• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

三维边缘评估可预测结直肠癌肝转移消融后局部肿瘤进展。

3D margin assessment predicts local tumor progression after ablation of colorectal cancer liver metastases.

机构信息

Department of Interventional Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

Int J Hyperthermia. 2022;39(1):880-887. doi: 10.1080/02656736.2022.2055795.

DOI:10.1080/02656736.2022.2055795
PMID:35848428
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9442248/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the feasibility and prognostic value of 3D measuring of the ablation margins using a dedicated image registration software.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 104 colorectal liver metastases in 68 consecutive patients that underwent microwave ablation between 08/2012 and 08/2019. The minimal ablation margin (MM) was measured in 2D using anatomic landmarks on contrast enhanced CT(CECT) 4-8 weeks post-ablation, and in 3D using an image registration software and immediate post-ablation CECT. Local tumor progression (LTP) was assessed by imaging up to 24 months after ablation. A blinded interventional radiologist provided feedback on the possibility of additional ablation after examining the 3D-margin measurements.

RESULTS

The 3D-margin assessment was completed in 79/104 (76%) tumors without the need for target manipulation. In 25/104 (24%) tumors, manipulation was required due to image misregistration. LTP was observed in 40/104 (38.5%) tumors: 92.5% vs 7.5% for those with margin <5mm vs ≥5mm, respectively ( = 0.0001). The 2D and 3D-assessments identified margin <5mm in 17/104 (16%), and in 74/104 (71%) ablated tumors, respectively ( < 0.01). The sensitivity and specificity of the 3D software for predicting LTP was 93% (37/40) and 42% (27/64), respectively. Additional ablation to achieve a MM of 5 mm would have been offered in 26/37 cases if the 3D-margin assessment was available intraoperatively.

CONCLUSION

Image registration software can measure ablation margins and detect MM under 5 mm intraoperatively, with significantly higher sensitivity than the 2D technique using landmarks on the post-ablation CECT. The identification of a margin under 5 mm is strongly associated with LTP.

摘要

目的

利用专用图像配准软件确定 3D 测量消融边界的可行性和预后价值。

方法

本回顾性研究纳入了 2012 年 8 月至 2019 年 8 月期间接受微波消融治疗的 68 例连续患者的 104 例结直肠肝转移瘤。在消融后 4-8 周,使用对比增强 CT(CECT)上的解剖学标志在 2D 中测量最小消融边界(MM),并使用图像配准软件和即时消融后 CECT 在 3D 中测量。通过消融后 24 个月的影像学评估局部肿瘤进展(LTP)。一位盲法介入放射科医生在检查了 3D 边界测量值后,就进一步消融的可能性提供了反馈。

结果

在 79/104(76%)个肿瘤中,无需进行目标操作即可完成 3D 边界评估。在 25/104(24%)个肿瘤中,由于图像配准错误,需要进行操作。在 40/104(38.5%)个肿瘤中观察到 LTP:边界 <5mm 的肿瘤分别为 92.5%和 7.5%,边界≥5mm( = 0.0001)。2D 和 3D 评估分别在 17/104(16%)和 74/104(71%)个消融肿瘤中识别出边界 <5mm( < 0.01)。3D 软件预测 LTP 的敏感性和特异性分别为 93%(37/40)和 42%(27/64)。如果术中可获得 3D 边界评估,将在 26/37 例中提供额外消融以达到 5mm 的 MM。

结论

图像配准软件可以在术中测量消融边界并检测 MM 低于 5mm,其敏感性明显高于使用消融后 CECT 上的解剖学标志的 2D 技术。边界低于 5mm 的识别与 LTP 密切相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1eea/9442248/bfcf72d919e7/nihms-1832360-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1eea/9442248/5d125ccbd8bb/nihms-1832360-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1eea/9442248/d3413d9e6d07/nihms-1832360-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1eea/9442248/bfcf72d919e7/nihms-1832360-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1eea/9442248/5d125ccbd8bb/nihms-1832360-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1eea/9442248/d3413d9e6d07/nihms-1832360-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1eea/9442248/bfcf72d919e7/nihms-1832360-f0003.jpg

