• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Long-term results of eversion carotid endarterectomy.

作者信息

Black James H, Ricotta Joseph J, Jones Calvin E

机构信息

Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.

出版信息

Ann Vasc Surg. 2010 Jan;24(1):92-9. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2009.06.019. Epub 2009 Sep 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.avsg.2009.06.019
PMID:19734006
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is supported by level 1 evidence as the standard of care for symptomatic and asymptomatic extracranial carotid stenosis. Eversion CEA (ECEA) has been proposed as an acceptable alternative to the standard bifurcation endarterectomy in many patients; however, long-term follow-up of this technique has not been reported. This study was designed to analyze the long-term durability of ECEA in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients.

METHODS

From June 1989 to March 2002, 534 ECEAs were performed on 485 patients (60% male, 44% symptomatic, reoperative 1.0%). Preoperative characteristics, operative findings, and postoperative duplex data were entered prospectively into database. These data were retrospectively reviewed to determine the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) within 30 days of surgery, late survival, and the late incidence of ipsilateral carotid disease. Variables associated with carotid restenosis were subjected to statistical analysis.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up period was 8.86 years (95% confidence interval [CI] 6.56-9.16, median 6.6). MACEs occurred in 19 patients (3.8%), including 13 strokes (2.6%) and six deaths (1.2%). MACEs when added to surgical site-related complications yielded a <30-day complication rate of 5.3%. Survival by life-table analysis at 5 and 10 years was 75.2% and 50.1%, respectively. Recurrent stenosis of the ECEA site was noted in 20 patients (4.1%), with a mean time to recurrence of 4.4 years (95% CI 2.92-6.07, median 4.0). Statistical analyses failed to implicate any specific patient risk factor, symptomatic presentation, presence of hyperlipidemia or statin use, internal carotid artery diameter, or presence of residual disease as predictive of recurrent stenosis.

CONCLUSION

The current study represents the longest follow-up to date of patients undergoing ECEA. The findings of this study support ECEA as a safe and durable long-term treatment for extracranial carotid disease presenting with or without acute symptomatology.

摘要

相似文献

1
Long-term results of eversion carotid endarterectomy.
Ann Vasc Surg. 2010 Jan;24(1):92-9. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2009.06.019. Epub 2009 Sep 5.
2
Gender-based outcomes after eversion carotid endarterectomy from 1998 to 2009.1998 年至 2009 年外翻颈动脉内膜切除术的性别结局。
J Vasc Surg. 2012 Feb;55(2):338-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.08.018. Epub 2011 Nov 21.
3
[Eversion carotid endarterectomy: evaluation of results after changing the operation technique].
Cas Lek Cesk. 2011;150(1):41-3.
4
Durability of eversion carotid endarterectomy.外翻颈动脉内膜切除术的耐久性。
J Vasc Surg. 2014 May;59(5):1274-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2013.11.088. Epub 2014 Jan 11.
5
Carotid angioplasty and stenting is safe and effective for treatment of recurrent stenosis after eversion endarterectomy.颈动脉血管成形术和支架置入术对于外翻式内膜切除术术后复发性狭窄的治疗是安全有效的。
J Vasc Surg. 2014 Sep;60(3):645-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.03.288. Epub 2014 May 1.
6
Restenosis after eversion vs patch closure carotid endarterectomy.外翻与补片修补颈动脉内膜切除术后再狭窄
J Vasc Surg. 2007 Jul;46(1):41-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.02.055.
7
Long-term survival and stroke-free survival after eversion carotid endarterectomy for asymptomatic severe carotid stenosis.无症状重度颈动脉狭窄外翻式颈动脉内膜切除术的长期生存及无卒中生存情况
J Vasc Surg. 2007 Aug;46(2):265-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.03.043. Epub 2007 Jun 27.
8
The detrimental impact of silent cerebral infarcts on asymptomatic carotid endarterectomy outcome.无症状性脑梗死对无症状颈动脉内膜切除术预后的不利影响。
J Vasc Surg. 2016 Jul;64(1):15-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2015.12.049. Epub 2016 Mar 9.
9
Bypass and other modified reconstruction techniques for 'challenging' carotid cases: A comparison with conventional endarterectomy.旁路和其他改良重建技术治疗“挑战性”颈动脉病例:与传统颈动脉内膜切除术的比较。
Vascular. 2024 Oct;32(5):1044-1054. doi: 10.1177/17085381231174946. Epub 2023 May 12.
10
Standard duplex criteria overestimate the degree of stenosis after eversion carotid endarterectomy.标准双功超声标准高估了外翻式颈动脉内膜切除术术后的狭窄程度。
J Vasc Surg. 2015 Jun;61(6):1457-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2015.01.039. Epub 2015 Mar 7.