Gupta Ajay, Swaroop Chetanya, Agarwala Sandeep, Pandey Ravindra Mohan, Bakhshi Sameer
Department of Medical Oncology, Institute Rotary Cancer Hospital, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2009 Sep;31(9):635-41. doi: 10.1097/MPH.0b013e3181acd8cd.
Outpatient oral therapy is infrequently used in pediatric low-risk febrile neutropenia (LRFN) as there is insufficient data regarding its equivalence as compared with parenteral therapy.
This is a single institutional, randomized control trial in pediatric LRFN aged 2 to 15 years, in which 123 episodes in 88 patients were randomized to outpatient oral ofloxacin 7.5 mg/kg 12 hourly and amoxycillin-clavulanate 12.5 mg/kg 8 hourly or outpatient intravenous (IV) ceftriaxone 75 mg/kg and amikacin 15 mg/kg once daily after blood cultures.
Out of 119 evaluable episodes, one-third were leukemia patients in maintenance and rest were solid tumors. Success was achieved in 55/61 (90.16%) and 54/58 (93.1%) in oral and IV arms, respectively, (P=0.56). There were 3 hospitalizations but no mortality. Median days to resolution of fever, absolute neutrophil count >500/mm(3) and antibiotic use were 3, 5, and 6 days in both arms. There were 5 blood culture isolates (3 gram-positive and 2 gram-negative bacteria). Failure of outpatient therapy was associated with perianal infections, bacteremia, febrile neutropenia onset before day 9 of chemotherapy in solid tumors and Vincristine, actinomycin-D, and cyclophosphamide chemotherapy for rhabdomyosarcoma. All gram-positive isolates were successes, whereas both gram-negative isolates were failures. Diarrhea in IV arm and Vincristine, actinomycin-D, and cyclophosphamide chemotherapy in the oral arm predicted failure in subgroup analysis.
Outpatient therapy is efficacious and safe in pediatric LRFN. There was no difference in outcome in oral versus IV outpatient therapy. Amoxycillin-clavulanate and ofloxacin may be the oral regimen of choice.
门诊口服治疗在儿科低危发热性中性粒细胞减少症(LRFN)中很少使用,因为与肠外治疗相比,关于其等效性的数据不足。
这是一项针对2至15岁儿科LRFN患者的单机构随机对照试验,88例患者的123次发作被随机分为门诊口服氧氟沙星7.5mg/kg,每12小时一次,阿莫西林-克拉维酸12.5mg/kg,每8小时一次,或门诊静脉注射(IV)头孢曲松75mg/kg和阿米卡星15mg/kg,每日一次,血培养后进行。
在119次可评估发作中,三分之一为维持期白血病患者,其余为实体瘤患者。口服组和静脉注射组分别有55/61(90.16%)和54/58(93.1%)取得成功,(P=0.56)。有3例住院但无死亡病例。两组发热消退、绝对中性粒细胞计数>500/mm³和抗生素使用的中位天数均为3天、5天和6天。有5份血培养分离株(3株革兰氏阳性菌和2株革兰氏阴性菌)。门诊治疗失败与肛周感染、菌血症、实体瘤化疗第9天前发热性中性粒细胞减少症发作以及横纹肌肉瘤的长春新碱、放线菌素-D和环磷酰胺化疗有关。所有革兰氏阳性分离株均成功,而2株革兰氏阴性分离株均失败。静脉注射组的腹泻和口服组的长春新碱、放线菌素-D和环磷酰胺化疗在亚组分析中预示失败。
门诊治疗在儿科LRFN中有效且安全。口服与静脉门诊治疗的结果无差异。阿莫西林-克拉维酸和氧氟沙星可能是首选的口服方案。