Restrepo Diego, Whitesell Jennifer, Doucette Wilder
Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, Neuroscience Program, and Rocky Mountain Taste and Smell Center, University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado 80045, USA.
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2009 Jul;1170:298-305. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04375.x.
Recent work from our laboratory in awake behaving animals shows that olfactory bulb processing changes depending profoundly on behavioral context. Thus, we find that when recording from the olfactory bulb in a mouse during a go-no go association learning task, it is not unusual to find a mitral cell that initially does not respond to the rewarded or unrewarded odors but develops a differential response to the stimuli during the learning session. This places a challenge on how to approach understanding of olfactory bulb processing, because neural interactions differ depending on the status of the animal. Here we address the question of how the different approaches to study olfactory bulb neuron responses, including studies in anesthetized and unanesthetized animals in vivo and recordings in slices, complement each other. We conclude that more critical understanding of the relationship between the measurements in the different preparations is necessary for future advances in the understanding of olfactory bulb processing of odor information.
我们实验室最近对清醒行为动物所做的研究表明,嗅球的处理过程会因行为背景而发生深刻变化。因此,我们发现在对一只处于“去 - 不去”联想学习任务中的小鼠嗅球进行记录时,经常会发现一个最初对奖励或未奖励气味均无反应的二尖瓣细胞,但在学习过程中会对这些刺激产生差异反应。这给理解嗅球的处理过程带来了挑战,因为神经相互作用会因动物状态的不同而有所差异。在此,我们探讨了研究嗅球神经元反应的不同方法是如何相互补充的,这些方法包括对麻醉和未麻醉动物的体内研究以及脑片记录。我们得出结论,为了在理解嗅球对气味信息的处理方面取得未来进展,更深入地理解不同实验准备中测量结果之间的关系是必要的。