Shaw William S, Pransky Glenn, Winters Thomas, Tveito Torill H, Larson Susan M, Roter Debra L
Center for Disability Research, Liberty Mutual Research Institute for Safety, Hopkinton, Massachusetts 01748, USA.
J Occup Environ Med. 2009 Sep;51(9):1032-40. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0b013e3181b2f539.
To determine whether patterns of patient-provider communication might vary depending on psychosocial risk factors for back disability.
Working adults (N = 97; 64% men; median age = 38 years) with work-related low back pain completed a risk factor questionnaire and then agreed to have provider visits audiotaped. Verbal exchanges were divided into utterances and coded for content, then compared among low-, medium-, and high-risk patients.
Among high-risk patients only, providers asked more biomedical questions, patients provided more biomedical information, and providers used more language to engage patients and facilitate communication. There were no group differences in psychosocial exchanges.
Clinicians may recognize the need for more detailed assessment of patients with multiple psychosocial factors, but increases in communication are focused on medical explanations and therapeutic regimen, not on lifestyle and psychosocial factors.
确定患者与医疗服务提供者之间的沟通模式是否会因背部残疾的心理社会风险因素而有所不同。
患有与工作相关的下背痛的在职成年人(N = 97;64%为男性;中位年龄 = 38岁)完成了一份风险因素问卷,然后同意对与医疗服务提供者的就诊过程进行录音。言语交流被分为话语单元并按内容编码,然后在低风险、中度风险和高风险患者之间进行比较。
仅在高风险患者中,医疗服务提供者询问了更多生物医学问题,患者提供了更多生物医学信息,并且医疗服务提供者使用更多语言来吸引患者并促进沟通。心理社会交流方面没有组间差异。
临床医生可能认识到需要对具有多种心理社会因素的患者进行更详细的评估,但沟通的增加集中在医学解释和治疗方案上,而不是生活方式和心理社会因素上。