Suppr超能文献

头孢他啶与亚胺培南/西司他丁治疗重症医院获得性肺炎和败血症患者的对比临床试验。

Comparative clinical trial of ceftazidime and imipenem/cilastatin in patients with severe nosocomial pneumonias and septicaemias.

作者信息

Hartenauer U, Weilemann L S, Bodmann K F, Ritzerfeld W W, Asmus S, Koch E M

机构信息

Klinik und Poliklinik für Anästhesiologie und operative Intensivmedizin, Universität, Münster, F.R. Germany.

出版信息

J Hosp Infect. 1990 Apr;15 Suppl A:61-4. doi: 10.1016/0195-6701(90)90081-x.

Abstract

The efficacy and safety of ceftazidime and imipenem in patients with severe infections was compared in a randomized multi-centre trial. Patients on assisted respiration with clinical signs of pneumonia or septicaemia who had been in hospital for at least 3 days were studied. Twenty-one patients were treated with ceftazidime, 24 with imipenem. The mean duration of treatment was 9 days in both groups. At the end of the trial 17 patients (81%) of the ceftazidime group and 16 patients (67%) in the imipenem group were clinically cured or showed marked improvement. The bacteriological results showed an eradication of the causative pathogens in 17 of 21 cases in the ceftazidime group and 13 of 19 in the imipenem group.

摘要

在一项随机多中心试验中,比较了头孢他啶和亚胺培南对重症感染患者的疗效和安全性。研究对象为因肺炎或败血症临床症状而接受辅助呼吸且已住院至少3天的患者。21例患者接受头孢他啶治疗,24例接受亚胺培南治疗。两组的平均治疗时间均为9天。试验结束时,头孢他啶组17例患者(81%)临床治愈或显著改善,亚胺培南组16例患者(67%)临床治愈或显著改善。细菌学结果显示,头孢他啶组21例中有17例病原菌被清除,亚胺培南组19例中有13例病原菌被清除。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验