Majkrzak C F, Berk N F, Kienzle P, Perez-Salas U
NIST Center for Neutron Research, Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA.
Langmuir. 2009 Apr 7;25(7):4154-61. doi: 10.1021/la802838t.
It has been a number of years since phase-sensitive specular neutron reflectometry (PSNR) methods employing reference layers were first introduced to help remove the ambiguity inherent in the reconstruction of scattering length density (SLD) depth profiles (Majkrzak, C. F.; Berk, N. F. Physica B 2003, 336, 27) from specular reflectivity measurements. Although a number of scientific applications of PSNR techniques have now been successfully realized (Majkrzak, C. F.; Berk, N. F.; Perez-Salas, U. A. Langmuir 2003, 19, 7796 and references therein), in certain cases practical difficulties remain. In this article, we describe possible solutions to two specific problems: (1) the need for explicit, detailed knowledge of the SLD profile of a given reference layer of finite thickness; and (2) for a reference layer of finite thickness in which only two density variations are possible, how to identify which of two mathematical solutions corresponds to the true physical structure.
自首次引入采用参考层的相敏镜面中子反射测量(PSNR)方法以帮助消除从镜面反射率测量重建散射长度密度(SLD)深度分布(Majkrzak, C. F.; Berk, N. F. Physica B 2003, 336, 27)中固有的模糊性以来,已经过去了数年。尽管PSNR技术的许多科学应用现已成功实现(Majkrzak, C. F.; Berk, N. F.; Perez-Salas, U. A. Langmuir 2003, 19, 7796及其中的参考文献),但在某些情况下仍存在实际困难。在本文中,我们描述了针对两个具体问题的可能解决方案:(1)需要明确、详细地了解给定有限厚度参考层的SLD分布;(2)对于仅可能存在两种密度变化的有限厚度参考层,如何确定两个数学解中的哪一个对应于真实的物理结构。