Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University Hospital, RWTH Aachen University, Pauwelsstrasse 30, 52074 Aachen, Germany.
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2010 Apr;33(2):297-306. doi: 10.1007/s00270-009-9681-9. Epub 2009 Aug 18.
The purpose of this study was to investigate differences in change of size and CT value between local recurrences and tumor-free areas after CT-guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of hepatic metastases during follow-up by means of dedicated software for automatic evaluation of hepatic lesions. Thirty-two patients with 54 liver metastases from breast or colorectal cancer underwent triphasic contrast-enhanced multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT) to evaluate hepatic metastatic spread and localization before CT-guided RFA and for follow-up after intervention. Sixteen of these patients (65.1 + or - 10.3 years) with 30 metastases stayed tumor-free (group 1), while the other group (n = 16 with 24 metastases; 62.0 + or - 13.8 years) suffered from local recurrent disease (group 2). Applying an automated software tool (SyngoCT Oncology; Siemens Healthcare, Forchheim, Germany), size parameters (volume, RECIST, WHO) and attenuation were measured within the lesions before, 1 day after, and 28 days after RFA treatment. The natural logarithm (ln) of the quotient of the volume 1 day versus 28 days after RFA treament was computed: lnQ1//28/0(volume). Analogously, ln ratios of RECIST, WHO, and attenuation were computed and statistically evaluated by repeated-measures ANOVA. One lesion in group 2 was excluded from further evaluation due to automated missegmentation. Statistically significant differences between the two groups were observed with respect to initial volume, RECIST, and WHO (p < 0.05). Furthermore, ln ratios corresponding to volume, RECIST, and WHO differed significantly between the two groups. Attenuation evaluations showed no significant differences, but there was a trend toward attenuation assessment for the parameter lnQ28/0(attenuation) (p = 0.0527), showing higher values for group 1 (-0.4 + or - 0.3) compared to group 2 (-0.2 + or - 0.2). In conclusion, hepatic metastases and their zone of coagulation necrosis after RFA differed significantly between tumor-free and local-recurrent ablation zones with respect to the corresponding size parameters. A new parameter (lnQ1//28/0(volume/RECIST/WHO/attenuation)) was introduced, which appears to be of prognostic value at early follow-up CT.
本研究旨在通过专用软件自动评估肝脏病变,研究肝转移瘤 CT 引导下射频消融(RFA)后随访中肿瘤大小和 CT 值变化的差异。32 例乳腺癌或结直肠癌肝转移患者行三期增强多排 CT(MDCT)检查,评估肝转移扩散和定位,指导 CT 引导下 RFA 术前及介入后随访。其中 16 例(65.1±10.3 岁)30 个转移灶无肿瘤(组 1),而另一组(n=16 例,24 个转移灶;62.0±13.8 岁)出现局部复发病灶(组 2)。应用自动软件工具(SyngoCT Oncology;西门子医疗,Forchheim,德国),在 RFA 治疗前、治疗后 1 天和 28 天测量病变内的大小参数(体积、RECIST、WHO)和衰减值。计算 RFA 治疗后 1 天与 28 天体积比值的自然对数(lnQ1//28/0(体积)。类似地,计算 RECIST、WHO 和衰减的比值,并通过重复测量 ANOVA 进行统计学评估。由于自动分割错误,组 2 中有 1 个病灶被排除在进一步评估之外。两组间初始体积、RECIST 和 WHO 差异有统计学意义(p<0.05)。此外,两组间体积、RECIST 和 WHO 的 ln 比值差异有统计学意义。衰减评估无显著差异,但参数 lnQ28/0(衰减)有衰减评估趋势(p=0.0527),组 1(-0.4±0.3)较组 2(-0.2±0.2)高。总之,RFA 后无肿瘤和局部复发病灶的肝转移及其凝固性坏死区在相应的大小参数方面存在显著差异。引入了一个新的参数(lnQ1//28/0(体积/RECIST/WHO/衰减)),在早期随访 CT 中似乎具有预后价值。