• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在国王生日输精管结扎节进行的无刀输精管结扎术。

No-scalpel vasectomy at the King's birthday vasectomy festival.

作者信息

Nirapathpongporn A, Huber D H, Krieger J N

机构信息

Population and Community Development Association, Bangkok, Thailand.

出版信息

Lancet. 1990 Apr 14;335(8694):894-5. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(90)90487-p.

DOI:10.1016/0140-6736(90)90487-p
PMID:1969992
Abstract

No-scalpel vasectomy was developed to increase acceptability of vasectomy by elimination of the fear of the incision. Although this method has been used for over 8,000,000 men, the technique is largely unknown in developed countries. During the King's birthday vasectomy festival no-scalpel vasectomy was compared with standard incisional vasectomy in 1203 patients. An average of 57 procedures per day could be done by each physician with the no-scalpel method, compared to 33 procedures with the standard method (p less than 0.001). The complication rate was 0.4/100 procedures for no-scalpel vasectomy compared with 3.1/100 for standard vasectomy (p less than 0.001). No-scalpel vasectomy is a rapid and economic alternative to standard vasectomy, with fewer complications and increased patient acceptability.

摘要

无刀输精管切除术的开发是为了通过消除对切口的恐惧来提高输精管切除术的可接受性。尽管这种方法已被超过800万名男性使用,但在发达国家,该技术很大程度上并不为人所知。在国王生日输精管切除节期间,对1203例患者的无刀输精管切除术与标准切口输精管切除术进行了比较。使用无刀方法,每位医生平均每天可进行57例手术,而标准方法为33例(p<0.001)。无刀输精管切除术的并发症发生率为0.4/100例手术,而标准输精管切除术为3.1/100例(p<0.001)。无刀输精管切除术是标准输精管切除术的一种快速且经济的替代方法,并发症更少,患者接受度更高。

相似文献

1
No-scalpel vasectomy at the King's birthday vasectomy festival.在国王生日输精管结扎节进行的无刀输精管结扎术。
Lancet. 1990 Apr 14;335(8694):894-5. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(90)90487-p.
2
Thailand encourages no-scalpel vasectomies.泰国鼓励采用无刀输精管切除术。
Netw Res Triangle Park N C. 1990 Apr;11(2):15.
3
No-scalpel vasectomy: a unique approach to the vas.无刀输精管切除术:一种独特的输精管处理方法。
IPPF Med Bull. 1993 Dec;27(6):1-2.
4
Vasal sterilization in China.中国的输精管绝育术。
Contraception. 1993 Sep;48(3):255-65. doi: 10.1016/0010-7824(93)90144-v.
5
Scalpel versus no-scalpel incision for vasectomy.输精管切除术的手术刀切口与无手术刀切口对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Apr 18(2):CD004112. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004112.pub3.
6
Scalpel versus no-scalpel incision for vasectomy.输精管结扎术的手术刀切口与无手术刀切口对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Oct 18(4):CD004112. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004112.pub2.
7
Scalpel versus no-scalpel incision for vasectomy.输精管结扎术的手术刀切口与无手术刀切口对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Mar 30;2014(3):CD004112. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004112.pub4.
8
Making vasectomy attractive.让输精管切除术更具吸引力。
Netw Res Triangle Park N C. 1992 Aug;13(1):28-30.
9
Office procedures. No-scalpel vasectomy.门诊手术。无刀输精管结扎术。
Prim Care. 1997 Jun;24(2):433-61. doi: 10.1016/s0095-4543(05)70401-2.
10
No-scalpel vasectomy outside China.中国境外的非手术刀输精管切除术。
Asian J Androl. 2000 Mar;2(1):21-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Review of Vasectomy Complications and Safety Concerns.输精管切除术并发症及安全问题综述
World J Mens Health. 2021 Jul;39(3):406-418. doi: 10.5534/wjmh.200073. Epub 2020 Jul 30.
2
COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF NO-SCALPEL VASECTOMY AND STANDARD INCISIONAL VASECTOMY.非手术刀输精管切除术与标准切口输精管切除术的比较评估
Med J Armed Forces India. 1998 Jan;54(1):32-34. doi: 10.1016/S0377-1237(17)30403-3. Epub 2017 Jun 26.
3
Male contraception.男性避孕
Fertil Steril. 2016 Nov;106(6):1303-1309. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.08.036. Epub 2016 Sep 24.
4
Scalpel versus no-scalpel incision for vasectomy.输精管结扎术的手术刀切口与无手术刀切口对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Mar 30;2014(3):CD004112. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004112.pub4.
5
Vasectomy occlusion techniques for male sterilization.用于男性绝育的输精管结扎闭塞技术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Mar 30;2014(3):CD003991. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003991.pub4.
6
Advances in male contraception.男性避孕方法的进展。
Endocr Rev. 2008 Jun;29(4):465-93. doi: 10.1210/er.2007-0041. Epub 2008 Apr 24.
7
Routine antibiotic prophylaxis is not necessary for no scalpel vasectomy.
Int Urol Nephrol. 2005;37(4):763-5. doi: 10.1007/s11255-005-2089-9.
8
Vasectomy surgical techniques: a systematic review.输精管切除术手术技术:一项系统评价。
BMC Med. 2004 May 24;2:21. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-2-21.
9
[Ambulatory vasectomy. Risks and complications].[门诊输精管切除术。风险与并发症]
Urologe A. 2003 Aug;42(8):1029-34. doi: 10.1007/s00120-003-0402-8.
10
Trends in vasectomy. Analysis of one teaching practice.输精管切除术的趋势。一项教学实践分析。
Can Fam Physician. 1998 Mar;44:552-7.