Quant Eudocia C, Jeste Shafali S, Muni Rajeev H, Cape Alison V, Bhussar Manveen K, Peleg Anton Y
Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
BMJ. 2009 Sep 7;339:b3354. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b3354.
To determine whether steroids plus antivirals provide a better degree of facial muscle recovery in patients with Bell's palsy than steroids alone.
Meta-analysis.
PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for studies published in all languages from 1984 to January 2009. Additional studies were identified from cited references. Selection criteria Randomised controlled trials that compared steroids with the combination of steroids and antivirals for the treatment of Bell's palsy were included in this study. At least one month of follow-up and a primary end point of at least partial facial muscle recovery, as defined by a House-Brackmann grade of at least 2 (complete palsy is designated a grade of 6) or an equivalent score on an alternative recognised scoring system, were required. Review methods Two authors independently reviewed studies for methodological quality, treatment regimens, duration of symptoms before treatment, length of follow-up, and outcomes. Odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were calculated and pooled using a random effects model.
Six trials were included, a total of 1145 patients; 574 patients received steroids alone and 571 patients received steroids and antivirals. The pooled odds ratio for facial muscle recovery showed no benefit of steroids plus antivirals compared with steroids alone (odds ratio 1.50, 95% confidence interval 0.83 to 2.69; P=0.18). A one study removed analysis showed that the highest quality studies had the greatest effect on the lack of difference between study arms shown by the odds ratio. Subgroup analyses assessing causes of heterogeneity defined a priori (time from symptom onset to treatment, length of follow-up, and type of antiviral studied) showed no benefit of antivirals in addition to that provided by steroids.
Antivirals did not provide an added benefit in achieving at least partial facial muscle recovery compared with steroids alone in patients with Bell's palsy. This study does not, therefore, support the routine use of antivirals in Bell's palsy. Future studies should use improved herpes virus diagnostics and newer antivirals to assess whether combination therapy benefits patients with more severe facial paralysis at study entry.
确定在贝尔面瘫患者中,类固醇联合抗病毒药物是否比单独使用类固醇能带来更好程度的面部肌肉恢复。
荟萃分析。
检索了PubMed、Embase、科学网和Cochrane对照试验中央注册库,以查找1984年至2009年1月以各种语言发表的研究。通过引用参考文献确定了其他研究。选择标准:本研究纳入了比较类固醇与类固醇联合抗病毒药物治疗贝尔面瘫的随机对照试验。要求至少随访1个月,且主要终点为至少部分面部肌肉恢复,按照House - Brackmann分级至少为2级(完全性面瘫指定为6级)或在另一种公认的评分系统上有等效分数。综述方法:两位作者独立审查研究的方法学质量、治疗方案、治疗前症状持续时间、随访长度和结果。计算并使用随机效应模型汇总95%置信区间的比值比。
纳入6项试验,共1145例患者;574例患者单独接受类固醇治疗,571例患者接受类固醇和抗病毒药物治疗。面部肌肉恢复的汇总比值比显示,与单独使用类固醇相比,类固醇联合抗病毒药物没有益处(比值比1.50,95%置信区间0.83至2.69;P = 0.18)。一项剔除研究的分析表明,质量最高的研究对决比值比显示的研究组间无差异影响最大。评估先验定义的异质性原因(从症状发作到治疗的时间、随访长度和所研究抗病毒药物的类型)的亚组分析表明,除类固醇提供的益处外,抗病毒药物没有额外益处。
与单独使用类固醇相比,抗病毒药物在贝尔面瘫患者中实现至少部分面部肌肉恢复方面没有提供额外益处。因此,本研究不支持在贝尔面瘫中常规使用抗病毒药物。未来的研究应使用改进的疱疹病毒诊断方法和更新的抗病毒药物,以评估联合治疗是否对研究入组时面部麻痹更严重的患者有益。