更新：格林兰和罗宾斯（1986年）。可识别性、可交换性与流行病学混杂因素。
Update: Greenland and Robins (1986). Identifiability, exchangeability and epidemiological confounding.
作者信息
Maldonado George
机构信息
University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis, USA.
出版信息
Epidemiol Perspect Innov. 2009 Sep 4;6:3. doi: 10.1186/1742-5573-6-3.
Abstract
We are pleased to publish an update to "Identifiabiliity, exchangeability and epidemiological confounding" (IEEC) by Sander Greenland and James Robins, originally published in 1986 in the International Journal of Epidemiology. This is the first in a series of updates to classic epidemiologic-methods papers that EP&I has commissioned.
摘要
我们很高兴发布桑德·格林兰和詹姆斯·罗宾斯所著的《可识别性、可交换性与流行病学混杂因素》（IEEC）的更新版。该文最初于1986年发表在《国际流行病学杂志》上。这是《流行病学与感染》（EP&I）委托撰写的一系列经典流行病学方法论文更新中的第一篇。
相似文献
1
Update: Greenland and Robins (1986). Identifiability, exchangeability and epidemiological confounding.更新：格林兰和罗宾斯（1986年）。可识别性、可交换性与流行病学混杂因素。
Epidemiol Perspect Innov. 2009 Sep 4;6:3. doi: 10.1186/1742-5573-6-3.
2
Identifiability, exchangeability and confounding revisited.再谈可识别性、可交换性与混杂因素
Epidemiol Perspect Innov. 2009 Sep 4;6:4. doi: 10.1186/1742-5573-6-4.
3
Identifiability, exchangeability, and epidemiological confounding.可识别性、可交换性与流行病学混杂因素。
Int J Epidemiol. 1986 Sep;15(3):413-9. doi: 10.1093/ije/15.3.413.
4
The mockery that confounds better treatment of confounding in epidemiology: The change in estimate fallacy.流行病学中混淆因素的更好处理所面临的嘲弄：估计值变化谬误。
Glob Epidemiol. 2024 Sep 26;8:100166. doi: 10.1016/j.gloepi.2024.100166. eCollection 2024 Dec.
5
The role of counterfactual theory in causal reasoning.反事实理论在因果推理中的作用。
Ann Epidemiol. 2016 Oct;26(10):681-682. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2016.08.017. Epub 2016 Aug 31.
6
An easy approach to the Robins-Breslow-Greenland variance estimator.一种计算罗宾斯-布雷斯洛-格陵兰方差估计量的简便方法。
Epidemiol Perspect Innov. 2005 Sep 26;2:9. doi: 10.1186/1742-5573-2-9.
7
Re: "Accepting the limits of ecologic studies: Drs. Greenland and Robins reply to Drs. Piantadosi and Cohen".主题：“接受生态学研究的局限性：格林兰博士和罗宾斯博士回应皮亚托迪西博士和科恩博士”
Am J Epidemiol. 1995 Feb 1;141(3):277-8. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a117437.
8
Covariate balance for no confounding in the sufficient-cause model.协变量在充分病因模型中无混杂的均衡。
Ann Epidemiol. 2018 Jan;28(1):48-53.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2017.11.005. Epub 2017 Nov 23.
9
Ectopic pregnancy in Greenland. An epidemiological study.格陵兰的异位妊娠。一项流行病学研究。
Arctic Med Res. 1990 Jan;49(1):43-7.
10
Directed acyclic graphs (DAGs): an aid to assess confounding in dental research.有向无环图（DAGs）：评估牙科研究中混杂因素的一种辅助工具。
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2002 Dec;30(6):399-404. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0528.2002.00008.x.
引用本文的文献
1
Confounding control in a nonexperimental study of STAR*D data: logistic regression balanced covariates better than boosted CART.STAR*D 数据的非实验性研究中的混杂控制：逻辑回归平衡协变量优于提升 CART。
Ann Epidemiol. 2013 Apr;23(4):204-9. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2013.01.004. Epub 2013 Feb 15.
2
Investigating differences in treatment effect estimates between propensity score matching and weighting: a demonstration using STAR*D trial data.探讨倾向评分匹配和加权法治疗效果估计值之间的差异：一项使用 STAR*D 试验数据的演示。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2013 Feb;22(2):138-44. doi: 10.1002/pds.3396. Epub 2012 Dec 28.
本文引用的文献
1
Identifiability, exchangeability and confounding revisited.再谈可识别性、可交换性与混杂因素
Epidemiol Perspect Innov. 2009 Sep 4;6:4. doi: 10.1186/1742-5573-6-4.
2
Identifiability, exchangeability, and epidemiological confounding.可识别性、可交换性与流行病学混杂因素。
Int J Epidemiol. 1986 Sep;15(3):413-9. doi: 10.1093/ije/15.3.413.
Zotero 插件