• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项关于在杜普伊特伦挛缩症筋膜切除术后使用可吸收缝线与不可吸收缝线进行伤口闭合的前瞻性随机试验。

A prospective randomised trial of absorbable versus non-absorbable sutures for wound closure after fasciectomy for Dupuytren's contracture.

作者信息

Howard K, Simison A J M, Morris A, Bhalaik V

机构信息

Orthopaedic Department, Arrowe Park Hospital, Upton, Wirral, Merseyside, UK.

出版信息

J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2009 Oct;34(5):618-20. doi: 10.1177/1753193409105728. Epub 2009 Aug 17.

DOI:10.1177/1753193409105728
PMID:19687084
Abstract

After fasciectomy for Dupuytren's contracture the wound has traditionally been closed with non-absorbable sutures. A prospective randomised study of 59 patients was undertaken to compare wound closure after fasciectomy with irradiated polyglactin 910 absorbable sutures and non-absorbable sutures. The outcomes studied were: time spent attending to the wound at the first postoperative visit; the patient's pain score at that visit; and any complications. Wound care required significantly more time when non-absorbable sutures were used. There was no significant difference in pain scores or in complications between the two groups. We recommend the use of irradiated polyglactin 910 absorbable sutures for wound closure after fasciectomy as it saves time and resources without compromising wound healing.

摘要

在进行Dupuytren挛缩筋膜切除术后,传统上伤口是用不可吸收缝线缝合的。我们进行了一项针对59例患者的前瞻性随机研究,以比较使用辐照聚乙醇酸910可吸收缝线和不可吸收缝线进行筋膜切除术后伤口闭合的情况。所研究的结果包括:术后首次就诊时处理伤口所花费的时间;该次就诊时患者的疼痛评分;以及任何并发症。使用不可吸收缝线时,伤口护理需要显著更多的时间。两组之间在疼痛评分或并发症方面没有显著差异。我们建议在筋膜切除术后使用辐照聚乙醇酸910可吸收缝线进行伤口闭合,因为它节省时间和资源,且不影响伤口愈合。

相似文献

1
A prospective randomised trial of absorbable versus non-absorbable sutures for wound closure after fasciectomy for Dupuytren's contracture.一项关于在杜普伊特伦挛缩症筋膜切除术后使用可吸收缝线与不可吸收缝线进行伤口闭合的前瞻性随机试验。
J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2009 Oct;34(5):618-20. doi: 10.1177/1753193409105728. Epub 2009 Aug 17.
2
Re: Howard et al. A prospective randomised trial of absorbable vs. non-absorbable sutures for wound closure after fasciectomy for Dupuytren's contracture. J Hand Surg Eur. 2009, 34: 618-20.
J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2010 Jul;35(6):519; author reply 519-20. doi: 10.1177/1753193410374681.
3
Hueston revisited: use of acellular dermal matrix following fasciectomy for the treatment of Dupuytren's disease.休斯顿再探讨:筋膜切除术后使用脱细胞真皮基质治疗掌腱膜挛缩症。
Ann Plast Surg. 2014 Dec;73 Suppl 2:S178-80. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000133.
4
A feasibility study investigating the acceptability and design of a multicentre randomised controlled trial of needle fasciotomy versus limited fasciectomy for the treatment of Dupuytren's contractures of the fingers (HAND-1): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.一项关于针状筋膜切开术与有限筋膜切除术治疗手指掌腱膜挛缩症的多中心随机对照试验的可接受性和设计的可行性研究(HAND-1):一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2017 Aug 25;18(1):392. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2127-9.
5
Comparative study of "staples versus sutures" in skin closure following Dupuytren's surgery.Dupuytren手术皮肤缝合中“吻合钉与缝线”的对比研究。
J Hand Surg Br. 2002 Feb;27(1):53-4. doi: 10.1054/jhsb.2001.0723.
6
Limited fasciectomy with versus without autologous adipose tissue grafting for treatment of Dupuytren's contracture (REMEDY): study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial.局限性掌腱膜切除术联合与不联合自体脂肪组织移植治疗掌腱膜挛缩症(REMEDY):一项多中心随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2024 Sep 2;25(1):577. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08410-4.
7
Dupuytren's contracture: an analysis of outcomes of percutaneous needle fasciotomy versus open fasciectomy.杜普伊特伦挛缩症:经皮针状筋膜切开术与开放性筋膜切除术的疗效分析
ANZ J Surg. 2015 Sep;85(9):639-43. doi: 10.1111/ans.12513. Epub 2014 Jan 20.
8
The efficacy and safety of fasciectomy and fasciotomy for Dupuytren's contracture in European patients: a structured review of published studies.欧洲患者中 Dupuytren 挛缩症行筋膜切除术和筋膜切开术的疗效及安全性:已发表研究的结构化综述
J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2011 Jun;36(5):396-407. doi: 10.1177/1753193410397971. Epub 2011 Mar 7.
9
Surgical alternatives in Dupuytren's contracture.
Hand Clin. 1991 Nov;7(4):715-9; discussion 721-2.
10
Layer closure of laparotomy wounds with absorbable and non-absorbable suture materials.使用可吸收和不可吸收缝合材料进行剖腹手术伤口的分层缝合。
Br J Surg. 1976 Oct;63(10):793-6. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800631015.

引用本文的文献

1
A retrospective comparison of absorbable versus non-absorbable sutures for elective hand surgery wound closures.择期手部手术伤口缝合中可吸收缝线与不可吸收缝线的回顾性比较。
J Hand Microsurg. 2024 Nov 19;17(1):100178. doi: 10.1016/j.jham.2024.100178. eCollection 2025 Jan.
2
Trigger Finger Release: Are Sutures Requiring Removal Necessary?扳机指松解术:是否需要拆除缝线?
J Hand Surg Glob Online. 2023 Aug 4;5(6):740-743. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2023.06.010. eCollection 2023 Nov.
3
Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Absorbable and Nonabsorbable Sutures in A1 Pulley Release.
比较可吸收缝线与不可吸收缝线用于A1滑车松解的前瞻性随机对照试验
Hand (N Y). 2025 Mar;20(2):203-207. doi: 10.1177/15589447231210332. Epub 2023 Nov 24.
4
Prospective international multicenter observational study of Novosyn® Quick for skin closures in adults and children (SKINNOQ).关于Novosyn® Quick用于成人及儿童皮肤缝合的前瞻性国际多中心观察性研究(SKINNOQ)。
BMC Surg. 2019 May 2;19(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s12893-019-0506-8.
5
Surgery for Dupuytren's contracture of the fingers.手指掌腱膜挛缩症的手术治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Dec 9;2015(12):CD010143. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010143.pub2.
6
Clinical outcome and wound healing following carpal tunnel decompression: a comparison of two common suture materials.腕管减压术后的临床结果与伤口愈合:两种常用缝合材料的比较
Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:270137. doi: 10.1155/2014/270137. Epub 2014 Aug 7.
7
Continuous versus interrupted skin sutures for non-obstetric surgery.非产科手术中连续缝合与间断缝合皮肤的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Feb 14;2014(2):CD010365. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010365.pub2.