Connolly Sarah A, Leser George P, Jardetzky Theodore S, Lamb Robert A
Howard Hughes Medical Institute.
J Virol. 2009 Nov;83(21):10857-68. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01191-09. Epub 2009 Aug 26.
For paramyxoviruses, entry requires a receptor-binding protein (hemagglutinin-neuraminidase [HN], H, or G) and a fusion protein (F). Like other class I viral fusion proteins, F is expressed as a prefusion metastable protein that undergoes a refolding event to induce fusion. HN binding to its receptor triggers F refolding by an unknown mechanism. HN may serve as a clamp that stabilizes F in its prefusion state until HN binds the target cell (the "clamp model"). Alternatively, HN itself may undergo a conformational change after receptor binding that destabilizes F and causes F to trigger (the "provocateur model"). To examine F-HN interactions by bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC), the cytoplasmic tails of parainfluenza virus 5 (PIV5) F and HN were fused to complementary fragments of yellow fluorescent protein (YFP). Coexpression of the BiFC constructs resulted in fluorescence; however, coexpression with unrelated BiFC constructs also produced fluorescence. The affinity of the two halves of YFP presumably superseded the F-HN interaction. Unexpectedly, coexpression of the BiFC F and HN constructs greatly enhanced fusion in multiple cell types. We hypothesize that the increase in fusion occurs because the BiFC tags bring F and HN together more frequently than occurs in a wild-type (wt) scenario. This implies that normally much of wt F is not associated with wt HN, in conflict with the clamp model for activation. Correspondingly, we show that wt PIV5 fusion occurs in an HN concentration-dependent manner. Also inconsistent with the clamp model are the findings that BiFC F does not adopt a postfusion conformation when expressed in the absence of HN and that HN coexpression does not provide resistance to the heat-induced triggering of F. In support of a provocateur model of F activation, we demonstrate by analysis of the morphology of soluble F trimers that the hyperfusogenic mutation S443P has a destabilizing effect on F.
对于副粘病毒而言,进入细胞需要一种受体结合蛋白(血凝素神经氨酸酶[HN]、H或G)和一种融合蛋白(F)。与其他I类病毒融合蛋白一样,F以预融合亚稳蛋白的形式表达,该蛋白会经历重折叠事件以诱导融合。HN与其受体的结合通过未知机制触发F的重折叠。HN可能充当一种夹子,将F稳定在其预融合状态,直到HN与靶细胞结合(“夹子模型”)。或者,HN本身在受体结合后可能会发生构象变化,使F不稳定并导致F触发(“激发剂模型”)。为了通过双分子荧光互补(BiFC)检测F-HN相互作用,将副流感病毒5(PIV5)F和HN的细胞质尾巴与黄色荧光蛋白(YFP)的互补片段融合。BiFC构建体的共表达产生了荧光;然而,与不相关的BiFC构建体共表达也产生了荧光。YFP两半部分的亲和力大概超过了F-HN相互作用。出乎意料的是,BiFC F和HN构建体的共表达在多种细胞类型中极大地增强了融合。我们推测融合增加的发生是因为BiFC标签使F和HN比野生型(wt)情况下更频繁地聚集在一起。这意味着正常情况下,大部分wt F不与wt HN相关联,这与激活的夹子模型相矛盾。相应地,我们表明wt PIV5融合以HN浓度依赖性方式发生。BiFC F在不存在HN的情况下表达时不采用融合后构象以及HN共表达不能提供对热诱导的F触发的抗性这些发现也与夹子模型不一致。为了支持F激活的激发剂模型,我们通过分析可溶性F三聚体的形态证明,超融合突变S443P对F具有去稳定作用。