Cardiology Institute, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy.
Eur Heart J. 2009 Sep;30(18):2193-203. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehp348. Epub 2009 Sep 2.
Thrombectomy in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is associated to better myocardial reperfusion. However, no single trial was adequately powered to asses the impact of thrombectomy on long-term clinical outcome and to identify patients at higher benefit. Thus, we sought to assess these issues in a collaborative individual patient-data pooled analysis of randomized studies (study acronym: ATTEMPT, number of registration: NCT00766740).
Individual data of 2686 patients enrolled in 11 trials entered the pooled analysis. Primary endpoint of the study was all-cause mortality. Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were considered as the occurrence of all-cause death and/or target lesion/vessel revascularization and/or myocardial infarction (MI). Subgroups analysis was planned according to type of thrombectomy device (manual or non-manual), diabetic status, IIb/IIIa-inhibitor therapy, ischaemic time, infarct-related artery, pre-PCI TIMI flow. Clinical follow-up was available in 2674 (99.6%) patients at a median of 365 days. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that allocation to thrombectomy was associated with significantly lower all-cause mortality (P = 0.049). Thrombectomy was also associated with significantly reduced MACE (P = 0.011) and death + MI rate during the follow-up (P = 0.015). Subgroups analysis showed that thrombectomy is associated to improved survival in patients treated with IIb/IIIa-inhibitors (P = 0.045) and that the survival benefit is confined to patients treated in manual thrombectomy trials (P = 0.011).
The present large pooled analysis of randomized trials suggests that thrombectomy (in particular manual thrombectomy) significantly improves the clinical outcome in patients with STEMI undergoing mechanical reperfusion and that its effect may be additional to that of IIb/IIIa-inhibitors.
在接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者中,血栓切除术与更好的心肌再灌注相关。然而,没有一项单独的试验有足够的效力来评估血栓切除术对长期临床结果的影响,并确定受益更高的患者。因此,我们试图在一项针对随机研究的协作个体患者数据汇总分析(研究缩写:ATTEMPT,注册数量:NCT00766740)中评估这些问题。
11 项试验中纳入的 2686 名患者的个体数据进入了汇总分析。研究的主要终点是全因死亡率。主要不良心脏事件(MACE)被定义为全因死亡和/或靶病变/血管血运重建和/或心肌梗死(MI)的发生。根据血栓切除术装置的类型(手动或非手动)、糖尿病状态、IIb/IIIa 抑制剂治疗、缺血时间、梗死相关动脉、PCI 前 TIMI 血流,计划了亚组分析。在 2674 名(99.6%)患者中获得了中位随访 365 天的临床随访。Kaplan-Meier 分析表明,血栓切除术组的全因死亡率显著降低(P=0.049)。血栓切除术也与 MACE 显著减少(P=0.011)和随访期间的死亡+MI 率显著降低相关(P=0.015)。亚组分析表明,在接受 IIb/IIIa 抑制剂治疗的患者中,血栓切除术与生存率的提高相关(P=0.045),并且生存获益仅限于接受手动血栓切除术试验的患者(P=0.011)。
本项针对随机试验的大型汇总分析表明,血栓切除术(特别是手动血栓切除术)显著改善了接受机械再灌注治疗的 STEMI 患者的临床结局,其作用可能超过 IIb/IIIa 抑制剂。