Li Jin, Li Qi-Xiong, Xie Xian-Fei, Ao Ying, Tie Chao-Rong, Song Ren-Jie
Department of Laboratory, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Eur J Pharmacol. 2009 Oct 12;620(1-3):97-104. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2009.08.021. Epub 2009 Aug 19.
In the present study, we investigated the antioxidative potencies of dihydropyridine calcium antagonists prototype nifedipine, the second generation drug nitrendipine, and the long acting, third generation drug amlodipine on gentamicin-induced renal tubular toxicity in Sprague-Dawley rats. In addition, we analyzed the relationship between renal tubular cell apoptosis and the antioxidative properties of these dihydropyridine calcium antagonists. Results showed that treatment with gentamicin alone caused significant changes in the levels of urinary protein, urinary N-acetyl-beta-d-glucosaminidase, serum creatinine, and blood urea nitrogen. Nifedipine and amlodipine effectively reversed the effect of gentamicin on these parameters. In contrast, nitrendipine either had no effect or worsened gentamicin-induced changes in the levels of urinary protein, urinary N-acetyl-beta-d-glucosaminidase, serum creatinine, and blood urea nitrogen. Furthermore, gentamicin treatment caused significant increases in the levels of malondialdehyde, nitric oxide, nitric oxide synthase and significant decreases in the levels of reduced glutathione, glutathione-S-transferase, and superoxide dismutase in kidney tissues. These effects were dramatically reduced by nifedipine and amlodipine but not affected by nitrendipine. In addition to the biochemical changes, histopathological studies showed that gentamicin caused structural damages in the kidneys; renal tubular cell apoptosis, a decrease in Bcl-2 expression and an increase in Bax expression were observed in all rats treated with gentamicin, nifedipine and amlodipine effectively reversed the effect of gentamicin while nitrendipine worsened them. In conclusion, this study clearly indicated that nifedipine and amlodipine protected against gentamicin-induced nephrotoxicity while nitrendipine had little effect, or even worsened.
在本研究中,我们调查了二氢吡啶类钙拮抗剂原型硝苯地平、第二代药物尼群地平以及长效第三代药物氨氯地平对庆大霉素诱导的Sprague-Dawley大鼠肾小管毒性的抗氧化能力。此外,我们分析了肾小管细胞凋亡与这些二氢吡啶类钙拮抗剂抗氧化特性之间的关系。结果显示,单独使用庆大霉素治疗会导致尿蛋白、尿N-乙酰-β-D-氨基葡萄糖苷酶、血清肌酐和血尿素氮水平发生显著变化。硝苯地平和氨氯地平有效逆转了庆大霉素对这些参数的影响。相比之下,尼群地平要么没有效果,要么使庆大霉素诱导的尿蛋白、尿N-乙酰-β-D-氨基葡萄糖苷酶、血清肌酐和血尿素氮水平变化恶化。此外,庆大霉素治疗导致肾组织中丙二醛、一氧化氮、一氧化氮合酶水平显著升高,还原型谷胱甘肽、谷胱甘肽-S-转移酶和超氧化物歧化酶水平显著降低。这些影响被硝苯地平和氨氯地平显著降低,但不受尼群地平影响。除了生化变化外,组织病理学研究表明,庆大霉素对肾脏造成了结构损伤;在所有接受庆大霉素治疗的大鼠中均观察到肾小管细胞凋亡、Bcl-2表达降低和Bax表达增加,硝苯地平和氨氯地平有效逆转了庆大霉素的作用,而尼群地平则使其恶化。总之,本研究清楚地表明,硝苯地平和氨氯地平可预防庆大霉素诱导的肾毒性,而尼群地平几乎没有效果,甚至会使其恶化。