• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

向患者披露有害的乳房X光检查错误。

Disclosing harmful mammography errors to patients.

作者信息

Gallagher Thomas H, Cook Andrea J, Brenner R James, Carney Patricia A, Miglioretti Diana L, Geller Berta M, Kerlikowske Karla, Onega Tracy L, Rosenberg Robert D, Yankaskas Bonnie C, Lehman Constance D, Elmore Joann G

机构信息

Department of Medicine, and Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Washington, 4311 11th Ave NE, Suite 230, Seattle, WA 98105, USA.

出版信息

Radiology. 2009 Nov;253(2):443-52. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2532082320. Epub 2009 Aug 25.

DOI:10.1148/radiol.2532082320
PMID:19710002
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2770115/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To assess radiologists' attitudes about disclosing errors to patients by using a survey with a vignette involving an error interpreting a patient's mammogram, leading to a delayed cancer diagnosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted an institutional review board-approved survey of 364 radiologists at seven geographically distinct Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium sites that interpreted mammograms from 2005 to 2006. Radiologists received a vignette in which comparison screening mammograms were placed in the wrong order, leading a radiologist to conclude calcifications were decreasing in number when they were actually increasing, delaying a cancer diagnosis. Radiologists were asked (a) how likely they would be to disclose this error, (b) what information they would share, and (c) their malpractice attitudes and experiences.

RESULTS

Two hundred forty-three (67%) of 364 radiologists responded to the disclosure vignette questions. Radiologists' responses to whether they would disclose the error included "definitely not" (9%), "only if asked by the patient" (51%), "probably" (26%), and "definitely" (14%). Regarding information they would disclose, 24% would "not say anything further to the patient," 31% would tell the patient that "the calcifications are larger and are now suspicious for cancer," 30% would state "the calcifications may have increased on your last mammogram, but their appearance was not as worrisome as it is now," and 15% would tell the patient "an error occurred during the interpretation of your last mammogram, and the calcifications had actually increased in number, not decreased." Radiologists' malpractice experiences were not consistently associated with their disclosure responses.

CONCLUSION

Many radiologists report reluctance to disclose a hypothetical mammography error that delayed a cancer diagnosis. Strategies should be developed to increase radiologists' comfort communicating with patients.

摘要

目的

通过一项包含病例 vignette(涉及对患者乳房 X 光检查结果解读错误导致癌症诊断延迟)的调查,评估放射科医生向患者披露错误的态度。

材料与方法

我们在七个地理位置不同的乳腺癌监测联盟站点对 364 名放射科医生进行了一项经机构审查委员会批准的调查,这些放射科医生在 2005 年至 2006 年期间解读乳房 X 光检查结果。放射科医生收到一个病例 vignette,其中对比筛查乳房 X 光片的顺序放错,导致一名放射科医生得出钙化数量在减少的结论,而实际上钙化数量在增加,从而延迟了癌症诊断。放射科医生被问及:(a)他们披露此错误的可能性有多大;(b)他们会分享哪些信息;(c)他们的医疗事故态度和经历。

结果

364 名放射科医生中有 243 名(67%)回复了关于披露病例 vignette 的问题。放射科医生对于是否会披露错误的回答包括“绝对不会”(9%)、“只有在患者询问时才会”(51%)、“可能会”(26%)和“肯定会”(14%)。关于他们会披露的信息,24%的人会“不再向患者透露任何信息”,31%的人会告诉患者“钙化更大了,现在怀疑是癌症”,30%的人会说“在您上次乳房 X 光检查中钙化可能增加了,但当时它们的外观不像现在这么令人担忧”,15%的人会告诉患者“在解读您上次乳房 X 光检查时发生了错误,钙化数量实际上增加了,而不是减少了”。放射科医生的医疗事故经历与他们的披露回复没有始终如一的关联。

