• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

个人对什么负责?——一个用于探索在公共资助的医疗保健系统中私人融资适宜性的概念框架。

Individual responsibility for what? - a conceptual framework for exploring the suitability of private financing in a publicly funded health-care system.

机构信息

aCenter for Medical Technology Assessment, Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.

出版信息

Health Econ Policy Law. 2010 Apr;5(2):201-23. doi: 10.1017/S174413310999017X. Epub 2009 Sep 2.

DOI:10.1017/S174413310999017X
PMID:19723367
Abstract

Policymakers in publicly funded health-care systems are frequently required to make intricate decisions on which health-care services to include or exclude from the basic health-care package. Although it seems likely that the concept of individual responsibility is an essential feature of such decisions, it is rarely explicitly articulated or evaluated in health policy. This paper presents a tentative conceptual framework for exploring when health-care services contain characteristics that facilitate individual responsibility through private financing. Six attributes for exploring the suitability of private financing for specific health-care commodities are identified: (i) it should enable individuals to value the need and quality both before and after utilization; (ii) it should be targeted toward individuals with a reasonable level of individual autonomy; (iii) it should be associated with low levels of positive externalities; (iv) it should be associated with a demand sufficient to generate a private market; (v) it should be associated with payments affordable for most individuals; and finally, (vi) it should be associated with 'lifestyle enhancements' rather than 'medical necessities'. The tentative framework enables exploration of individual responsibility connected to health care as a heterogeneous group of commodities, and allows policymakers to make decisions on rationing by design rather than default.

摘要

在公共资助的医疗保健系统中,政策制定者经常需要做出复杂的决策,决定将哪些医疗保健服务纳入或排除在基本医疗保健套餐之外。尽管个人责任的概念似乎是此类决策的一个基本特征,但在卫生政策中很少明确阐述或评估。本文提出了一个初步的概念框架,用于探讨何时医疗保健服务通过私人融资具有促进个人责任的特征。确定了探索私人融资是否适合特定医疗保健商品的六个属性:(i)它应该使个人能够在使用前后评估需求和质量;(ii)它应该针对具有合理个人自主权水平的个人;(iii)它应该与低水平的正外部性相关联;(iv)它应该与足以产生私人市场的需求相关联;(v)它应该与大多数个人负担得起的支付相关联;最后,(vi)它应该与“生活方式增强”而非“医疗必需品”相关联。该初步框架使人们能够探索与作为一组异质商品的医疗保健相关的个人责任,并使政策制定者能够通过设计而不是默认做出配给决策。

相似文献

1
Individual responsibility for what? - a conceptual framework for exploring the suitability of private financing in a publicly funded health-care system.个人对什么负责?——一个用于探索在公共资助的医疗保健系统中私人融资适宜性的概念框架。
Health Econ Policy Law. 2010 Apr;5(2):201-23. doi: 10.1017/S174413310999017X. Epub 2009 Sep 2.
2
Determining what should be included in a publicly funded health care system: reflecting on 'Individual responsibility for what? A conceptual framework for exploring the suitability of private financing in a publicly funded health-care system'.
Health Econ Policy Law. 2015 Oct;10(4):425-30. doi: 10.1017/S174413311500016X. Epub 2015 Jun 9.
3
Individual responsibility for healthcare financing: application of an analytical framework exploring the suitability of private financing of assistive devices.个人对医疗保健融资的责任:应用分析框架探索辅助设备私人融资的适宜性。
Scand J Public Health. 2012 Dec;40(8):784-94. doi: 10.1177/1403494812462459. Epub 2012 Oct 30.
4
Reforms are needed to increase public funding and curb demand for private care in Israel's health system.以色列的医疗体系需要改革,以增加公共资金投入,并抑制对私人医疗服务的需求。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Apr;32(4):724-33. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.0283.
5
The Gateway Paper--financing health in Pakistan and its linkage with health reforms.《门户文件》——巴基斯坦的卫生筹资及其与卫生改革的联系。
J Pak Med Assoc. 2006 Dec;56(12 Suppl 4):S25-42.
6
Redistribution or horizontal equity in Hong Kong's mixed public-private health system: a policy conundrum.香港公私混合医疗体系中的再分配或横向公平:一个政策难题。
Health Econ. 2009 Jan;18(1):37-54. doi: 10.1002/hec.1342.
7
Equity in Irish health care financing: measurement issues.爱尔兰医疗保健融资中的公平性:衡量问题。
Health Econ Policy Law. 2010 Apr;5(2):149-69. doi: 10.1017/S1744133109990168. Epub 2009 Sep 1.
8
Informal payments in the health sector: a case study from Turkey.卫生部门的非正式支付:来自土耳其的案例研究。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2007 Jul-Aug;26(4):1029-39. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.26.4.1029.
9
India's BJP Government and health: 1 year on.印度人民党政府与医疗卫生:一年之后
Lancet. 2015 May 23;385(9982):2031-2. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60977-1.
10
Reform of health care financing systems.医疗保健筹资体系改革。
J S C Med Assoc. 2008 Apr;104(4):106; author reply 106-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Commodity security frameworks for health planning.卫生规划的商品安全框架。
Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm. 2021 May 17;2:100025. doi: 10.1016/j.rcsop.2021.100025. eCollection 2021 Jun.
2
Application of Managed Entry Agreements for Innovative Therapies in Different Settings and Combinations: A Feasibility Analysis.管理准入协议在不同环境和组合下对创新疗法的应用:可行性分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Nov 10;17(22):8309. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17228309.
3
Are Individuals Luck Egalitarians? - An Experiment on the Influence of Brute and Option Luck on Social Preferences.
个体是运气平等主义者吗?——关于原生运气和选项运气对社会偏好影响的一项实验
Front Psychol. 2017 Mar 29;8:460. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00460. eCollection 2017.
4
Effectiveness of a quality improvement intervention targeting cardiovascular risk factors: are patients responsive to information and encouragement by mail or post?针对心血管危险因素的质量改进干预措施的有效性:患者对邮件或信件中的信息及鼓励有反应吗?
Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2013;9:13-20. doi: 10.2147/VHRM.S39919. Epub 2013 Feb 13.
5
Co-responsibility: a new horizon for today's health care?共同责任:当今医疗保健的新视野?
Health Care Anal. 2012 Jun;20(2):139-51. doi: 10.1007/s10728-011-0175-y.