Tavarez Rudys Rodolfo de Jesus, Firoozmand Leily Macedo, Silva Mônica Barros, Malheiros Adriana Santos, Bandéca Matheus Coelho
Professor, Department of Post-Graduation in Dentistry, CEUMA University, São Luis, Maranhao, Brazil.
Dental Student, Department of Prosthodontics, CEUMA University, São Luis Brazil.
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2014 Jan 1;15(1):56-60. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1487.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the mode of fracture and resistance of partial ceramic restorations of posterior teeth.
Thirty healthy upper premolars were selected and divided into three groups (n = 10): Group 1- control, healthy unrestored teeth, group 2-teeth restored with ceramic fragments; and group 3-teeth restored with ceramic overlays. The restorations were manufactured with feldspathic ceramic and cemented with RelyX ARC resin cement. After being stored in distilled water for 7 days, the teeth were subjected to axial compression mechanical testing with a universal testing machine. Force was applied to the long axis of the tooth at a speed of 0.5 mm/min until fracture. The data were analyzed with one-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (5%). The mode of fracture was scored according to the degree of involvement of the tooth structure and the type of restoration.
A significant difference (p < 0.05) was showed between groups 2 (1155 N) and 3 (846.6 N), but there was no significant difference between group 1 and the other groups (1046 N), More extensive fractures were prevalent in the healthy teeth group (Group 1), which had no occlusal coverage; less severe fractures were found in groups 2 and 3.
We conclude that teeth restored with ceramic fragments may offer greater resistance to fractures compared to teeth that have overlay restorations.
本研究旨在评估后牙部分陶瓷修复体的骨折模式和抗力。
选取30颗健康的上颌前磨牙,分为三组(n = 10):第1组为对照组,即健康未修复的牙齿;第2组为用陶瓷碎片修复的牙齿;第3组为用陶瓷覆盖层修复的牙齿。修复体采用长石质陶瓷制作,并用RelyX ARC树脂水门汀粘结。在蒸馏水中储存7天后,使用万能试验机对牙齿进行轴向压缩力学测试。以0.5 mm/min的速度沿牙齿长轴施加力直至骨折。数据采用单因素方差分析和Tukey检验(5%)进行分析。根据牙齿结构的受累程度和修复体类型对骨折模式进行评分。
第2组(1155 N)和第3组(846.6 N)之间存在显著差异(p < 0.05),但第1组与其他组(1046 N)之间无显著差异。在没有咬合覆盖的健康牙齿组(第1组)中,更广泛的骨折更为普遍;在第2组和第3组中发现的骨折不太严重。
我们得出结论,与采用覆盖层修复的牙齿相比,用陶瓷碎片修复的牙齿可能对骨折具有更大的抵抗力。