结论

许多放射科医生表示不愿披露导致癌症诊断延迟的假设性乳房 X 光检查错误。应制定策略以提高放射科医生与患者沟通时的舒适度。

相似文献

1
Disclosing harmful mammography errors to patients.向患者披露有害的乳房X光检查错误。
Radiology. 2009 Nov;253(2):443-52. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2532082320. Epub 2009 Aug 25.
2
Does litigation influence medical practice? The influence of community radiologists' medical malpractice perceptions and experience on screening mammography.诉讼会影响医疗行为吗?社区放射科医生的医疗事故认知和经验对乳腺钼靶筛查的影响。
Radiology. 2005 Jul;236(1):37-46. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2361040512.
3
"Memory effect" in observer performance studies of mammograms.乳房X光片观察者性能研究中的“记忆效应”
Acad Radiol. 2005 Mar;12(3):286-90. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2004.11.026.
4
When radiologists perform best: the learning curve in screening mammogram interpretation.当放射科医生表现最佳时:筛查性乳房 X 光照片解读的学习曲线。
Radiology. 2009 Dec;253(3):632-40. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2533090070. Epub 2009 Sep 29.
5
Variability in interpretive performance at screening mammography and radiologists' characteristics associated with accuracy.筛查性乳房 X 光摄影中的解释性能的可变性和与准确性相关的放射科医生的特征。
Radiology. 2009 Dec;253(3):641-51. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2533082308. Epub 2009 Oct 28.
6
Radiology trainees' comfort with difficult conversations and attitudes about error disclosure: effect of a communication skills workshop.放射科住院医师在应对困难对话时的舒适度以及对错误披露的态度:沟通技能研讨会的影响
J Am Coll Radiol. 2014 Aug;11(8):781-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2014.01.018. Epub 2014 Mar 27.
7
Radiologists' performance and their enjoyment of interpreting screening mammograms.放射科医生解读乳腺筛查钼靶影像的工作表现及体验。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Feb;192(2):361-9. doi: 10.2214/AJR.08.1647.
8
Predictors of radiologists' perceived risk of malpractice lawsuits in breast imaging.乳腺成像中放射科医生感知到的医疗事故诉讼风险的预测因素。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Feb;192(2):327-33. doi: 10.2214/AJR.07.3346.
9
Radiologists' attitudes and use of mammography audit reports.放射科医生对乳腺摄影审核报告的态度和使用情况。
Acad Radiol. 2010 Jun;17(6):752-60. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2010.02.010.
10
Accuracy of screening mammography interpretation by characteristics of radiologists.根据放射科医生的特征评估乳腺钼靶筛查解读的准确性。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004 Dec 15;96(24):1840-50. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djh333.

引用本文的文献

1
Is the false-positive rate in mammography in North America too high?北美乳房X光检查的假阳性率是否过高?
Br J Radiol. 2016 Sep;89(1065):20160045. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20160045. Epub 2016 Jun 8.
2
The right to be informed and fear of disclosure: sustainability of a full error disclosure policy at an Italian cancer centre/clinic.知情权与对披露的恐惧:意大利癌症中心/诊所全面错误披露政策的可持续性
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Apr 1;15:130. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-0794-3.
3
Stepping out further from the shadows: disclosure of harmful radiologic errors to patients.进一步走出阴影:向患者披露有害的放射学错误。
Radiology. 2012 Feb;262(2):381-6. doi: 10.1148/radiol.11110829.

本文引用的文献

1
Malpractice and breast cancer: perceptions versus reality.医疗事故与乳腺癌:认知与现实
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Feb;192(2):334-6. doi: 10.2214/AJR.08.1317.
2
Predictors of radiologists' perceived risk of malpractice lawsuits in breast imaging.乳腺成像中放射科医生感知到的医疗事故诉讼风险的预测因素。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Feb;192(2):327-33. doi: 10.2214/AJR.07.3346.
3
Narrative review: do state laws make it easier to say "I'm sorry?".叙述性综述:州法律是否使人们更容易说出“我很抱歉”?
Ann Intern Med. 2008 Dec 2;149(11):811-6. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-149-11-200812020-00007.
4
Malpractice allegations and apology laws: benefits and risks for radiologists.医疗事故指控与道歉法:放射科医生面临的益处与风险
J Am Coll Radiol. 2008 Dec;5(12):1186-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2008.08.003.
5
Medical error disclosure among pediatricians: choosing carefully what we might say to parents.儿科医生中的医疗差错披露:谨慎选择我们可能对家长说的话。
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2008 Oct;162(10):922-7. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.162.10.922.
6
The Trojan horse once destroyed a nation, could it destroy the specialty of radiology?特洛伊木马曾毁灭一个国家,它会毁掉放射学专业吗?
Radiology. 2008 Jul;248(1):8-11. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2481080287.
7
Communication in the diagnostic mammography suite: implications for practice and training.乳腺钼靶诊断室中的沟通:对实践和培训的影响。
Acad Radiol. 2008 Apr;15(4):417-24. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2008.01.002.
8
The attitudes and experiences of trainees regarding disclosing medical errors to patients.实习医生向患者披露医疗差错的态度和经历。
Acad Med. 2008 Mar;83(3):250-6. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181636e96.
9
Disclosing harmful medical errors to patients.向患者披露有害的医疗差错。
N Engl J Med. 2007 Jun 28;356(26):2713-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra070568.
10
Disclosing medical errors to patients: attitudes and practices of physicians and trainees.向患者披露医疗差错:医生和实习生的态度与做法。
J Gen Intern Med. 2007 Jul;22(7):988-96. doi: 10.1007/s11606-007-0227-z. Epub 2007 May 1.