• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

窝洞大小对乳牙近中玻璃离子修复术修复体存留率的影响。

Influence of the cavity-size on the survival rate of proximal ART restorations in primary molars.

作者信息

Kemoli Arthur Musakulu, van Amerongen Willem Evert

机构信息

Department of Paediatric Dentistry/Orthodontics University of Nairobi, Kenya.

出版信息

Int J Paediatr Dent. 2009 Nov;19(6):423-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-263X.2009.01013.x. Epub 2009 Sep 1.

DOI:10.1111/j.1365-263X.2009.01013.x
PMID:19732191
Abstract

AIM

To evaluate the influence of the size of proximal cavities on the survival rate of the atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) restorations.

DESIGN

A total of 804 children, aged 6-8 years, from a low socio-economic community, with an ART restorable proximal carious lesion in their primary molars, participated. Over a 3-week period, three 'experienced' and four 'inexperienced' operators randomly paired with four 'experienced' and four 'inexperienced' assistants, made the restorations at site using hand instruments. They randomly used Fuji IX, Ketac Molar Easymix and Ketac Molar Aplicap glass ionomer cements to restore the cavities, under randomly selected rubber dam and cotton roll isolation methods. The fillings were independently evaluated by nine trained and calibrated evaluators.

RESULTS

After 1 year, the survival rate of the fillings evaluated in the study was 44.8%. Irrespective of the other factors involved, restorations with the highest survival rate were of size between 2 and 3 mm (mesio-distal, bucco-lingual, and depth) or volumes 10.0-19.9 mm(3) (Chi-square, P = 0.002, KM mean survival of 345 days).

CONCLUSIONS

While the survival rates for class II ART restorations were still low, the choice of medium-sized proximal cavities gave better survival rates for this technique.

摘要

目的

评估近中窝洞大小对非创伤性修复治疗(ART)修复体存留率的影响。

设计

来自低社会经济社区的804名6至8岁儿童参与研究,他们的乳磨牙存在可采用ART修复的近中龋损。在3周时间内,3名“经验丰富”和4名“经验不足”的操作者与4名“经验丰富”和4名“经验不足”的助手随机配对,使用手持器械在现场进行修复。他们随机使用富士IX、Ketac Molar Easymix和Ketac Molar Aplicap玻璃离子水门汀,在随机选择的橡皮障和棉卷隔湿方法下修复窝洞。充填物由9名经过培训且校准的评估者独立评估。

结果

1年后,本研究中评估的充填物存留率为44.8%。无论涉及的其他因素如何,存留率最高的修复体大小在2至3毫米之间(近远中、颊舌向和深度)或体积为10.0 - 19.9立方毫米(卡方检验,P = 0.002,KM平均存留时间为345天)。

结论

虽然II类ART修复体的存留率仍然较低,但选择中等大小的近中窝洞可使该技术获得更好的存留率。

相似文献

1
Influence of the cavity-size on the survival rate of proximal ART restorations in primary molars.窝洞大小对乳牙近中玻璃离子修复术修复体存留率的影响。
Int J Paediatr Dent. 2009 Nov;19(6):423-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-263X.2009.01013.x. Epub 2009 Sep 1.
2
Influence of the experience of operator and assistant on the survival rate of proximal ART restorations: two-year results.术者和助手经验对非创伤性修复治疗(ART)近端修复体存留率的影响:两年结果
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2009 Dec;10(4):227-32. doi: 10.1007/BF03262687.
3
Short communication: Influence of different isolation methods on the survival of proximal ART restorations in primary molars after two years.简短通讯:不同隔离方法对乳磨牙近端ART修复体两年后存留情况的影响
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2010 Jun;11(3):136-9. doi: 10.1007/BF03262729.
4
Two years survival rate of Class II ART restorations in primary molars using two ways to avoid saliva contamination.Class II 型 ART 修复体在乳磨牙中两年的存活率,采用两种方法避免唾液污染。
Int J Paediatr Dent. 2010 Nov;20(6):419-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-263X.2010.01060.x.
5
Survival of glass ionomer restorations placed in primary molars using atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) and conventional cavity preparations: 2-year results.使用非创伤性修复治疗(ART)和传统窝洞预备方法在乳磨牙中放置玻璃离子修复体的存留情况:2年结果。
Int Dent J. 2004 Feb;54(1):42-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1875-595x.2004.tb00251.x.
6
Comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional cavity preparations for glass-ionomer restorations in primary molars: one-year results.乳牙玻璃离子修复中无创伤性修复治疗与传统窝洞预备的比较:一年期结果。
Quintessence Int. 2002 Jan;33(1):17-21.
7
The effect of GIC-brand on the survival rate of proximal-ART restorations.GIC 品牌对近中 -ART 修复体存活率的影响。
Int J Paediatr Dent. 2013 Jul;23(4):251-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-263X.2012.01259.x. Epub 2012 Aug 14.
8
Two-year survival rates of proximal atraumatic restorative treatment restorations in relation to glass ionomer cements and Postrestoration meals consumed.与玻璃离子水门汀及修复后饮食相关的非创伤性修复治疗近中端修复体的两年生存率。
Pediatr Dent. 2011 May-Jun;33(3):246-51.
9
One year Survival Rate of Ketac Molar versus Vitro Molar for Occlusoproximal ART Restorations: a RCT.用于咬合面-邻面非创伤性修复治疗(ART)修复的Ketac Molar与Vitro Molar的一年生存率:一项随机对照试验。
Braz Oral Res. 2017 Nov 6;31:e88. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2017.vol31.0088.
10
Two-year survival of glass ionomer sealants placed as part of proximal atraumatic restorative treatment restorations.作为邻面无创修复治疗修复体一部分放置的玻璃离子封闭剂的两年生存率。
East Afr Med J. 2010 Sep;87(9):375-81.

