta分析
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2020 Oct;18(5):e517-e522. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2020.02.011. Epub 2020 Mar 4.
9
The impact of length and location of positive margins in predicting biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with a minimum follow-up of 5 years.在机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后,至少随访 5 年,阳性切缘的长度和位置对预测生化复发的影响。
BJU Int. 2015 Jan;115(1):106-13. doi: 10.1111/bju.12483.
10
Impact of positive surgical margin length and Gleason grade at the margin on oncologic outcomes in patients with nonorgan-confined prostate cancer.阳性切缘长度和切缘处 Gleason 分级对非器官受限前列腺癌患者肿瘤学结局的影响。
Prostate. 2022 Jun;82(9):949-956. doi: 10.1002/pros.24341. Epub 2022 Mar 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of Surgical Margin Control in Index Tumors on Prognosis After Radical Prostatectomy: A Focus on Zonal Origin.根治性前列腺切除术后,原发肿瘤手术切缘控制对预后的影响:以区域起源为重点
Curr Oncol. 2025 Aug 7;32(8):445. doi: 10.3390/curroncol32080445.
2
Comment on "Comparing outcomes of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy by specialists and trainees using a modular training approach".关于“采用模块化培训方法比较专科医生和实习医生进行机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的结果”的评论
J Robot Surg. 2025 May 24;19(1):234. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02411-4.
3
Fluorescence confocal microscopy for margin assessment in prostatectomy: IP8-FLUORESCE study protocol.

本文引用的文献

1
Visual extended reality tools in image-guided surgery in urology: a systematic review.视觉扩展现实工具在泌尿外科图像引导手术中的应用:系统评价。
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2024 Aug;51(10):3109-3134. doi: 10.1007/s00259-024-06699-6. Epub 2024 Apr 9.
2
Three-dimensional automatic artificial intelligence driven augmented-reality selective biopsy during nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: A feasibility and accuracy study.三维自动人工智能驱动的增强现实选择性活检在保留神经机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术中的应用:一项可行性与准确性研究
Asian J Urol. 2023 Oct;10(4):407-415. doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2023.08.001. Epub 2023 Aug 10.
3
用于前列腺切除术中切缘评估的荧光共聚焦显微镜检查:IP8-FLUORESCE研究方案。
BJU Int. 2025 Mar;135(3):502-509. doi: 10.1111/bju.16588. Epub 2024 Nov 16.
A Systematic Review of New Imaging Technologies for Robotic Prostatectomy: From Molecular Imaging to Augmented Reality.
机器人前列腺切除术新成像技术的系统评价:从分子成像到增强现实
J Clin Med. 2023 Aug 21;12(16):5425. doi: 10.3390/jcm12165425.
4
Prognostic differences among the positive surgical margin locations following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in a large Japanese cohort (the MSUG94 group).在一个大型日本队列(MSUG94 组)中,机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后阳性切缘位置的预后差异。
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2023 Apr 29;53(5):443-451. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyad004.
5
Confocal laser microscopy for assessment of surgical margins during radical prostatectomy.共聚焦激光显微镜在根治性前列腺切除术中评估手术切缘的应用。
BJU Int. 2023 Jul;132(1):40-46. doi: 10.1111/bju.15938. Epub 2022 Dec 18.
6
"Augmented reality" applications in urology: a systematic review.增强现实技术在泌尿外科中的应用:系统评价。
Minerva Urol Nephrol. 2022 Oct;74(5):528-537. doi: 10.23736/S2724-6051.22.04726-7. Epub 2022 Apr 6.
7
Impact of positive surgical margin on biochemical recurrence in localized prostate cancer.手术切缘阳性对局限性前列腺癌生化复发的影响。
Prostate Int. 2021 Sep;9(3):151-156. doi: 10.1016/j.prnil.2020.12.004. Epub 2021 Mar 9.
8
Clinical utility of subclassifying positive surgical margins at radical prostatectomy.在根治性前列腺切除术中对阳性手术切缘进行亚分类的临床实用性。
BJU Int. 2022 Feb;129(2):194-200. doi: 10.1111/bju.15524. Epub 2021 Jul 11.
9
Predictive Factors for Positive Surgical Margins in Patients With Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.前列腺癌根治术后切缘阳性的预测因素:一项系统评价和Meta分析
Front Oncol. 2021 Feb 8;10:539592. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.539592. eCollection 2020.
10
Surgical management of high-risk, localized prostate cancer.高危局限性前列腺癌的手术治疗
Nat Rev Urol. 2020 Dec;17(12):679-690. doi: 10.1038/s41585-020-00384-7. Epub 2020 Nov 10.