Suppr超能文献

一种针对接受双联抗血小板治疗的急性冠脉综合征患者胃肠道出血风险分层及质子泵抑制剂疗效的新方法:一项全国性回顾性队列研究。

A Novel Approach to Gastrointestinal Bleeding Risk Stratification and Proton Pump Inhibitor Effectiveness in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome on Dual Antiplatelet Therapy: A Nationwide Retrospective Cohort Study.

作者信息

Lee Mee Yeon, Heo Kyu-Nam, Shin Jaekyu, Lee Ju-Yeun

机构信息

College of Pharmacy and Research Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Seoul National University, 1, Gwanak-Ro, Gwanak-Gu, Seoul, 08826, Republic of Korea.

Department of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, University of California, San Francisco, CA, 94607, USA.

出版信息

Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2025 Apr 26. doi: 10.1007/s10557-025-07702-4.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are effective in preventing gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding in high-risk patients on dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). Existing criteria for high GI bleeding risk, such as those from the American Heart Association (AHA), may not fully reflect East Asian patient profiles. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of PPIs in preventing GI bleeding across DAPT combinations, stratified by GI bleeding risk using the Academic Research Consortium High Bleeding Risk (ARC-HBR) criteria in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS).

METHODS

A retrospective cohort of 93,153 patients with ACS initiating DAPT (2018-2020) was analyzed using the Korean National Health Insurance database. Modified ARC-HBR (mARC-HBR) criteria tailored to claims data were compared with AHA criteria in terms of concordance and performance. PPI effects on GI bleeding were analyzed by mARC-HBR risk groups over a 3-year observation period.

RESULTS

The mARC-HBR criteria identified three times more high-risk patients than the AHA criteria, demonstrating higher sensitivity (38.9% vs. 11.1%, p < 0.001) while maintaining a relatively high specificity (both > 70%). While PPI use offered no benefit for low-risk patients, it was associated with a 25.8% lower GI bleeding risk in high-risk patients, with the most pronounced effect observed in those on the aspirin/ticagrelor combination.

CONCLUSION

The mARC-HBR criteria enhance the identification of high GI bleeding risk patients with ACS and may inform targeted PPI use, given the observed associations suggesting potential benefit in high-risk ticagrelor users and limited effect in low-risk groups.

摘要

目的

质子泵抑制剂(PPIs)在预防接受双联抗血小板治疗(DAPT)的高危患者胃肠道(GI)出血方面有效。现有的高GI出血风险标准,如美国心脏协会(AHA)的标准,可能无法完全反映东亚患者的情况。本研究旨在评估在急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者中,使用学术研究联盟高出血风险(ARC-HBR)标准按GI出血风险分层,PPIs在预防不同DAPT组合的GI出血方面的有效性。

方法

利用韩国国家健康保险数据库对93153例开始接受DAPT(2018 - 2020年)的ACS患者进行回顾性队列分析。将针对索赔数据定制的改良ARC-HBR(mARC-HBR)标准与AHA标准在一致性和性能方面进行比较。在3年观察期内,按mARC-HBR风险组分析PPIs对GI出血的影响。

结果

mARC-HBR标准识别出的高危患者是AHA标准的三倍,显示出更高的敏感性(38.9%对11.1%,p < 0.001),同时保持相对较高的特异性(均> 70%)。虽然PPI的使用对低风险患者没有益处,但在高风险患者中,它与GI出血风险降低25.8%相关,在使用阿司匹林/替格瑞洛组合的患者中观察到的效果最为明显。

结论

mARC-HBR标准增强了对ACS高GI出血风险患者的识别,鉴于观察到的关联表明对高风险替格瑞洛使用者有潜在益处,而对低风险组影响有限,这可能为靶向使用PPI提供依据。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验