引用本文的文献

1
Survival percentages of atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) restorations and sealants in posterior teeth: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.后牙非创伤性修复治疗(ART)修复体和窝沟封闭剂的存留率:一项更新的系统评价和Meta分析
Clin Oral Investig. 2018 Nov;22(8):2703-2725. doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2625-5. Epub 2018 Sep 19.
2
Glass carbomer and compomer for ART restorations: 3-year results of a randomized clinical trial.玻璃碳基聚合物和复合体用于 ART 修复:一项随机临床试验的 3 年结果。
Clin Oral Investig. 2019 Apr;23(4):1761-1770. doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2593-9. Epub 2018 Aug 31.
3
In vitro and in vivo evaluations of glass-ionomer cement containing chlorhexidine for Atraumatic Restorative Treatment.
含氯己定的玻璃离子水门汀用于非创伤性修复治疗的体外和体内评价
J Appl Oral Sci. 2017 Sep-Oct;25(5):541-550. doi: 10.1590/1678-7757-2016-0195.
4
The 3.5-year survival rates of primary molars treated according to three treatment protocols: a controlled clinical trial.根据三种治疗方案治疗的乳磨牙的3.5年生存率:一项对照临床试验。
Clin Oral Investig. 2014 May;18(4):1061-1069. doi: 10.1007/s00784-013-1077-1. Epub 2013 Aug 13.
5
Longevity of composite restorations in patients with early childhood caries (ECC).
Clin Oral Investig. 2014 Apr;18(3):775-82. doi: 10.1007/s00784-013-1043-y. Epub 2013 Jul 20.
6
A preliminary clinical trial using flowable glass-ionomer cement as a liner in proximal-ART restorations: the operator effect.采用流动性玻璃离子水门汀作为近中-ART 修复体衬层的初步临床研究:操作者效应。
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2013 May 1;18(3):e529-32. doi: 10.4317/medoral.18497.
7
Survival rate of approximal-ART restorations using a two-layer technique for glass ionomer insertion.使用双层技术进行玻璃离子体嵌体的近中 ART 修复体的存活率。
Clin Oral Investig. 2013 Sep;17(7):1745-50. doi: 10.1007/s00784-012-0859-1. Epub 2012 Oct 11.
8
Effects of oral hygiene, residual caries and cervical Marginal-gaps on the survival of proximal atraumatic restorative treatment approach restorations.口腔卫生、残留龋和颈部边缘间隙对邻面无创修复治疗方法修复体存留率的影响。
Contemp Clin Dent. 2011 Oct;2(4):318-23. doi: 10.4103/0976-237X.91796.
9
Two decades of ART: improving on success through further research.二十年抗逆转录病毒疗法(ART):通过进一步研究提高成功率。
J Appl Oral Sci. 2009;17 Suppl(spe):122-33. doi: 10.1590/s1678-77572009000700020.
10
ART class II restoration loss in primary molars: re-restoration or not?乳牙ART II类修复体的丧失:是否重新修复?
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2010 Oct;11(5):228-31. doi: 10.1007/BF03262752.