Suppr超能文献

氯吡格雷与普拉格雷联用或不联用质子泵抑制剂的药效学效应及临床疗效:两项随机试验的分析

Pharmacodynamic effect and clinical efficacy of clopidogrel and prasugrel with or without a proton-pump inhibitor: an analysis of two randomised trials.

作者信息

O'Donoghue Michelle L, Braunwald Eugene, Antman Elliott M, Murphy Sabina A, Bates Eric R, Rozenman Yoseph, Michelson Alan D, Hautvast Raymond W, Ver Lee Peter N, Close Sandra L, Shen Lei, Mega Jessica L, Sabatine Marc S, Wiviott Stephen D

机构信息

Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Lancet. 2009 Sep 19;374(9694):989-997. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61525-7. Epub 2009 Aug 31.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) are often prescribed in combination with thienopyridines. Conflicting data exist as to whether PPIs diminish the efficacy of clopidogrel. We assessed the association between PPI use, measures of platelet function, and clinical outcomes for patients treated with clopidogrel or prasugrel.

METHODS

In the PRINCIPLE-TIMI 44 trial, the primary outcome was inhibition of platelet aggregation at 6 h assessed by light-transmission aggregometry. In the TRITON-TIMI 38 trial, the primary endpoint was the composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke. In both studies, PPI use was at physician's discretion. We used a multivariable Cox model with propensity score to assess the association of PPI use with clinical outcomes.

FINDINGS

In the PRINCIPLE-TIMI 44 trial, 201 patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention were randomly assigned to prasugrel (n=102) or high-dose clopidogrel (n=99). Mean inhibition of platelet aggregation was significantly lower for patients on a PPI than for those not on a PPI at 6 h after a 600 mg clopidogrel loading dose (23.2+/-19.5% vs 35.2+/-20.9%, p=0.02), whereas a more modest difference was seen with and without a PPI after a 60 mg loading dose of prasugrel (69.6+/-13.5% vs 76.7+/-12.4%, p=0.054). In the TRITON-TIMI 38 trial, 13,608 patients with an acute coronary syndrome were randomly assigned to prasugrel (n=6813) or clopidogrel (n=6795). In this study, 33% (n=4529) of patients were on a PPI at randomisation. No association existed between PPI use and risk of the primary endpoint for patients treated with clopidogrel (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.94, 95% CI 0.80-1.11) or prasugrel (1.00, 0.84-1.20).

INTERPRETATION

The current findings do not support the need to avoid concomitant use of PPIs, when clinically indicated, in patients receiving clopidogrel or prasugrel.

FUNDING

Daiichi Sankyo Company Limited and Eli Lilly and Company sponsored the trials. This analysis had no funding.

摘要

背景

质子泵抑制剂(PPIs)常与噻吩并吡啶类药物联合使用。关于PPIs是否会降低氯吡格雷的疗效,存在相互矛盾的数据。我们评估了使用PPIs、血小板功能指标与接受氯吡格雷或普拉格雷治疗患者的临床结局之间的关联。

方法

在PRINCIPLE-TIMI 44试验中,主要结局是通过光透射聚集法评估6小时时的血小板聚集抑制情况。在TRITON-TIMI 38试验中,主要终点是心血管死亡、心肌梗死或卒中的复合终点。在两项研究中,PPIs的使用由医生自行决定。我们使用带有倾向评分的多变量Cox模型来评估PPIs使用与临床结局之间的关联。

研究结果

在PRINCIPLE-TIMI 44试验中,201例接受择期经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的患者被随机分配至普拉格雷组(n = 102)或高剂量氯吡格雷组(n = 99)。在给予600mg氯吡格雷负荷剂量后6小时,使用PPIs的患者血小板聚集平均抑制率显著低于未使用PPIs的患者(23.2±19.5%对35.2±20.9%,p = 0.02),而给予60mg普拉格雷负荷剂量后,使用和未使用PPIs的患者之间差异较小(69.6±13.5%对76.7±12.4%,p = 0.054)。在TRITON-TIMI 38试验中,13608例急性冠状动脉综合征患者被随机分配至普拉格雷组(n = 6813)或氯吡格雷组(n = 6795)。在本研究中,33%(n = 4529)的患者在随机分组时使用PPIs。对于接受氯吡格雷治疗的患者(调整后风险比[HR] 0.94,95%可信区间[CI] 0.80 - 1.11)或普拉格雷治疗的患者(1.00,0.84 - 1.20),使用PPIs与主要终点风险之间不存在关联。

解读

目前的研究结果不支持在临床有指征时,接受氯吡格雷或普拉格雷治疗的患者需要避免同时使用PPIs。

资助

第一三共株式会社和礼来公司赞助了这些试验。本分析无资金支持。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验