Suppr超能文献

用奥替尼啶二盐酸盐对中央静脉置管部位进行皮肤消毒:一项双盲、随机、对照试验。

Skin disinfection with octenidine dihydrochloride for central venous catheter site care: a double-blind, randomized, controlled trial.

机构信息

Division of Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, Department of Environmental Health Sciences, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.

出版信息

Clin Microbiol Infect. 2010 Jun;16(6):600-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2009.02917.x. Epub 2009 Aug 17.

Abstract

To compare the efficacy of two commercially available, alcohol-based antiseptic solutions for preparation and care of central venous catheter (CVC) insertion sites, with and without octenidine dihydrochloride, a double-blind, randomized, controlled trial was undertaken in the haematology units and in one surgical unit of two university hospitals. Adult patients with a non-tunnelled CVC were randomly assigned to two different skin disinfection regimens at the insertion site: 0.1% octenidine with 30% 1-propanol and 45% 2-propanol, and as control 74% ethanol with 10% 2-propanol. Endpoints were (i) skin colonization at the insertion site; (ii) positive culture from the catheter tip (> or = 15 CFU); and (iii) occurrence of CVC-associated bloodstream infection (defined according to criteria set by the CDC). Four hundred patients with inserted CVC were enrolled from May 2002 through April 2005. Both groups were similar in respect of patient characteristics and co-morbidities. Skin colonization at the CVC insertion site during the first 10 days was significantly reduced by octenidine treatment (relative difference octenidine vs. control: 0.21; 95%CI: 0.11-0.39, p <0.0001). Positive culture of the catheter tip was significantly less frequent in the octenidine group (7.9%) than in the control group (17.8%): OR = 0.39 (95%CI: 0.20-0.80, p 0.009). Patients treated with octenidine had a non-significant reduction in catheter-associated bloodstream infections (4.1% vs. 8.3%; OR = 0.44; 95%CI: 0.18-1.08, p 0.081). Side effects were similar in both groups. This randomized controlled trial supports the results of two observational studies demonstrating octenidine in alcoholic solution to be a better option than alcohol alone for the prevention of CVC-associated infections.

摘要

为了比较两种市售的、含酒精的消毒剂用于准备和护理中心静脉导管(CVC)插入部位的效果,有无奥替尼啶二盐酸盐,在两家大学医院的血液科和一个外科病房进行了一项双盲、随机、对照试验。将非隧道式 CVC 的成年患者随机分配到两种不同的皮肤消毒方案:0.1%奥替尼啶+30%1-丙醇+45%2-丙醇和对照组 74%乙醇+10%2-丙醇。终点是(i)插入部位皮肤定植;(ii)导管尖端阳性培养(≥15 CFU);以及(iii)CVC 相关性血流感染的发生(根据 CDC 设定的标准定义)。2002 年 5 月至 2005 年 4 月期间共纳入 400 例插入 CVC 的患者。两组患者的特征和合并症相似。奥替尼啶治疗显著降低了 CVC 插入部位 10 天内的皮肤定植(奥替尼啶与对照组的相对差异:0.21;95%CI:0.11-0.39,p<0.0001)。奥替尼啶组导管尖端阳性培养的频率明显低于对照组(7.9%比 17.8%):比值比=0.39(95%CI:0.20-0.80,p=0.009)。奥替尼啶组患者的导管相关性血流感染发生率有降低的趋势(4.1%比 8.3%),但无统计学意义(比值比=0.44;95%CI:0.18-1.08,p=0.081)。两组的副作用相似。这项随机对照试验支持了两项观察性研究的结果,表明含酒精的奥替尼啶溶液是预防 CVC 相关性感染的一种比单独使用酒精更好的选择。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验