• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Attention for action during error correction.

作者信息

Sharika K M, Ray Supriya, Murthy Aditya

机构信息

National Brain Research Centre, Nainwal More, Manesar, Haryana, India.

出版信息

Prog Brain Res. 2009;176:227-44. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(09)17613-6.

DOI:10.1016/S0079-6123(09)17613-6
PMID:19733760
Abstract

While the role of attention in selecting visual attributes is well acknowledged, relatively less is known about the mechanisms that facilitate the selection of actions during goal-directed behaviors. The notion of an executive attention has provided a particularly fruitful framework to understand how the brain coordinates the selection of appropriate modules in a sequence that optimizes behavior. However, to do this, theorists have recognized the need to parcel out this unitary system into subcomponents. Two modules that have been commonly invoked are performance monitoring and response inhibition. Visuomotor control of eye movements provides an elegant model system to investigate these mechanisms of selection and control specially occurring during "double-step" tasks in which goals are suddenly changed, demanding inhibition and error detection/correction. Here, we describe our work that has focused on the executive mechanisms that regulate the production of saccadic movements during double-step tasks in different cognitive contexts and target-shift double-step tasks. By examining the pattern of response in the context of quantitative models of saccadic reaction times, we provide behavioral evidence of predictive error correction that produces fast, corrective responses. The predictions from these behavioral experiments were also tested and supported by analyzing neural data from the frontal cortex of monkeys performing similar tasks. Finally, we present data that tested the possibility of an interaction between the inhibitory control and error correction and suggest a model in which predictive error correction may be engaged when the likelihood of error is high. We propose that these results when used in conjunction with electrophysiological recordings, may provide an important approach to understand how error detection/correction and inhibition, two vital cogs in the functioning of executive control, may interact to govern goal-directed behaviors.

摘要

相似文献

1
Attention for action during error correction.
Prog Brain Res. 2009;176:227-44. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(09)17613-6.
2
Control of predictive error correction during a saccadic double-step task.扫视双步任务期间预测误差校正的控制
J Neurophysiol. 2008 Nov;100(5):2757-70. doi: 10.1152/jn.90238.2008. Epub 2008 Sep 24.
3
Automaticity of cognitive control: goal priming in response-inhibition paradigms.认知控制的自动性:反应抑制范式中的目标启动
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2009 Sep;35(5):1381-8. doi: 10.1037/a0016645.
4
Two types of action error: electrophysiological evidence for separable inhibitory and sustained attention neural mechanisms producing error on go/no-go tasks.两种类型的动作错误:关于在执行/不执行任务中产生错误的可分离抑制性和持续性注意神经机制的电生理证据。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2009 Jan;21(1):93-104. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21008.
5
Time course of attentional modulation in the frontal eye field during curve tracing.曲线追踪过程中额叶眼区注意力调节的时间进程。
J Neurophysiol. 2009 Apr;101(4):1813-22. doi: 10.1152/jn.91050.2008. Epub 2009 Jan 28.
6
Spatio-temporal brain dynamics underlying saccade execution, suppression, and error-related feedback.扫视执行、抑制及错误相关反馈背后的时空脑动力学。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2007 Mar;19(3):420-32. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2007.19.3.420.
7
Dynamic interaction between "Go" and "Stop" signals in the saccadic eye movement system: New evidence against the functional independence of the underlying neural mechanisms.眼球快速运动系统中“启动”与“停止”信号之间的动态交互作用:关于潜在神经机制功能独立性的新反证。
Vision Res. 2009 Jun;49(10):1316-28. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2008.07.018. Epub 2008 Sep 19.
8
The reentry hypothesis: the putative interaction of the frontal eye field, ventrolateral prefrontal cortex, and areas V4, IT for attention and eye movement.折返假说:额叶眼区、腹外侧前额叶皮层以及V4区、颞下回在注意力和眼球运动方面的假定相互作用。
Cereb Cortex. 2005 Apr;15(4):431-47. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhh146.
9
Difficulty of visual search modulates neuronal interactions and response variability in the frontal eye field.视觉搜索难度调节额叶眼区的神经元相互作用和反应变异性。
J Neurophysiol. 2007 Nov;98(5):2580-7. doi: 10.1152/jn.00522.2007. Epub 2007 Sep 12.
10
Saccade landing point selection and the competition account of pro- and antisaccade generation: the involvement of visual attention--a review.扫视落点选择与正、反扫视生成的竞争理论:视觉注意的参与——综述
Scand J Psychol. 2007 Apr;48(2):97-113. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2007.00537.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Neural mechanisms for executive control of speed-accuracy trade-off.用于速度-准确性权衡的执行控制的神经机制。
Cell Rep. 2023 Nov 28;42(11):113422. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2023.113422. Epub 2023 Nov 10.
2
The Role of Extra-motor Networks in Upper Limb Motor Performance Post-stroke.脑卒后上肢运动表现中运动外网络的作用。
Neuroscience. 2023 Mar 15;514:1-13. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2023.01.033. Epub 2023 Feb 1.
3
Influence of the Location of a Decision Cue on the Dynamics of Pupillary Light Response.决策线索位置对瞳孔光反应动态的影响。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2022 Jan 26;15:755383. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.755383. eCollection 2021.
4
Motor dexterity and strength depend upon integrity of the attention-control system.手的灵活性和力量取决于注意力控制系统的完整性。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Jan 16;115(3):E536-E545. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1715617115. Epub 2017 Dec 28.