Tomljenovic-Hanic Snjezana, Rahmani Adel, Steel M J, de Sterke C Martijn
ARC Center of Excellence for Ultrahigh-bandwidth Devices for Optical Systems (CUDOS), 2School of Physics, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW 2006, Australia.
Opt Express. 2009 Aug 17;17(17):14552-7. doi: 10.1364/oe.17.014552.
Optical cavities provide a route to sensing through the shift of the optical resonant peak. However, effective sensing with optical cavities requires the optimization of the modal quality factor, Q, and the field overlap with the sample, f. For a photonic crystal slab (PCS) this figure of merit, M = fQ, involves two competing effects. The air modes usually have large f but small Q, whereas the dielectric modes have high-Q and small f. We compare the sensitivity of air and dielectric modes for different PCS cavity designs and account for loss associated with absorption by the sensed sample or its host liquid. We find that optimizing Q at the expense of f is the most beneficial strategy, and modes deriving from the dielectric bands are thus preferred.
光学腔提供了一种通过光学共振峰的移动进行传感的途径。然而,利用光学腔进行有效的传感需要优化模式品质因数Q以及与样品的场重叠率f。对于光子晶体平板(PCS)而言,这个品质因数M = fQ涉及两种相互竞争的效应。空气模式通常具有较大的f但较小的Q,而介电模式具有高Q和较小的f。我们比较了不同PCS腔设计中空气模式和介电模式的灵敏度,并考虑了与被感测样品或其主体液体吸收相关的损耗。我们发现,以牺牲f为代价来优化Q是最有益的策略,因此源自介电带的模式更受青睐。