UCD School of Medicine and Medical Science, Conway Institute of Biomolecular and Biomedical Research, Dublin, Ireland.
BJU Int. 2010 Mar;105(5):631-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08810.x. Epub 2009 Sep 3.
To assess the discrepancy between needle biopsy (NB) and radical prostatectomy (RP) Gleason score (GS) in Irish men, specifically the influence of the stratification of GS 4 + 3 on overall levels of agreement, levels of discrepancy and kappa coefficients, as the GS assigned to prostate cancer NBs affects clinical decision-making and influences future therapeutic strategies.
We reviewed retrospectively a database of the discrepancies between NB and RP Gleason grades (GG) from 2003 to 2008. All patients had clinically localized prostate cancer, and none had had neoadjuvant therapy. Grading of 206 NB specimens was compared with their corresponding RP specimens. The discrepancy rate between NB and RP GS was assessed for each combination of GG. Intermediate- (GS 7, defined as GS 3 + 4 alone vs GS 7) and high-grade (GS 4 + 3 and GS 8-10 vs GS 8-10) classifications were compared. The level of agreement and the kappa coefficient for each system was assessed.
In NB, GS 6 was most frequently diagnosed (53%); after RP, GS 3 + 4 was most frequent (36%). In 42% of cases the exact GG remained unchanged after RP, increasing to 48% for GS 6 and GS 3 + 4. Overall 42% of cases showed an increase in their GG. In GS 6 NBs, the rate of increase in the primary GG or increase in the GS was 52%. Biopsy GS 6 and 3 + 4 showed the highest levels of agreement between NB and RP. Low-grade prostate cancer on NB was upgraded in 52% of cases; high-grade prostatic adenocarcinoma was downgraded in 27-77% of cases depending on the grading system used.
Classification of high-grade prostate cancer as GS 4 + 3 and GS 8-10 results in higher levels of agreement between NB and RP GS. Reliable identification of well differentiated prostatic adenocarcinoma in NB specimens represents an ongoing diagnostic challenge, necessitating careful preoperative consideration of the definitive grade of a patient's disease.
评估爱尔兰男性中经皮穿刺活检(NB)和根治性前列腺切除术(RP)之间 Gleason 评分(GS)的差异,特别是 GS 4+3 分层对整体一致性水平、差异水平和kappa 系数的影响,因为分配给前列腺癌 NB 的 GS 会影响临床决策并影响未来的治疗策略。
我们回顾性地分析了 2003 年至 2008 年 NB 和 RP Gleason 分级(GG)之间差异的数据库。所有患者均患有临床局限性前列腺癌,且均未接受新辅助治疗。比较了 206 例 NB 标本的分级与相应的 RP 标本。评估了 GG 每种组合之间 NB 和 RP GS 差异率。比较了中等级别(GS 7,定义为 GS 3+4 单独与 GS 7 相比)和高级别(GS 4+3 和 GS 8-10 与 GS 8-10 相比)分类。评估了每个系统的一致性水平和 kappa 系数。
在 NB 中,最常诊断出 GS 6(53%);在 RP 后,最常见的是 GS 3+4(36%)。在 RP 后,42%的病例 GG 保持不变,GS 6 和 GS 3+4 的比例增加到 48%。总体而言,42%的病例 GG 增加。在 GS 6 NB 中,原发 GG 增加或 GS 增加的发生率为 52%。NB 中的 GS 6 和 3+4 显示出 NB 和 RP 之间最高的一致性水平。NB 中低级别前列腺癌在 52%的病例中升级;根据使用的分级系统,高级别前列腺腺癌在 27-77%的病例中降级。
将高级别前列腺癌分类为 GS 4+3 和 GS 8-10 可提高 NB 和 RP GS 之间的一致性水平。在 NB 标本中可靠地识别分化良好的前列腺腺癌仍然是一个持续存在的诊断挑战,需要术前仔细考虑患者疾病的明确分级。