Pelekanos Stavros, Koumanou Maria, Koutayas Spiridon-Oumvertos, Zinelis Spiridon, Eliades George
Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, National and Kapodistrian University, Athens, Greece.
Eur J Esthet Dent. 2009 Autumn;4(3):278-92.
The aim of the study was to evaluate the marginal fit of different In-Ceram alumina ceramic cores manufactured by four different techniques. Four groups of four In-Ceram alumina core specimens (Vita), each 0.6 mm in thickness, were fabricated from a master die using four different techniques: Group SL, the slip-cast technique (In-Ceram system); Group CL, the copy-milling technique (Celay system); Group CR, a CAD/CAM system (Cerec inLab system) and Group WO, the electro-deposition dipping technique (Wol-Ceram). After the core specimens were fitted on the master die, they were scanned with the use of a microtomography device (1072 micro-CT, Sky- Scan). Datasets were processed by software (TView v1.1, SkyScan) and 10 vertical sections from each core were generated. On these microtomographic cross-sections the marginal gap (MG) and the absolute marginal discrepancy (MD) were measured in microscale (microm). The slip-cast and the electro-deposition dipping techniques presented the best results of MG with 22 microm and 35 microm, respectively (alpha<5%). The CAD/CAM system presented an MG of 55 microm. In addition, the slip-cast and the electro-deposition dipping techniques presented the best results of MD with 50 microm and 60 microm, respectively (alpha<5%). The slip-cast technique and the Wol-Ceram system presented the best marginal fit, followed by Cerec inLab, which presented clinically acceptable results. Microtomography analysis seemed to be a reliable method of evaluating the marginal fit of dental restorations.
本研究的目的是评估采用四种不同技术制造的不同In-Ceram氧化铝陶瓷核的边缘适合性。使用四种不同技术从母模制作了四组In-Ceram氧化铝核试件(维他公司),每组四个,厚度均为0.6毫米:SL组,注浆成型技术(In-Ceram系统);CL组,复制铣削技术(Celay系统);CR组,CAD/CAM系统(Cerec inLab系统);WO组,电沉积浸渍技术(Wol-Ceram)。将核试件安装在母模上后,使用显微断层扫描设备(1072 micro-CT,Sky-Scan)进行扫描。数据集由软件(TView v1.1,SkyScan)处理,并从每个核生成10个垂直截面。在这些显微断层扫描横截面上,在微观尺度(微米)下测量边缘间隙(MG)和绝对边缘差异(MD)。注浆成型和电沉积浸渍技术的MG结果最佳,分别为22微米和35微米(α<5%)。CAD/CAM系统的MG为55微米。此外,注浆成型和电沉积浸渍技术的MD结果最佳,分别为50微米和60微米(α<5%)。注浆成型技术和Wol-Ceram系统的边缘适合性最佳,其次是Cerec inLab,其结果在临床上是可接受的。显微断层扫描分析似乎是评估牙科修复体边缘适合性的可靠方法。