ALGOS, Rovira i Virgili University, Catalonia, Spain.
Eur J Pain. 2009 Nov;13(10):1089-95. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2009.07.002. Epub 2009 Sep 1.
The aim of this work was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Numerical Rating Scale-11 (NRS-11) when used to assess pediatric pain intensity. We performed two studies: 175 schoolchildren, aged 8-12, participated in Study 1 and 63 children undergoing surgery and aged 6-16, participated in Study 2. The NRS-11 showed (a) adequate convergent construct validity when correlated with the Faces Pain Scale - Revised (FPS-R; r(1)=0.78, r(2)=0.93); (b) adequate discriminant validity in relation to measures of pain-related affect (z(1)=3.55, z(2)=7.62) and disability (z(1)=7.62, z(2)=6.83); and (c) adequate criterion-related validity using measures of pain-related affect (r(1)=.58, r(2)=.66), disability (r(1)=0.22, r(2)=.39), and quality of life (r(2)=-.46). Schoolchildren were asked whether they preferred using the NRS-11 or the FPS-R when reporting the intensity of their pain. While both sexes and both the younger and older age groups preferred the FPS-R, this preference was more marked among girls and younger children. The NRS-11 has shown an acceptable level of validity for assessing pain intensity in both samples, however, additional research is needed in order to fully clarify the lower age limit in which the NRS-11 can be used.
本研究旨在评估数值评分量表 11(NRS-11)用于评估儿童疼痛强度的心理测量特性。我们进行了两项研究:175 名 8-12 岁的学龄儿童参加了研究 1,63 名 6-16 岁接受手术的儿童参加了研究 2。NRS-11 显示:(a)与面部疼痛评分修订版(FPS-R;r(1)=0.78,r(2)=0.93)相关时,具有足够的收敛结构有效性;(b)与疼痛相关的情感(z(1)=3.55,z(2)=7.62)和残疾(z(1)=7.62,z(2)=6.83)的测量值相关时,具有足够的区分有效性;(c)使用疼痛相关的情感(r(1)=.58,r(2)=.66)、残疾(r(1)=0.22,r(2)=0.39)和生活质量(r(2)=-.46)的测量值具有足够的标准相关有效性。研究要求学龄儿童在报告疼痛强度时,告知他们更喜欢使用 NRS-11 还是 FPS-R。虽然男女以及年龄较小和较大的年龄组都更喜欢 FPS-R,但女孩和年龄较小的儿童的这种偏好更为明显。NRS-11 在两个样本中评估疼痛强度都显示出了可接受的有效性水平,然而,需要进一步的研究以充分明确 NRS-11 可以使用的较低年龄限制。