Skadsberg Nicholas D, Kaiser Daniel R, Fischer Trent M, Iaizzo Paul A
Medtronic, Inc., Minneapolis, MN 55432, USA.
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2009 Dec;26(3):185-94. doi: 10.1007/s10840-009-9431-6.
Right ventricular (RV) pacing has been associated with abnormal cardiac electrical and mechanical dyssynchrony, resulting in impaired global and regional ventricular pump function. This study aimed to characterize the relative effects of pacing site on left ventricular (LV) activation patterns and associated hemodynamic performances.
Acute pacing was performed in anesthetized swine (n=10) instrumented for RV and LV pressure, noncontact mapping (NCM) of endocardial unipolar electrograms, surface ECG, aortic flow, and sonomicrometry. Bipolar endocardial pacing leads were positioned in the right atrial appendage (RAA), RV apex (RVA), and RV outflow tract (RVOT), while bipolar epicardial leads were positioned on the LV-free wall (LVFW) and LV apex (LVA).
LVFW and RVA pacing induced the largest increase in intraventricular electrical dyssynchrony (IVED; 32.2+/-10 ms, 21.7+/-4.1 ms, respectively; both p<0.01), whereas pacing from all sites increased QRS and total endocardial LV activation durations (p<0.01). The largest impairment of LV and RV contractility (dP/dtmax) and relaxation (dP/dtmin) was observed during RVA pacing (p= ns). Synchronous electrical activation patterns were observed on NCM during RVOT and LVA pacing. LVFW pacing was the only site that significantly increased tau values as compared to RAA pacing (approximately 25%), whereas LVA pacing elicited only slight increases (approximately 1%).
In swine with preserved ventricular conduction, in vivo pacing of the RVOT and LVA was associated with preserved, physiologically similar electrical activation sequences and LV function relative to RAA pacing. In contrast, RVA pacing caused widespread electrical dyssynchrony of the LV and prolonged activation durations, thereby impairing associated cardiac performance. Such insights into alternate site cardiac pacing, which employed the combination of high-resolution electrical mapping with real-time hemodynamic assessments, may further increase acute and long-term benefits in patients requiring permanent pacemaker support.
右心室(RV)起搏与心脏电和机械不同步异常有关,导致整体和局部心室泵功能受损。本研究旨在描述起搏部位对左心室(LV)激动模式及相关血流动力学表现的相对影响。
对10头麻醉猪进行急性起搏,这些猪配备了用于测量RV和LV压力、心内膜单极电图的非接触式标测(NCM)、体表心电图、主动脉血流和声学制微测量仪。双极心内膜起搏导线置于右心耳(RAA)、RV心尖(RVA)和RV流出道(RVOT),而双极心外膜导线置于LV游离壁(LVFW)和LV心尖(LVA)。
LVFW和RVA起搏引起的心室内电不同步(IVED)增加最大(分别为32.2±10 ms、21.7±4.1 ms;均p<0.01),而所有部位起搏均增加QRS和LV心内膜总激动持续时间(p<0.01)。在RVA起搏期间观察到LV和RV收缩性(dP/dtmax)和舒张性(dP/dtmin)的最大损害(p=无显著性差异)。在RVOT和LVA起搏期间,NCM上观察到同步电激动模式。与RAA起搏相比,LVFW起搏是唯一显著增加tau值的部位(约25%),而LVA起搏仅引起轻微增加(约1%)。
在心室传导正常的猪中,相对于RAA起搏,RVOT和LVA的体内起搏与保留的、生理上相似的电激动序列和LV功能相关。相比之下,RVA起搏导致LV广泛的电不同步和延长的激动持续时间,从而损害相关的心脏功能。这种对替代部位心脏起搏的认识,采用了高分辨率电标测与实时血流动力学评估相结合的方法,可能会进一步增加需要永久起搏器支持的患者的短期和长期获益。