相似文献

1
3D margin assessment predicts local tumor progression after ablation of colorectal cancer liver metastases.三维边缘评估可预测结直肠癌肝转移消融后局部肿瘤进展。
Int J Hyperthermia. 2022;39(1):880-887. doi: 10.1080/02656736.2022.2055795.
2
Volumetric 3D assessment of ablation zones after thermal ablation of colorectal liver metastases to improve prediction of local tumor progression.热消融治疗结直肠肝转移瘤后消融区域的容积 3D 评估,以提高局部肿瘤进展预测的准确性。
Eur Radiol. 2019 May;29(5):2698-2705. doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5809-0. Epub 2018 Nov 6.
3
Volumetric assessment of the periablational safety margin after thermal ablation of colorectal liver metastases.热消融治疗结直肠癌肝转移后瘤周安全边界的容积评估。
Eur Radiol. 2021 Sep;31(9):6489-6499. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-07579-x. Epub 2021 Jan 14.
4
CT-monitored minimal ablative margin control in single-session microwave ablation of liver tumors: an effective strategy for local tumor control.CT 监测下单次微波消融肝脏肿瘤的最小消融边界控制:局部肿瘤控制的有效策略。
Eur Radiol. 2022 Sep;32(9):6327-6335. doi: 10.1007/s00330-022-08723-5. Epub 2022 Apr 7.
5
Use of Contrast Media During CT-guided Thermal Ablation of Colorectal Liver Metastasis for Procedure Planning is Associated with Improved Immediate Outcomes.在 CT 引导下对结直肠癌肝转移行热消融治疗时使用对比剂进行术前规划与即刻疗效改善相关。
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2023 Mar;46(3):327-336. doi: 10.1007/s00270-022-03333-6. Epub 2023 Jan 6.
6
Ablative margin quantification using deformable versus rigid image registration in colorectal liver metastasis thermal ablation: a retrospective single-center study.使用可变形与刚性图像配准技术评估结直肠肝转移热消融术的消融边界:一项回顾性单中心研究。
Eur Radiol. 2024 Sep;34(9):5541-5550. doi: 10.1007/s00330-024-10632-8. Epub 2024 Feb 9.
7
Ablative Margins of Colorectal Liver Metastases Using Deformable CT Image Registration and Autosegmentation.使用可变形 CT 图像配准和自动分割技术对结直肠肝转移灶进行消融边界评估。
Radiology. 2023 Apr;307(2):e221373. doi: 10.1148/radiol.221373. Epub 2023 Jan 31.
8
Identification of A0 minimum ablative margins for colorectal liver metastases: multicentre, retrospective study using deformable CT registration and artificial intelligence-based autosegmentation.结直肠肝转移瘤最小消融边界的识别:使用形变 CT 配准和基于人工智能的自动分割的多中心回顾性研究。
Br J Surg. 2024 Aug 30;111(9). doi: 10.1093/bjs/znae165.
9
Minimal ablative margin (MAM) assessment with image fusion: an independent predictor for local tumor progression in hepatocellular carcinoma after stereotactic radiofrequency ablation.采用图像融合技术评估最小消融边界(MAM):对立体定向射频消融后肝细胞癌局部肿瘤进展的独立预测因子。
Eur Radiol. 2020 May;30(5):2463-2472. doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06609-7. Epub 2020 Jan 30.
10
Intraprocedural Versus Initial Follow-up Minimal Ablative Margin Assessment After Colorectal Liver Metastasis Thermal Ablation: Which One Better Predicts Local Outcomes?结直肠癌肝转移热消融术后术中与初始随访时最小消融边缘评估的比较:哪一种能更好地预测局部疗效?
Invest Radiol. 2024 Apr 1;59(4):314-319. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000001023. Epub 2023 Oct 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Minimal Ablative Margin Quantification Using Hepatic Arterial Versus Portal Venous Phase CT for Colorectal Metastases Segmentation: A Dual-center, Retrospective Analysis.使用肝动脉期与门静脉期CT进行结直肠癌转移灶分割的最小消融切缘定量:一项双中心回顾性分析
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2025 Jul 24. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0000000000001782.
2
CT-guided Thermal Ablation of Liver Tumors Using Intraprocedural CT-CT Fusion for Applicator Position and Ablation Completeness Assessment: a Single-Center Comparative Analysis.使用术中CT-CT融合技术进行肝脏肿瘤CT引导热消融的敷贴器位置及消融完整性评估:单中心对比分析
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2025 Jul 10. doi: 10.1007/s00270-025-04111-w.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Biopsy and Margins Optimize Outcomes after Thermal Ablation of Colorectal Liver Metastases.活检与切缘优化结直肠癌肝转移热消融术后的疗效
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Jan 29;14(3):693. doi: 10.3390/cancers14030693.
2
Immunofluorescence Assay of Ablated Colorectal Liver Metastases: The Frozen Section of Image-Guided Tumor Ablation?消融后结直肠癌肝转移的免疫荧光检测:影像引导肿瘤消融的冰冻切片?
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2022 Mar;33(3):308-315.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2021.11.008. Epub 2021 Nov 17.
3
A novel use of biomechanical model-based deformable image registration (DIR) for assessing colorectal liver metastases ablation outcomes.
Technical aspects, methodological challenges, and factors predicting outcomes of percutaneous ablation for colorectal liver metastases.
