Suppr超能文献

躺卧行为:评估散栏饲养奶牛群体内和群体间的差异

Lying behavior: assessing within- and between-herd variation in free-stall-housed dairy cows.

作者信息

Ito K, Weary D M, von Keyserlingk M A G

机构信息

Faculty of Land and Food Systems, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

出版信息

J Dairy Sci. 2009 Sep;92(9):4412-20. doi: 10.3168/jds.2009-2235.

Abstract

One of the most important design criteria for dairy cow housing is access to a comfortable lying area. Behaviors such as the time cows spend lying down and how often they lie down can be used to evaluate the quality of stalls; however, assessing lying behavior on farms can be challenging. Indices such as the cow comfort index (CCI) and stall use index (SUI) have been widely used in on-farm assessments. The aims were to establish reliable sampling and recording methods for measuring lying behavior, to evaluate the adequacy of the CCI and SUI as estimates of lying behavior, and to describe variation in the lying behaviors of free-stall-housed dairy cows. The time spent lying down and the number of lying bouts for 2,033 cows on 43 farms were recorded for 5 d using electronic data loggers sampling at 1-min intervals. The CCI and SUI were calculated based on a single observation taken 2 h before the afternoon milking on each farm. Subsets of data were created, including 4, 3, 2, or 1 d per cow and 40, 30, 20, 10, 5, or 1 cow(s) per farm. The estimates derived from each sample size were compared with the overall means (based on 5 d and 44 cows per farm) for lying time and number of lying bouts, and the CCI and SUI were compared with the farm means of lying time, number of lying bouts, and bout duration using linear regression. Recording 30 or more cows for 3 d or more represented the overall means with high accuracy (R(2) > 0.9), but using fewer cows or fewer days per cow resulted in poorer estimates of the farm mean. The CCI and SUI showed no association with the daily lying time (h/d; R(2) < 0.01), and CCI was only weakly associated with the number of lying bouts per day (R(2) = 0.16) and bout duration (min/bout; R(2) = 0.09). Cows lay down 11.0 +/- 2.1 h/d in 9 +/- 3 bouts/d, with a bout duration of 88 +/- 30 min/bout. These values ranged from 9.5 to 12.9 h/d, 7 to 10 bouts/d, and 65 to 112 min/bout across farm means, and 4.2 to 19.5 h/d, 1 to 28 bouts/d, and 22 to 342 min/bout across individuals, showing that variation in lying behavior among individual cows within farm was greater than differences among farms.

摘要

奶牛舍最重要的设计标准之一是要有一个舒适的躺卧区域。奶牛躺卧的时间以及躺卧的频率等行为可用于评估牛栏的质量;然而,在农场中评估躺卧行为可能具有挑战性。牛舒适度指数(CCI)和牛栏使用指数(SUI)等指标已在农场评估中广泛使用。目的是建立可靠的采样和记录方法来测量躺卧行为,评估CCI和SUI作为躺卧行为估计指标的充分性,并描述散栏饲养奶牛躺卧行为的变化。使用电子数据记录器以1分钟的间隔对43个农场的2033头奶牛的躺卧时间和躺卧次数进行了5天的记录。CCI和SUI是根据每个农场下午挤奶前2小时的单次观察计算得出的。创建了数据子集,包括每头奶牛4天、3天、2天或1天的数据,以及每个农场40头、30头、20头、10头、5头或1头奶牛的数据。将每个样本量得出的估计值与躺卧时间和躺卧次数的总体均值(基于每个农场5天和44头奶牛)进行比较,并使用线性回归将CCI和SUI与农场躺卧时间、躺卧次数和每次躺卧持续时间的均值进行比较。记录30头或更多奶牛3天或更长时间能以较高的准确性代表总体均值(R²>0.9),但使用较少的奶牛或每头奶牛记录较少的天数会导致对农场均值的估计较差。CCI和SUI与每日躺卧时间(小时/天;R²<0.01)无关联,CCI仅与每天的躺卧次数(R² = 0.16)和每次躺卧持续时间(分钟/次;R² = 0.09)有较弱的关联。奶牛每天躺卧11.0±2.1小时,分9±3次躺卧,每次躺卧持续时间为88±30分钟。这些值在农场均值中范围为9.5至12.9小时/天、7至10次/天、65至112分钟/次,在个体中范围为4.2至19.5小时/天、1至28次/天、22至342分钟/次,这表明农场内个体奶牛躺卧行为的差异大于农场之间的差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验