Dedhia Param, Kravet Steve, Bulger John, Hinson Tony, Sridharan Anirudh, Kolodner Ken, Wright Scott, Howell Eric
Department of Medicine, Bayview Medical Center, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21224, USA.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2009 Sep;57(9):1540-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2009.02430.x. Epub 2009 Aug 18.
To study the feasibility and effectiveness of a discharge planning intervention.
Quasi-experimental pre-post study design.
General medicine wards at three hospitals: an academic medical center, a community teaching hospital, and a community-based nonteaching hospital.
All patients aged 65 and older admitted to the hospitalist services.
The intervention toolkit had five core elements: admission form with geriatric cues, facsimile to the primary care provider, interdisciplinary worksheet to identify barriers to discharge, pharmacist-physician collaborative medication reconciliation, and predischarge planning appointments.
Thirty-day readmission and return to emergency department rates and patient satisfaction with discharge. Odds ratios were determined, and site effects were examined accordig to interaction terms and Breslow Day statistics.
Two hundred thirty-seven patients were followed during the preintervention period, and 185 were exposed to the intervention. Patients characteristics were similar across the two time periods. The proportion of patients with high-quality transitions home, measured according to Coleman's Care Transition Measures, increased from 68% to 89% (odds ratio (OR)=3.49, 95% confidence interval (CI)=2.06-5.92). Return to the emergency department within 3 days of discharge was lower in the intervention period (10% vs 3%, OR=0.25, 95% CI=0.10-0.62). At 30 days, there was a lower rate of readmission (22% vs 14%, OR=0.59, 95% CI=0.34-0.97) and fewer visits to the emergency department (21% vs 14%, OR=0.61, 95% CI=0.36-1.03) (P=.06).
When hospitalized elderly patients are treated with consideration of their specific needs, healthcare outcomes can be improved.
研究出院计划干预措施的可行性和有效性。
准实验前后对照研究设计。
三家医院的普通内科病房:一家学术医疗中心、一家社区教学医院和一家社区非教学医院。
所有65岁及以上入住医院医师服务病房的患者。
干预工具包有五个核心要素:带有老年提示的入院表格、传真给初级保健提供者、用于识别出院障碍的跨学科工作表、药剂师与医生协作的药物重整以及出院前计划预约。
30天再入院率、返回急诊科率以及患者对出院的满意度。确定比值比,并根据交互项和布雷斯洛 - 戴统计量检查地点效应。
干预前期随访了237名患者,185名患者接受了干预。两个时间段的患者特征相似。根据科尔曼护理过渡指标衡量,高质量回家过渡的患者比例从68%增至89%(比值比(OR)=3.49,95%置信区间(CI)=2.06 - 5.92)。干预期间出院后3天内返回急诊科的比例较低(10%对3%,OR = 0.25,95% CI = 0.10 - 0.62)。30天时,再入院率较低(22%对14%,OR = 0.59,95% CI = 0.34 - 0.97),到急诊科就诊的次数也较少(21%对14%,OR = 0.61,95% CI = 0.36 - 1.03)(P = 0.06)。
当住院老年患者的治疗考虑到其特殊需求时,医疗保健结果可以得到改善。