Hartenauer U, Weilemann L S, Bodmann K F, Ritzerfeld W W, Asmus S, Koch E M
Klinik und Poliklinik für Anästhesiologie und operative Intensivmedizin, Universität, Münster, F.R. Germany.
J Hosp Infect. 1990 Apr;15 Suppl A:61-4. doi: 10.1016/0195-6701(90)90081-x.
The efficacy and safety of ceftazidime and imipenem in patients with severe infections was compared in a randomized multi-centre trial. Patients on assisted respiration with clinical signs of pneumonia or septicaemia who had been in hospital for at least 3 days were studied. Twenty-one patients were treated with ceftazidime, 24 with imipenem. The mean duration of treatment was 9 days in both groups. At the end of the trial 17 patients (81%) of the ceftazidime group and 16 patients (67%) in the imipenem group were clinically cured or showed marked improvement. The bacteriological results showed an eradication of the causative pathogens in 17 of 21 cases in the ceftazidime group and 13 of 19 in the imipenem group.
在一项随机多中心试验中,比较了头孢他啶和亚胺培南对重症感染患者的疗效和安全性。研究对象为因肺炎或败血症临床症状而接受辅助呼吸且已住院至少3天的患者。21例患者接受头孢他啶治疗,24例接受亚胺培南治疗。两组的平均治疗时间均为9天。试验结束时,头孢他啶组17例患者(81%)临床治愈或显著改善,亚胺培南组16例患者(67%)临床治愈或显著改善。细菌学结果显示,头孢他啶组21例中有17例病原菌被清除,亚胺培南组19例中有13例病原菌被清除。