Suppr超能文献

中分子量血液透析滤过:使用同种聚芳醚膜与前稀释和后稀释模式的比较。

Mid-dilution hemodiafiltration: a comparison with pre- and postdilution modes using the same polyphenylene membrane.

机构信息

Department of Nephrology, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Blood Purif. 2009;28(3):268-74. doi: 10.1159/000232935. Epub 2009 Aug 14.

Abstract

As a change from Diapes to polyphenylene membrane in the mid-dilution filter has recently been developed, the aim of this study was to compare mid-dilution using this new dialyzer versus pre- and postdilution. The prospective study included 20 patients who underwent 4 hemodiafiltration (HDF) sessions: 1.7 m(2) polyphenylene and predilution infusion flow (Qi) 200 ml/min, 1.7 m(2) and postdilution Qi 100 ml/min, 1.9 and 2.2 m(2) mid-dilution both with Qi 200 ml/ min. The urea and creatinine reduction ratios were slightly higher in postdilution. The beta(2)-microglobulin (85.8%), myoglobin (73.6%), prolactin (67.8%) and retinol-binding protein (29.2%) reduction ratios with 1.9 m(2) mid-dilution, which was similar to 2.2 m(2) mid-dilution, were significantly higher than with the post- and predilution modes. Mid-dilution appears to be a good HDF alternative that allows a better removal of larger molecules than postdilution and, mainly, predilution. Mid-dilution using 1.9 or 2.2 m(2) dialyzers, at the same convective volume, showed a similar removal.

摘要

最近,中稀释过滤器已从 Diapes 改为聚苯并咪唑膜,本研究旨在比较使用这种新透析器的中稀释与预稀释和后稀释。前瞻性研究包括 20 名接受 4 次血液透析滤过(HDF)治疗的患者:1.7 m²聚苯并咪唑膜,预稀释输注流量(Qi)为 200 ml/min,1.7 m²和后稀释 Qi 为 100 ml/min,1.9 和 2.2 m²中稀释,Qi 均为 200 ml/min。后稀释的尿素和肌酐清除率略高。1.9 m²中稀释的β2-微球蛋白(85.8%)、肌红蛋白(73.6%)、催乳素(67.8%)和视黄醇结合蛋白(29.2%)清除率与 2.2 m²中稀释相似,明显高于后稀释和预稀释模式。中稀释似乎是一种很好的 HDF 替代方法,可更好地清除较大分子,优于后稀释,主要优于预稀释。使用 1.9 或 2.2 m²透析器进行中稀释,在相同的对流体积下,清除效果相似。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验