• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

认知控制的自动性:反应抑制范式中的目标启动

Automaticity of cognitive control: goal priming in response-inhibition paradigms.

作者信息

Verbruggen Frederick, Logan Gordon D

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2009 Sep;35(5):1381-8. doi: 10.1037/a0016645.

DOI:10.1037/a0016645
PMID:19686032
Abstract

Response inhibition is a hallmark of cognitive control. An executive system inhibits responses by activating a stop goal when a stop signal is presented. The authors asked whether the stop goal could be primed by task-irrelevant information in stop-signal and go/no-go paradigms. In Experiment 1, the task-irrelevant primes GO, ###, or STOP were presented in the go stimulus. Go performance was slower for STOP than for ### or GO. This suggests that the stop goal was primed by task-irrelevant information. In Experiment 2, STOP primed the stop goal only in conditions in which the goal was relevant to the task context. In Experiment 3, GO, ###, or STOP were presented as stop signals. Stop performance was slower for GO than for ### or STOP. These findings suggest that task goals can be primed and that response inhibition and executive control can be influenced by automatic processing.

摘要

反应抑制是认知控制的一个标志。当呈现停止信号时,执行系统通过激活停止目标来抑制反应。作者们探讨了在停止信号和去/不去范式中,停止目标是否会被与任务无关的信息所启动。在实验1中,与任务无关的启动刺激“去”“###”或“停止”呈现在去刺激中。对于“停止”启动刺激,去反应的表现比对“###”或“去”启动刺激更慢。这表明停止目标被与任务无关的信息所启动。在实验2中,只有在目标与任务情境相关的条件下,“停止”才启动了停止目标。在实验3中,“去”“###”或“停止”被呈现为停止信号。对于“去”停止信号,停止反应的表现比对“###”或“停止”信号更慢。这些发现表明任务目标可以被启动,并且反应抑制和执行控制会受到自动加工的影响。

相似文献

1
Automaticity of cognitive control: goal priming in response-inhibition paradigms.认知控制的自动性:反应抑制范式中的目标启动
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2009 Sep;35(5):1381-8. doi: 10.1037/a0016645.
2
Equivalency of reaction times for simple and primed tasks.简单任务和启动任务的反应时间等效性。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2007 Jul;125(3):291-300. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2006.08.005. Epub 2006 Oct 23.
3
The remains of the trial: goal-determined inter-trial suppression of selective attention.试验的剩余部分:目标确定的选择性注意的试验间抑制
Prog Brain Res. 2009;176:195-213. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(09)17611-2.
4
The interplay of stop signal inhibition and inhibition of return.停止信号抑制与返回抑制之间的相互作用。
Q J Exp Psychol A. 2003 Nov;56(8):1349-71. doi: 10.1080/02724980343000099.
5
Probability effects in the stop-signal paradigm: the insula and the significance of failed inhibition.停止信号范式中的概率效应:脑岛与抑制失败的意义。
Brain Res. 2006 Aug 11;1105(1):143-54. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.02.091. Epub 2006 Apr 17.
6
Post-stop-signal adjustments: inhibition improves subsequent inhibition.信号灯后反应调整:抑制作用增强后续抑制作用。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2012 Jul;38(4):955-66. doi: 10.1037/a0026778. Epub 2012 Jan 23.
7
Comparative analysis of event-related potentials during Go/NoGo and CPT: decomposition of electrophysiological markers of response inhibition and sustained attention.Go/NoGo任务与连续性能测试中事件相关电位的比较分析:反应抑制和持续注意力的电生理标记物分解
Brain Res. 2006 Aug 9;1104(1):114-28. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.03.010. Epub 2006 Jul 7.
8
Attention for action during error correction.
Prog Brain Res. 2009;176:227-44. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(09)17613-6.
9
Two types of action error: electrophysiological evidence for separable inhibitory and sustained attention neural mechanisms producing error on go/no-go tasks.两种类型的动作错误:关于在执行/不执行任务中产生错误的可分离抑制性和持续性注意神经机制的电生理证据。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2009 Jan;21(1):93-104. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21008.
10
Task switching and shifting between stopping and going: Developmental change in between-trial control adjustments.任务切换和停止与启动之间的转换:试验间控制调整中的发展变化。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2011 Mar;108(3):484-503. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2010.10.004. Epub 2010 Nov 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Brain-wide associations of reaction time variability in the ABCD study.ABCD研究中反应时间变异性的全脑关联
Imaging Neurosci (Camb). 2025 May 28;3. doi: 10.1162/IMAG.a.18. eCollection 2025.
2
Causal computations of supplementary motor area on spatial impulsivity.补充运动区对空间冲动性的因果计算。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 24;14(1):17040. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-67673-8.
3
Cognitive control training with domain-general response inhibition does not change children's brains or behavior.认知控制训练与领域一般性反应抑制并不能改变儿童的大脑或行为。
Nat Neurosci. 2024 Jul;27(7):1364-1375. doi: 10.1038/s41593-024-01672-w. Epub 2024 Jun 4.
4
A differential impact of action-effect temporal contiguity on different measures of response inhibition in the Go\No-Go and Stop-signal paradigms.在 Go/No-Go 和停止信号范式中,动作-效应时间连续性对不同反应抑制测量指标的影响存在差异。
Psychol Res. 2024 Jun;88(4):1157-1168. doi: 10.1007/s00426-024-01931-2. Epub 2024 Mar 7.
5
Stop affordance task: a measure of the motor interference effect.停止赋予任务:一种衡量运动干扰效应的方法。
Cogn Process. 2024 May;25(2):259-266. doi: 10.1007/s10339-023-01172-y. Epub 2023 Dec 7.
6
Action-rule-based cognitive control enables efficient execution of stimulus-response conflict tasks: a model validation of Simon task performance.基于动作规则的认知控制能够有效执行刺激-反应冲突任务:西蒙任务表现的模型验证
Front Hum Neurosci. 2023 Nov 16;17:1239207. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2023.1239207. eCollection 2023.
7
EXAMINING MECHANISMS OF CHILDHOOD COGNITIVE CONTROL.探究儿童认知控制机制
J Cogn. 2023 Aug 25;6(1):50. doi: 10.5334/joc.314. eCollection 2023.
8
Do after "not to do": Deinhibition in cognitive control.做之后的“不做”:认知控制中的去抑制。
Mem Cognit. 2023 Aug;51(6):1388-1403. doi: 10.3758/s13421-023-01403-9. Epub 2023 Feb 28.
9
Statistical Nonparametric fMRI Maps in the Analysis of Response Inhibition in Abstinent Individuals with History of Alcohol Use Disorder.统计非参数功能磁共振成像图谱在有酒精使用障碍史的戒酒个体反应抑制分析中的应用
Behav Sci (Basel). 2022 Apr 21;12(5):121. doi: 10.3390/bs12050121.
10
Enhancing Enneagram Therapy with Contemporary Research on the Conscious and Unconscious Mind.增强九型人格疗法与当代意识和无意识心智研究。
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2024 Jun;58(2):711-730. doi: 10.1007/s12124-022-09685-5. Epub 2022 Apr 6.