Notarius Catherine F, Morris Beverley L, Floras John S
Division of Cardiology, University Health Network and Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2009 Nov;297(5):H1760-6. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00012.2009. Epub 2009 Sep 4.
Many heart failure (HF) patients exhibit paradoxical forearm vasodilation when central blood volume is reduced by lower body negative pressure (LBNP). We tested the hypothesis that this response results from reflex sympathetic withdrawal. We recorded simultaneously forearm blood flow, muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA), and plasma norepinephrine (PNE) during four random applications of LBNP, -5, -10, -20, and -40 mmHg, in 12 men with HF (mean left ventricular ejection fraction = 24 + or - 2%) and 10 healthy, normal, age-matched men (N). Compared with N, MSNA burst frequency (P = 0.001) and PNE (P = 0.005) were significantly higher in the HF group, both at rest and during LBNP. As anticipated in N, LBNP -40 mmHg significantly increased MSNA (+14.2 + or - 2.5 bursts/min; P < 0.05) and PNE (+0.83 + or - 0.22 nmol/l; P < 0.05) and decreased forearm vascular conductance (FVC) (-11.7 + or - 3.2 ml.min(-1).mmHg(-1); P < 0.05). In the HF group, LBNP elicited similar increases in MSNA (+11.5 + or - 2.0; P < 0.05) and PNE (+0.85 + or - 0.12; P < 0.05), without affecting FVC significantly (-4.1 + or - 2.4; P = 0.01 vs. N, interaction P = 0.03). However, within the HF group, responses were bimodal: LBNP -40 mmHg increased MSNA in all subjects (P < 0.001), yet the six patients with nonischemic or dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) exhibited significant vasoconstriction (decrease in FVC; P = 0.001), whereas the six patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) exhibited significant vasodilation (increase in FVC; P < 0.02 vs. DCM and N; interaction P = 0.02). Cold pressor testing increased MSNA and decreased FVC in ICM (n = 4). Thus paradoxical forearm vasodilator responses to LBNP in HF are not mediated by reflex sympathetic withdrawal. ICM and DCM patients differ qualitatively in their vascular responses to hypotensive LBNP.
许多心力衰竭(HF)患者在通过下体负压(LBNP)降低中心血容量时会出现矛盾的前臂血管舒张。我们检验了这一反应是由反射性交感神经抑制引起的假说。我们在12名HF男性患者(平均左心室射血分数 = 24 ± 2%)和10名年龄匹配的健康正常男性(N)中,在随机施加的四种LBNP水平,即-5、-10、-20和-40 mmHg时,同时记录了前臂血流量、肌肉交感神经活动(MSNA)和血浆去甲肾上腺素(PNE)。与N组相比,HF组在静息和LBNP期间,MSNA爆发频率(P = 0.001)和PNE(P = 0.005)均显著更高。正如在N组中预期的那样,-40 mmHg的LBNP显著增加了MSNA(+14.2 ± 2.5次/分钟;P < 0.05)和PNE(+0.83 ± 0.22 nmol/l;P < 0.05),并降低了前臂血管传导性(FVC)(-11.7 ± 3.2 ml·min⁻¹·mmHg⁻¹;P < 0.05)。在HF组中,LBNP引起了类似的MSNA(+11.5 ± 2.0;P < 0.05)和PNE(+0.85 ± 0.12;P < 0.05)增加,但对FVC没有显著影响(-4.1 ± 2.4;与N组相比P = 0.01,交互作用P = 0.03)。然而,在HF组内,反应是双峰的:-40 mmHg的LBNP使所有受试者的MSNA增加(P < 0.001),但6名非缺血性或扩张型心肌病(DCM)患者表现出显著的血管收缩(FVC降低;P = 0.001),而6名缺血性心肌病(ICM)患者表现出显著的血管舒张(FVC增加;与DCM和N组相比P < 0.02;交互作用P = 0.02)。冷加压试验使ICM患者(n = 4)的MSNA增加,FVC降低。因此,HF患者对LBNP的矛盾性前臂血管舒张反应不是由反射性交感神经抑制介导的。ICM和DCM患者对降压性LBNP的血管反应在性质上有所不同。