• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童疼痛强度量表的信度、效度及偏好性评估:加泰罗尼亚语版面部疼痛量表修订版

Evaluation of reliability, validity, and preference for a pediatric pain intensity scale: the Catalan version of the faces pain scale--revised.

作者信息

Miró Jordi, Huguet Anna

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Rovira i Virgili University, Catalonia, Spain.

出版信息

Pain. 2004 Sep;111(1-2):59-64. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2004.05.023.

DOI:10.1016/j.pain.2004.05.023
PMID:15327809
Abstract

The main objective of this research was to determine the initial psychometric properties of the Faces Pain Scale - Revised (FPS-R) as a measure of pain intensity for use with Catalan children and adolescents. Results of the Catalan version of this scale (FPS-R-C) are similar to those obtained with the original instrument. In order to assess the validity and reliability of the FPS-R-C, two different samples were studied. The first sample contained 124 hospitalized children and adolescents (mean age 10.86; SD 2.5). They were asked to rate their affective state on the Faces Affective Scale (FAS) and the intensity of their pain on the FPS-R-C and the Coloured Analogue Scale (CAS). The pain intensity ratings reported with FPS-R-C and CAS were very similar, correlations ranging from 0.83 to 0.9. The relationship between the intensity of pain experienced and children's affective state was also statistically significant (R = 32, P < 0.01). The second sample contained 247 schoolchildren (mean age 9.43; SD 1.55), who were asked to imagine themselves in eight hypothetical painful situations and rate the degree of pain using the FPS-R-C and the CAS (correlations ranging from 0.83 to 0.96). Test-retest correlations on this questionnaire (Painful Events Inventory) ranged from 0.26 to 0.70. Overall, these results provide preliminary evidence of the reliability, and convergent and criterion-related validity of the FPS-R-C. Moreover, all participating subjects were asked to choose the pain scale they preferred the most. Our data suggest that, regardless of their age and/or gender, the subjects prefer the FPS-R-C to the CAS.

