Suppr超能文献

磺脲类药物对转换为胰岛素治疗(每日两次双时相门冬胰岛素30)的影响:在使用次最大剂量格列美脲血糖控制不佳的2型糖尿病患者中,比较加用或不加用格列美脲的每日两次双时相门冬胰岛素30治疗。

Effect of sulfonylureas on switching to insulin therapy (twice-daily biphasic insulin aspart 30): comparison of twice-daily biphasic insulin aspart 30 with or without glimepiride in type 2 diabetic patients poorly controlled with sub-maximal glimepiride.

作者信息

Ebato C, Shimizu T, Arakawa M, Mita T, Fujitani Y, Watada H, Kawamori R, Hirose T

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Metabolism and Endocrinology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2009 Oct;86(1):31-6. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2009.07.008. Epub 2009 Aug 18.

Abstract

AIM

The aim of this study was to compare the effect of continuation or discontinuation of glimepiride upon starting insulin therapy in type 2 diabetic patients poorly controlled with sub-maximal glimepiride.

METHODS

This 48-week, randomized, observational, parallel-group study consisted of a 24-week screening period and a 24-week intervention period. During the screening period, we unified the sulfonylureas to glimepiride at 3mg/day for 8 weeks, and started biphasic insulin aspart 30 (Asp30Mix) once-daily injections for 16 weeks. At the start of the intervention period, we stepped up once- to twice-daily insulin injection and randomized the 26 patients into either continuation of glimepiride group (CONT, n=14) or discontinuation of glimepiride group (DISCON, n=12). The Asp30Mix dose-adjustment algorithm was used in both groups. HbA1C, plasma glucose, insulin daily dose, body weight, and number of hypoglycaemic episodes were evaluated.

RESULTS

At the end of the study, HbA1C improved in CONT more than in DISCON (P<0.01), and daily dose of Asp30Mix was less in CONT than DISCON (P<0.05). Body weight and the numbers of hypoglycaemic episodes were similar between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Continuing glimepiride (sulfonylureas) allows a better glycaemic control with less insulin daily dose compared with discontinuing glimepride.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较在使用次最大剂量格列美脲治疗效果不佳的2型糖尿病患者开始胰岛素治疗时,继续或停用格列美脲的效果。

方法

这项为期48周的随机、观察性、平行组研究包括一个24周的筛查期和一个24周的干预期。在筛查期,我们将磺脲类药物统一为格列美脲,每天3mg,持续8周,并开始每日一次注射双相门冬胰岛素30(Asp30Mix),持续16周。在干预期开始时,我们将胰岛素注射从每日一次增加到每日两次,并将26例患者随机分为继续使用格列美脲组(CONT,n = 14)或停用格列美脲组(DISCON,n = 12)。两组均采用Asp30Mix剂量调整算法。评估糖化血红蛋白(HbA1C)、血糖、每日胰岛素剂量、体重和低血糖发作次数。

结果

在研究结束时,CONT组的HbA1C改善程度大于DISCON组(P < 0.01),CONT组的Asp30Mix每日剂量低于DISCON组(P < 0.05)。两组之间的体重和低血糖发作次数相似。

结论

与停用格列美脲相比,继续使用格列美脲(磺脲类药物)能以较少的每日胰岛素剂量实现更好的血糖控制。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验