• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

国家文化如何影响公民获取个人健康信息和知情同意的权利?

How does national culture affect citizens' rights of access to personal health information and informed consent?

机构信息

UQBS, St Lucia, Brisbane, Australia.

出版信息

Health Informatics J. 2009 Sep;15(3):229-43. doi: 10.1177/1460458209337444.

DOI:10.1177/1460458209337444
PMID:19713397
Abstract

Two widely discussed and debated aspects of health law literature are 'informed' consent to medical treatment and the right of access to personal health information. Both are tied to the larger subject of patients' rights, including the right to privacy. This article looks at the issue of informed consent internationally, and goes further to explain some of the inequalities across the world with respect to informed consent and patients' rights legislation via an analysis of the take-up of key legislative attributes in patient consent. Specifically, the effect that national culture, as defined by the GLOBE variables, has on the rate and pattern of adoption of these consent elements is analysed using binary logistic regression to provide evidence of the existence or otherwise of a cultural predicate of the legislative approach. The article concludes by outlining the challenges presented by these differences.

摘要

健康法文献中有两个广受讨论和争议的方面,即医疗治疗的“知情”同意和获取个人健康信息的权利。这两者都与更大的主题——患者权利相关,包括隐私权。本文从国际角度探讨了知情同意的问题,并通过分析患者同意方面的关键立法属性的采用情况,进一步说明了在知情同意和患者权利立法方面,世界各地存在的不平等现象。具体来说,使用二元逻辑回归分析了国家文化(由 GLOBE 变量定义)对这些同意要素的采用率和模式的影响,以证明立法方法是否存在文化前提。文章最后概述了这些差异带来的挑战。

相似文献

1
How does national culture affect citizens' rights of access to personal health information and informed consent?国家文化如何影响公民获取个人健康信息和知情同意的权利?
Health Informatics J. 2009 Sep;15(3):229-43. doi: 10.1177/1460458209337444.
2
[The origin of informed consent].[知情同意的起源]
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2005 Oct;25(5):312-27.
3
Medical records. Enhancing privacy, preserving the common good.医疗记录。增强隐私保护,维护公共利益。
Hastings Cent Rep. 1999 Mar-Apr;29(2):14-23.
4
Finland's strategy and implementation of citizens' access to health information.芬兰公民获取健康信息的策略与实施情况。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2008;137:379-85.
5
Handling consent to patient data access in a hospital setting.在医院环境中处理对患者数据访问的同意问题。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2007;129(Pt 1):242-6.
6
New Zealanders' attitudes towards access to their electronic health records: preliminary results from a national study using vignettes.新西兰人对获取电子健康记录的态度:使用情景模拟进行全国性研究的初步结果。
Health Informatics J. 2009 Sep;15(3):212-28. doi: 10.1177/1460458209337435.
7
Public good, personal privacy: a citizens' deliberation about using medical information for pharmacoepidemiological research.公共利益,个人隐私:公民参与讨论是否将医疗信息用于药物流行病学研究。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2011 Feb;65(2):150-6. doi: 10.1136/jech.2009.097436. Epub 2009 Nov 29.
8
A patient's right of privacy in computerized pharmacy records.患者在计算机化药房记录中的隐私权。
Univ Cincinnati Law Rev. 1998 Winter;66(2):697-746.
9
Access and privacy rights using web security standards to increase patient empowerment.利用网络安全标准保障访问和隐私权,增强患者自主权。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2008;137:275-85.
10
Medical records and your privacy: developing federal legislation to protect patient privacy rights.医疗记录与您的隐私:制定保护患者隐私权的联邦立法。
Am J Law Med. 2000;26(4):453-74.

引用本文的文献

1
Informed consent competency assessment for brain-computer interface clinical research and application in psychiatric disorders: A systematic review.脑机接口在精神疾病临床研究与应用中的知情同意能力评估:一项系统综述。
World J Psychiatry. 2025 Aug 19;15(8):107593. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v15.i8.107593.
2
Assessing the Digital Advancement of Public Health Systems Using Indicators Published in Gray Literature: Narrative Review.利用灰色文献中发布的指标评估公共卫生系统的数字化进展:叙述性综述。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024 Nov 20;10:e63031. doi: 10.2196/63031.
3
"Doctor, Why Didn't You Adopt My Baby?" Observant Participation, Care, and the Simultaneous Practice of Medicine and Anthropology.
Cult Med Psychiatry. 2015 Dec;39(4):614-33. doi: 10.1007/s11013-015-9435-x.