Morimoto Susana, Vieira Glauco Fioranelli, Agra Carlos Martins, Sesma Newton, Gil Carlos
Department of Restorative Dentistry, Dental School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Braz Dent J. 2009;20(2):143-8. doi: 10.1590/s0103-64402009000200010.
This study evaluated the fracture strength of teeth restored with bonded ceramic inlays and overlays compared to sound teeth. Thirty sound human maxillary premolars were assigned to 3 groups: 1- sound/unprepared (control); 2- inlays and 3- overlays. The inlay cavity design was Class II MOD preparation with an occlusal width of 1/2 of the intercuspal distance. The overlay cavity design was similar to that of the inlay group, except for buccal and palatal cusp coverage The inlay and overlay groups were restored with feldspathic porcelain bonded with adhesive cement. The specimens were subjected to a compressive load until fracture. Data were analyzed statistically by the Kruskal-Wallis test at 5% significance level. The fracture strength means (KN) were: Sound/unprepared group = 1.17, Inlay group= 1.17, and Overlay group = 1.14. There were no statistically significant differences (p>0.05) among the groups. For inlays and overlays, the predominant fracture mode involved fragments of one cusp (70% of simple fractures). The fracture strength of teeth restored with inlay and overlay ceramics with cusp coverage was similar to that of intact teeth.
本研究评估了与完整牙齿相比,用粘结陶瓷嵌体和高嵌体修复的牙齿的断裂强度。将30颗完整的人类上颌前磨牙分为3组:1-完整/未预备(对照组);2-嵌体组和3-高嵌体组。嵌体洞型设计为II类MOD预备,咬合宽度为牙尖间距的1/2。高嵌体洞型设计与嵌体组相似,但覆盖颊尖和腭尖。嵌体组和高嵌体组用与粘结剂粘结的长石质瓷修复。对标本施加压缩载荷直至断裂。数据采用Kruskal-Wallis检验进行统计学分析,显著性水平为5%。断裂强度均值(KN)分别为:完整/未预备组=1.17,嵌体组=1.17,高嵌体组=1.14。各组之间无统计学显著差异(p>0.05)。对于嵌体和高嵌体,主要的断裂模式是一个牙尖的碎片(70%的简单骨折)。有牙尖覆盖的嵌体和高嵌体陶瓷修复的牙齿的断裂强度与完整牙齿相似。