Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Health Technology and Informatics, Hong Kong, China.
Br J Radiol. 2010 Mar;83(987):252-6. doi: 10.1259/bjr/33094251. Epub 2009 Sep 1.
During gated intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) treatment for patients with inoperable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the end-expiration (EE) phase of respiratory is more stable, whereas end-inspiration (EI) spares more normal lung tissue. This study compared the relative plan quality based on dosimetric and biological indices of the planning target volume (PTV) and organs at risk (OARs) between EI and EE in gated IMRT. 16 Stage I NSCLC patients, who were scanned by four-dimensional CT, were recruited and re-planned. An IMRT plan of a prescription dose of 60 Gy per respiratory phase was computed using the iPlan treatment planning system. The heart, spinal cord, both lungs and PTV were outlined. The tumour control probability for the PTV and normal tissue complication probability for all OARs in the EE and EI phases were nearly the same; only the normal tissue complication probability of the heart in EE was slightly lower. Conversely, the conformation number of the PTV, V20 of the left lung, V30 of both lungs, Dmax of the heart and spinal cord, V10 of the heart and D5% of the spinal cord were better in EE, whereas D(mean) of the PTV, V20 of the right lung and maximum doses of both lungs were better in EI. No differences reached statistical significance (p<0.05) except Dmax of the spinal cord (p=0.033). Overall, there was no expected clinical impact between EI and EE in the study. However, based on the practicality factor, EI is recommended for patients who can perform breath-hold; otherwise, EE is recommended.
在无法手术的非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的门控强度调制放疗(IMRT)治疗中,呼吸末期(EE)相位更稳定,而吸气末期(EI)则能更多地保护正常肺组织。本研究比较了门控 IMRT 中 EI 和 EE 时基于计划靶区(PTV)和危及器官(OAR)的剂量学和生物学指标的相对计划质量。招募了 16 名接受了四维 CT 扫描的 I 期 NSCLC 患者并重新进行了计划。使用 iPlan 治疗计划系统计算了每个呼吸相位处方剂量为 60Gy 的 IMRT 计划。勾画了心脏、脊髓、双肺和 PTV。PTV 的肿瘤控制概率和所有 OAR 的正常组织并发症概率在 EE 和 EI 相位几乎相同;仅 EE 时心脏的正常组织并发症概率略低。相反,PTV 的适形指数、左肺的 V20、双肺的 V30、心脏和脊髓的 Dmax、心脏的 V10 和脊髓的 D5%在 EE 时更好,而 PTV 的 D(平均)、右肺的 V20 和双肺的最大剂量在 EI 时更好。除了脊髓的 Dmax(p=0.033)外,其他指标差异均无统计学意义(p<0.05)。总体而言,研究中 EI 和 EE 之间没有预期的临床影响。然而,基于实用性因素,对于能够进行屏气的患者推荐使用 EI,否则推荐使用 EE。