Duarte Hem, Vieck R, Siqueira D F, Angelieri F, Bommarito S, Dalben G, Sannomiya E K
Faculdade de Odontologia, Universidade Metodista de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2009 Sep;38(6):393-400. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/40996636.
To evaluate the influence of JPEG quality factors 100, 80 and 60 on the reproducibility of identification of cephalometric points on images of lateral cephalograms, compared with the Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) format.
The sample was composed of 30 images of digital lateral cephalograms obtained from 30 individuals (15 males and 15 females) on a phosphor plate system in DICOM format. The images were converted to JPEG with quality factors 100, 80 and 60 with the aid of software, adding up to 90 images. The 120 images (DICOM, JPEG 100, 80 and 60) were blinded and 12 cephalometric points were identified on each image by three calibrated orthodontists, using the x-y coordinate system, on a cephalometric software.
The results revealed that identification of cephalometric points was highly reproducible, except for the point Orbitale (Or) on the x-axis. The different file formats did not present a statistically significant difference.
JPEG images of lateral cephalograms with quality factors 100, 80 and 60 did not present alterations in the reproducibility of identification of cephalometric points compared with the DICOM format. Good reproducibility was achieved for the 12 points, except for point Or on the x-axis.
与医学数字成像和通信(DICOM)格式相比,评估JPEG质量因子100、80和60对头颅侧位片图像上头影测量点识别重复性的影响。
样本由30张数字头颅侧位片图像组成,这些图像来自30名个体(15名男性和15名女性),采用磷光板系统以DICOM格式获取。借助软件将图像转换为质量因子为100、80和60的JPEG格式,共计90张图像。这120张图像(DICOM、JPEG 100、80和60)进行了盲法处理,三名经过校准的正畸医生在头颅测量软件上使用x-y坐标系,在每张图像上识别12个头影测量点。
结果显示,除了x轴上的眶点(Or)外,头影测量点的识别具有高度重复性。不同的文件格式没有呈现出统计学上的显著差异。
与DICOM格式相比,质量因子为100、80和60的头颅侧位片JPEG图像在头影测量点识别的重复性方面没有出现改变。除x轴上的Or点外,12个点均实现了良好的重复性。