结直肠癌肝转移经皮消融的技术层面、方法学挑战及预测预后的因素
Pol J Radiol. 2025 May 30;90:e279-e285. doi: 10.5114/pjr/204158. eCollection 2025.
4
Estimation of tumor coverage after RF ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma using single 2D image slices.使用单个二维图像切片估计肝细胞癌射频消融后的肿瘤覆盖范围。
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2025 Jun 7. doi: 10.1007/s11548-025-03423-z.
5
Quantitative Ablation Confirmation Methods in Percutaneous Thermal Ablation of Malignant Liver Tumors: Technical Insights, Clinical Evidence, and Future Outlook.恶性肝肿瘤经皮热消融术中的定量消融确认方法:技术见解、临床证据及未来展望
Radiol Imaging Cancer. 2025 May;7(3):e240293. doi: 10.1148/rycan.240293.
6
Prognostic Comparison of Complete vs. Incomplete Radiofrequency Ablation for Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Multicenter Prospective Study.结直肠癌肝转移完全与不完全射频消融的预后比较:一项多中心前瞻性研究
Cancer Med. 2025 Apr;14(8):e70735. doi: 10.1002/cam4.70735.
7
Software-based versus visual assessment of the minimal ablative margin in patients with liver tumours undergoing percutaneous thermal ablation (COVER-ALL): a randomised phase 2 trial.基于软件与视觉评估经皮热消融治疗肝肿瘤患者的最小消融边缘(COVER-ALL):一项随机2期试验
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2025 May;10(5):442-451. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(25)00024-X. Epub 2025 Mar 13.
8
Evaluation of Local Tumor Outcomes Following Microwave Ablation of Colorectal Liver Metastases Using CT Imaging: A Comparison of Visual versus Quantitative Methods.使用CT成像评估微波消融治疗结直肠癌肝转移后的局部肿瘤疗效:视觉评估与定量评估方法的比较
Radiol Imaging Cancer. 2025 Jan;7(1):e230147. doi: 10.1148/rycan.230147.
9
Evaluation of the Ki-67 labeling index on immediate pre-ablation biopsies as a predictive biomarker of local recurrence of colorectal cancer liver metastases.评估即刻消融前活检的Ki-67标记指数作为结直肠癌肝转移局部复发的预测生物标志物。
Cytotechnology. 2025 Feb;77(1):31. doi: 10.1007/s10616-024-00700-8. Epub 2024 Dec 30.
10
Radiofrequency ablation versus microwave ablation for colorectal liver metastases: long-term results of a retrospective cohort surgical experience.射频消融与微波消融治疗结直肠癌肝转移:一项回顾性队列手术经验的长期结果
Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2024 Oct 1;13(5):759-770. doi: 10.21037/hbsn-23-677. Epub 2024 Jul 11.
一种基于生物力学模型的可变形图像配准(DIR)在评估结直肠肝转移瘤消融效果中的新应用。
Med Phys. 2021 Oct;48(10):6226-6236. doi: 10.1002/mp.15147. Epub 2021 Aug 18.
4
Volumetric Quantitative Ablation Margins for Assessment of Ablation Completeness in Thermal Ablation of Liver Tumors.用于评估肝脏肿瘤热消融治疗中消融完整性的容积定量消融边缘
Front Oncol. 2021 Mar 10;11:623098. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.623098. eCollection 2021.
5
Volumetric assessment of the periablational safety margin after thermal ablation of colorectal liver metastases.热消融治疗结直肠癌肝转移后瘤周安全边界的容积评估。
Eur Radiol. 2021 Sep;31(9):6489-6499. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-07579-x. Epub 2021 Jan 14.
6
Factors Associated With Local Tumor Control and Complications After Thermal Ablation of Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases: A 15-year Retrospective Cohort Study.结直肠癌肝转移热消融术后局部肿瘤控制及并发症的相关因素:一项15年回顾性队列研究
Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2021 Jun;20(2):e82-e95. doi: 10.1016/j.clcc.2020.09.005. Epub 2020 Oct 24.
7
A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis of Periprocedural Variables Affecting Local Tumor Progression after Radiofrequency Ablation of Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases.单中心回顾性分析影响结直肠癌肝转移瘤射频消融后局部肿瘤进展的围手术期变量。
Radiology. 2021 Jan;298(1):212-218. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020200109. Epub 2020 Nov 10.
8
Imaging and Image-Guided Thermal Ablation for Oligometastatic Colorectal Cancer Liver Disease.寡转移结直肠癌肝转移的影像学检查与影像引导下的热消融治疗
Cancer J. 2020 Mar/Apr;26(2):124-128. doi: 10.1097/PPO.0000000000000440.
9
Microwave ablation versus resection for colorectal cancer liver metastases - A propensity score analysis from a population-based nationwide registry.微波消融与切除术治疗结直肠癌肝转移的比较——基于全国人群登记数据库的倾向评分分析。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2020 Mar;46(3):476-485. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2019.12.002. Epub 2019 Dec 2.
10
Fluorescent Tissue Assessment of Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases Ablation Zone: A Potential Real-Time Biomarker of Complete Tumor Ablation.结直肠癌肝转移消融灶荧光组织评估:完全肿瘤消融的潜在实时生物标志物
Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 Jun;26(6):1833-1840. doi: 10.1245/s10434-018-07133-6. Epub 2019 Mar 4.