Pereira Leandro Maruki, de Melo Bárbara Inácio, Oliveira Alex Antônio Maciel, Mendonça Gustavo, Raposo Luís Henrique Araújo, Prudente Marcel Santana, das Neves Flávio Domingues
Department of Occlusion, Fixed Prosthodontics and Dental Materials, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Uberlandia, Uberlandia 38405-320, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Private Practice, Odontocenter, Pompéu 35640-000, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
J Funct Biomater. 2024 Nov 26;15(12):359. doi: 10.3390/jfb15120359.
This study aimed to evaluate the scanning time and marginal fit of CAD/CAM crowns fabricated using different intraoral scanning systems (IOS) (O1-Omnicam 1.0, O2-Omnicam 2.0, PS-Primescan). A standardized, 3D-printed composite resin die with a full-crown tooth preparation was scanned ten times with each IOS, and the scanning time was recorded. Subsequently, lithium disilicate ceramic crowns were designed and milled. The crowns were seated in the die and scanned using micro-computed tomography to assess the marginal fit. Fifty-two measurements were performed for each crown. Data were assessed for homogeneity, and one-way analysis of variance and the Tukey HSD test were performed (α = 0.05). For the analysis of vertical fit categories, the chi-square (Fisher's exact) test (α = 0.05) was used. The mean vertical fit values were: O1-46.7 ± 16.4 μm, O2-33.8 ± 21.4 μm ( = 0.041), and PS-12.3 ± 6.6 μm ( < 0.001). The vertical fit values were further categorized by percentage and representative specimens were scanned with electron microscopy to evaluate adaptation. The mean scanning times were: O1-37.4 ± 3.1 s; O2-34.8 ± 2.7 s; and PS-27.8 ± 1.9 s. Significant differences were observed in the scanning times and marginal fit values of the CAD/CAM ceramic crowns across the different IOS systems, with PS demonstrating the best results. Improvements in IOS hardware and software significantly influence these outcomes.
本研究旨在评估使用不同口腔内扫描系统(IOS)(O1 - Omnicam 1.0、O2 - Omnicam 2.0、PS - Primescan)制作的CAD/CAM全冠的扫描时间和边缘适合性。使用每种IOS对带有全冠牙体预备的标准化3D打印复合树脂代型进行10次扫描,并记录扫描时间。随后,设计并研磨二硅酸锂陶瓷全冠。将全冠就位在代型中,并用微型计算机断层扫描进行扫描以评估边缘适合性。对每个全冠进行52次测量。对数据进行同质性评估,并进行单因素方差分析和Tukey HSD检验(α = 0.05)。对于垂直适合性类别的分析,使用卡方(Fisher精确)检验(α = 0.05)。平均垂直适合值为:O1 - 46.7 ± 16.4μm,O2 - 33.8 ± 21.4μm(P = 0.041),PS - 12.3 ± 6.6μm(P < 0.001)。垂直适合值进一步按百分比分类,并用电镜扫描代表性标本以评估适合性。平均扫描时间为:O1 - 37.4 ± 3.1秒;O2 - 34.8 ± 2.7秒;PS - 27.8 ± 1.9秒。在不同IOS系统的CAD/CAM陶瓷全冠的扫描时间和边缘适合值方面观察到显著差异,PS表现出最佳结果。IOS硬件和软件的改进对这些结果有显著影响。