• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Schwartz 结果量表-10 的结构效度:与人际困扰、成人依恋、述情障碍、五因素模型、浪漫关系长度和儿童期记忆评定的比较。

Construct validity of the Schwartz outcome scale-10: comparisons to interpersonal distress, adult attachment, alexithymia, the five-factor model, romantic relationship length and ratings of childhood memories.

机构信息

Nassau University Medical Center, USA.

出版信息

Clin Psychol Psychother. 2010 Jan-Feb;17(1):44-50. doi: 10.1002/cpp.643.

DOI:10.1002/cpp.643
PMID:19701959
Abstract

The Schwartz Outcome Scale-10 (SOS-10) is a 10-item questionnaire that measures the broad domain of psychological well-being and quality of life. The SOS-10 is easy to administer and score. Past research has shown its utility, reliability and validity in different clinical settings (i.e., inpatient, outpatient and non-psychiatry medical settings) and with diverse clinical populations in measuring treatment outcome. The present study looks to extend the construct validity of the SOS-10 to assessing quality of life and psychological health in non-clinical samples as well. The results reveal that the SOS-10 is associated in predicted ways with established measures of attachment, interpersonal distress, alexithymia and the big five model whose construct validity and psychometric soundness has been well documented. The SOS-10 was also associated in predicted ways with ratings of childhood memories and the length of the participants' longest romantic relationship.

摘要

舒瓦茨结果量表-10(SOS-10)是一个包含 10 个项目的问卷,用于衡量广泛的心理幸福感和生活质量。SOS-10 易于管理和评分。过去的研究表明,它在不同的临床环境(即住院、门诊和非精神病医学环境)和具有不同临床人群的治疗结果测量中具有实用性、可靠性和有效性。本研究旨在将 SOS-10 的结构效度扩展到评估非临床样本的生活质量和心理健康。结果表明,SOS-10 与已建立的依恋、人际困扰、述情障碍和大五模型的测量结果以预期的方式相关,这些模型的结构效度和心理测量学效度已得到充分证明。SOS-10 还与童年记忆的评分以及参与者最长的浪漫关系的长度以预期的方式相关。

相似文献

1
Construct validity of the Schwartz outcome scale-10: comparisons to interpersonal distress, adult attachment, alexithymia, the five-factor model, romantic relationship length and ratings of childhood memories.Schwartz 结果量表-10 的结构效度:与人际困扰、成人依恋、述情障碍、五因素模型、浪漫关系长度和儿童期记忆评定的比较。
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2010 Jan-Feb;17(1):44-50. doi: 10.1002/cpp.643.
2
Construct validity of the Schwartz Outcome Scale: validation using a 28-day inpatient chemical rehabilitation patient sample.施瓦茨结果量表的结构效度:使用28天住院化学康复患者样本进行验证
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2012 Apr;200(4):343-8. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0b013e31824cc210.
3
Reliability and validity of the revised experiences in close relationships (ECR-R) self-report measure of adult romantic attachment.成人浪漫依恋的亲密关系经历修订版(ECR-R)自评量表的信度与效度
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2005 Nov;31(11):1524-36. doi: 10.1177/0146167205276865.
4
Well-being and relationship satisfaction of couples dealing with an in vitro fertilization/ intracytoplasmic sperm injection procedure: a multilevel approach on the role of self-criticism, dependency, and romantic attachment.接受体外受精/卵胞浆内单精子注射治疗的夫妇的幸福感和关系满意度:关于自我批评、依赖和浪漫依恋作用的多层次研究。
Fertil Steril. 2009 Feb;91(2):387-94. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.11.052. Epub 2008 Feb 20.
5
How do I love thee? Let me count the ways: parenting during adolescence, attachment styles, and romantic narratives in emerging adulthood.我是如何爱你的?让我一一细数:青少年时期的育儿方式、依恋类型以及成年初期的浪漫叙事。
Dev Psychol. 2011 May;47(3):645-57. doi: 10.1037/a0021814.
6
Measuring romantic love: psychometric properties of the infatuation and attachment scales.测量浪漫爱情:痴迷和依恋量表的心理测量特性。
J Sex Res. 2013;50(8):739-47. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2012.714011. Epub 2012 Oct 25.
7
[The 20-item Toronto alexithymia scale: structural validity, internal consistency and prevalence of alexithymia in a Swiss adolescent sample].[20项多伦多述情障碍量表:瑞士青少年样本中述情障碍的结构效度、内部一致性及患病率]
Encephale. 2007 Dec;33(6):941-6. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2006.12.006. Epub 2007 Sep 4.
8
Reliability and convergent and discriminant validity of the Child Oral Health Impact Profile (COHIP Child's version).儿童口腔健康影响量表(儿童版)的信度、聚合效度和区分效度
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2007 Aug;35 Suppl 1:20-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.2007.0002.x.
9
Cross-cultural alexithymia: validity of the 20-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale in North American aboriginal populations.跨文化述情障碍:20项多伦多述情障碍量表在北美原住民群体中的效度
J Psychosom Res. 2005 Jan;58(1):83-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2004.06.003.
10
Four studies extending the utility of the Schwartz Outcome Scale (SOS-10).四项扩展施瓦茨结果量表(SOS - 10)效用的研究。
J Pers Assess. 2003 Apr;80(2):130-8. doi: 10.1207/S15327752JPA8002_02.

引用本文的文献

1
The Progressive Approach to EMDR Group Therapy for Complex Trauma and Dissociation: A Case-Control Study.针对复杂创伤和解离的眼动脱敏再处理团体治疗的渐进式方法:一项病例对照研究。
Front Psychol. 2018 Feb 13;8:2377. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02377. eCollection 2017.
2
Development of a scale to measure individuals' ratings of peace.衡量个体对和平评价的量表的编制。
Confl Health. 2014 Sep 27;8:17. doi: 10.1186/1752-1505-8-17. eCollection 2014.