摘要

本研究的主要目的是确定修订版面部疼痛量表(FPS-R)作为加泰罗尼亚儿童和青少年疼痛强度测量工具的初始心理测量特性。该量表加泰罗尼亚语版本(FPS-R-C)的结果与原始工具所得结果相似。为了评估FPS-R-C的有效性和可靠性,对两个不同样本进行了研究。第一个样本包括124名住院儿童和青少年(平均年龄10.86岁;标准差2.5)。要求他们在面部情感量表(FAS)上对自己的情感状态进行评分,并在FPS-R-C和彩色模拟量表(CAS)上对疼痛强度进行评分。FPS-R-C和CAS报告的疼痛强度评分非常相似,相关性在0.83至0.9之间。经历的疼痛强度与儿童情感状态之间的关系也具有统计学意义(R = 32,P < 0.01)。第二个样本包括247名学童(平均年龄9.43岁;标准差1.55),要求他们想象自己处于八种假设的疼痛情境中,并使用FPS-R-C和CAS对疼痛程度进行评分(相关性在0.83至0.96之间)。该问卷(疼痛事件量表)的重测相关性在0.26至0.70之间。总体而言,这些结果为FPS-R-C的可靠性、收敛效度和与标准相关的效度提供了初步证据。此外,要求所有参与的受试者选择他们最喜欢的疼痛量表。我们的数据表明,无论年龄和/或性别如何,受试者更喜欢FPS-R-C而不是CAS。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of reliability, validity, and preference for a pediatric pain intensity scale: the Catalan version of the faces pain scale--revised.儿童疼痛强度量表的信度、效度及偏好性评估:加泰罗尼亚语版面部疼痛量表修订版
Pain. 2004 Sep;111(1-2):59-64. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2004.05.023.
2
[The Color Analog Scale: a valid instrument for measuring pain intensity in Catalan-speaking children?].[颜色模拟量表:一种用于测量加泰罗尼亚语儿童疼痛强度的有效工具?]
Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2007 Apr;54(4):208-12.
3
Evaluation of reliability, validity, and preference for a pain intensity scale for use with the elderly.对一种用于老年人的疼痛强度量表的信度、效度及偏好性评估。
J Pain. 2005 Nov;6(11):727-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2005.06.005.
4
Evidence for the use of a numerical rating scale to assess the intensity of pediatric pain.用于评估儿童疼痛强度的数字评分量表的使用证据。
Eur J Pain. 2009 Nov;13(10):1089-95. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2009.07.002. Epub 2009 Sep 1.
5
Reliability and validity of the Faces Pain Scale with older adults.老年人面部疼痛量表的信度和效度
Int J Nurs Stud. 2006 May;43(4):447-56. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2006.01.001. Epub 2006 Feb 28.
6
Postoperative pain intensity assessment: a comparison of four scales in Chinese adults.术后疼痛强度评估:中国成年人四种量表的比较
Pain Med. 2007 Apr;8(3):223-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2007.00296.x.
7
Development of a multidimensional measure for recurrent abdominal pain in children: population-based studies in three settings.儿童复发性腹痛多维测量方法的开发:在三种环境下开展的基于人群的研究
Pediatrics. 2005 Feb;115(2):e210-5. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1412.
8
Children's ratings of the intensity and unpleasantness of post-operative pain using facial expression scales.儿童使用面部表情量表对术后疼痛强度和不愉快程度的评分。
Eur J Pain. 2004 Apr;8(2):119-27. doi: 10.1016/S1090-3801(03)00087-9.
9
Is the verbal numerical rating scale a valid tool for assessing pain intensity in children below 8 years of age?口头数字评分量表是否可有效用于评估 8 岁以下儿童的疼痛强度?
J Pain. 2013 Mar;14(3):297-304. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2012.12.004. Epub 2013 Feb 4.
10
Validation of the Turkish version of the Quebec back pain disability scale for patients with low back pain.针对腰痛患者的魁北克腰痛残疾量表土耳其语版本的验证
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Mar 15;34(6):E219-24. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181971e2d.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of Nonpharmacological Behavioural Interventions in Managing Dental Fear and Anxiety among Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.非药物行为干预对儿童牙科恐惧和焦虑的管理效果:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Feb 23;12(5):537. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12050537.
2
Considerations for Pain Assessments in Cancer Patients: A Narrative Review of the Latin American Perspective.癌症患者疼痛评估的考量因素:拉丁美洲视角的叙述性综述
Cureus. 2023 Jun 22;15(6):e40804. doi: 10.7759/cureus.40804. eCollection 2023 Jun.
3
Pain assessment tools in paediatric palliative care: A systematic review of psychometric properties and recommendations for clinical practice.
儿科姑息治疗中的疼痛评估工具:心理测量特性的系统评价及临床实践建议。
Palliat Med. 2022 Jan;36(1):30-43. doi: 10.1177/02692163211049309. Epub 2021 Dec 29.
4
The Arabic Version of the Faces Pain Scale-Revised: Cultural Adaptation, Validity, and Reliability Properties When Used with Children and Adolescents.修订版面部疼痛量表的阿拉伯语版本:与儿童和青少年一起使用时的文化适应性、有效性和可靠性特性。
Children (Basel). 2021 Dec 15;8(12):1184. doi: 10.3390/children8121184.
5
Identifying pain trajectories in children and youth with cerebral palsy: a pilot study.识别脑瘫儿童和青少年的疼痛轨迹:一项试点研究。
BMC Pediatr. 2021 Sep 29;21(1):428. doi: 10.1186/s12887-021-02861-3.
6
Clinical Holding in Pediatric Venipuncture: Caring by Empowering the Caregiver.临床儿科静脉穿刺中的握持:通过赋权照顾者来护理。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 11;18(14):7403. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18147403.
7
Validity and Utility of Four Pain Intensity Measures for Use in International Research.四种疼痛强度测量方法在国际研究中的有效性和实用性。
J Pain Res. 2021 Apr 21;14:1129-1139. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S303305. eCollection 2021.
8
Enhancing validity, reliability and participation in self-reported health outcome measurement for children and young people: a systematic review of recall period, response scale format, and administration modality.提高儿童和青少年自我报告健康结果测量的有效性、可靠性和参与度:对回忆期、反应量表格式和管理方式的系统回顾。
Qual Life Res. 2021 Jul;30(7):1803-1832. doi: 10.1007/s11136-021-02814-4. Epub 2021 Mar 18.
9
First evaluation of tapentadol oral solution for the treatment of moderate to severe acute pain in children aged 6 to <18.首次评估曲马多口服溶液用于治疗6至<18岁儿童中重度急性疼痛的效果。
J Pain Res. 2019 Jun 28;12:1925-1936. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S197348. eCollection 2019.
10
Do Commonly Used Measures of Pain Intensity Only Reflect Pain Intensity in Youths With Bothersome Pain and a Physical Disability?常用的疼痛强度测量方法仅反映有困扰性疼痛和身体残疾的青少年的疼痛强度吗?
Front Pediatr. 2019 Jun 20;7:229. doi: 10.3389/fped.2019.00229. eCollection 2019.