• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[Eversion carotid endarterectomy: evaluation of results after changing the operation technique].

作者信息

Janousek Libor, Marada Tomás, Chlupác Jaroslav, Lipár Kvetoslav, Baláz Peter, Rokosný Slavomír, Matia Ivan, Adamec Milos

机构信息

Institut klinické a experimentální medicíny Praha, Klinika transplantacní chirurgie.

出版信息

Cas Lek Cesk. 2011;150(1):41-3.

PMID:21404487
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Stroke is the third most common cause of mortality, and carotid artery stenosis causes up to 30% of all ischemic strokes. Eversion CEA (ECEA) has been proposed as an acceptable alternative to the standard bifurcation endarterectomy in many patients. This study was designed to analyze the long-term durability of ECEA in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. Data were retrospectively reviewed to determine the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) within 30 days of surgery, late survival, and the incidence of restenosis.

METHODS AND RESULTS

From January 1999 to June 2010, 344 ECEAs were performed on 324 patients (34% female, 38% symptomatic). The mean follow-up period was 30 months.

CONCLUSIONS

MACEs occurred in 28 patients (8.6%). The overall incidence of stroke or death after ECEA was 1.7% and 0.9% at discharge. The overall incidence of stoke or death after CEA was 4.3% and 21% (14 strokes, 69 deaths, 8 of which were stroke-related). The overall occurrence of any restenosis (> 50%) after CEA was 4.3% (14 of 324 procedures).

摘要

相似文献

1
[Eversion carotid endarterectomy: evaluation of results after changing the operation technique].
Cas Lek Cesk. 2011;150(1):41-3.
2
Eversion carotid endarterectomy: a technical alternative that may obviate patch closure in women.外翻式颈动脉内膜切除术:一种可能避免女性患者使用补片修补的技术替代方案。
Cardiovasc Surg. 2003 Oct;11(5):347-52. doi: 10.1016/S0967-2109(03)00076-0.
3
Eversion carotid endarterectomy versus best medical treatment in symptomatic patients with near total internal carotid occlusion: a prospective nonrandomized trial.症状性颈内动脉几乎完全闭塞患者行外翻式颈动脉内膜切除术与最佳药物治疗的前瞻性非随机试验
Ann Vasc Surg. 2010 Feb;24(2):185-9. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2009.07.010. Epub 2009 Nov 8.
4
Long-term results of eversion carotid endarterectomy.
Ann Vasc Surg. 2010 Jan;24(1):92-9. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2009.06.019. Epub 2009 Sep 5.
5
[Eversion carotid endarterectomy for carotid stenosis].[外翻式颈动脉内膜切除术治疗颈动脉狭窄]
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2005 Apr 1;43(7):409-11.
6
Eversion carotid endarterectomy generates fewer microemboli than standard carotid endarterectomy.外翻式颈动脉内膜切除术产生的微栓子比标准颈动脉内膜切除术少。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2000 Aug;20(2):153-7. doi: 10.1053/ejvs.1999.1072.
7
[Carotid endarterectomy by eversion and reimplantation. Techniques and results].[外翻及再植入式颈动脉内膜切除术。技术与结果]
J Mal Vasc. 1997 Jul;22(3):168-72.
8
Long-term restenosis rate of eversion endarterectomy on the internal carotid artery.颈内动脉外翻内膜切除术的长期再狭窄率。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2004 May;27(5):537-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2004.02.017.
9
[A comparative study on medium-long term results of conventional and eversion endarterectomy in management of carotid artery stenosis: a meta-analysis].[传统与外翻式动脉内膜切除术治疗颈动脉狭窄的中长期疗效比较研究:一项荟萃分析]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2014 Feb 25;94(7):510-6.
10
Carotid-subclavian arterial reconstruction: concomitant ipsilateral carotid endarterectomy increases risk of perioperative stroke.颈动脉-锁骨下动脉重建术:同期进行同侧颈动脉内膜切除术会增加围手术期卒中风险。
Surgery. 2007 Sep;142(3):393-7. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2007.03.014.