Langevin Marilyn
Institute for Stuttering Treatment & Research, Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Alberta, 1500, 8215 - 112 Street, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2C8, Canada.
J Fluency Disord. 2009 Jun;34(2):72-86. doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2009.05.001. Epub 2009 May 14.
Psychometric properties of the Peer Attitudes Toward Children who Stutter (PATCS) scale (Langevin, M., & Hagler, P. (2004). Development of a scale to measure peer attitudes toward children who stutter. In A.K. Bothe (Ed.), Evidence-based treatment of stuttering: empirical bases and clinical applications (pp. 139-171). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.) and the extent to which peer attitudes are negative were re-examined. Results show that internal consistency was .97 and test-retest reliability was .85. In a known groups analysis participants who had contact with someone who stutters had statistically significant higher mean scores (more positive attitudes) than those who had not had contact. Nonsignificant findings for gender and grade call into question the usefulness of these variables as discriminators in future tests of known groups validity of peer attitudes toward children who stutter. Approximately one-fifth of participants had PATCS scores that were somewhat to very negative. These findings support calls for school-based education about stuttering.
The reader will be able to: (1) summarize the social impacts of stuttering on school-age children who stutter, (2) describe the known groups method to test construct validity, (3) evaluate the psychometric properties of the Peer Attitudes Toward Children who Stutter scale, and (4) provide information about the proportion of students who appear to hold negative attitudes toward children who stutter.
重新审视了《同龄人对口吃儿童的态度》(PATCS)量表的心理测量特性(兰热万,M.,& 哈格勒,P.(2004年)。开发一种量表以测量同龄人对口吃儿童的态度。载于A.K. 博特(编),《口吃的循证治疗:实证基础与临床应用》(第139 - 171页)。新泽西州马哈瓦:劳伦斯·埃尔拉姆联合公司)以及同龄人态度消极的程度。结果显示,内部一致性为0.97,重测信度为0.85。在已知群体分析中,与口吃者有接触的参与者的平均得分在统计学上显著高于没有接触过的参与者(态度更积极)。性别和年级方面的无显著结果让人质疑这些变量在未来对口吃儿童同龄人态度的已知群体效度测试中作为区分因素的有用性。约五分之一的参与者的PATCS得分有些消极到非常消极。这些发现支持了开展关于口吃的学校教育的呼吁。
读者将能够:(1)总结口吃对学龄口吃儿童的社会影响,(2)描述用于测试结构效度的已知群体方法,(3)评估《同龄人对口吃儿童的态度》量表的心理测量特性,以及(4)提供有关似乎对口吃儿童持消极态度的学生比例的信息。