Department of Psychology, University of New Orleans, New Orleans, LA 70148, USA.
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2010 Apr;32(4):380-7. doi: 10.1080/13803390903066881. Epub 2009 Sep 8.
Classification accuracy for the detection of malingered neurocognitive dysfunction (MND) in mild traumatic brain injury (TBI) is examined for two selected measures from the Conners' Continuous Performance Test-II (CPT-II) using criterion-groups validation. Individual and joint classification accuracies are presented for Omissions and Hit Reaction Time Standard Error across a range of scores comparing mild TBI malingering (n = 27), mild TBI not-malingering (n = 31), and moderate-to-severe (M/S) TBI not-malingering (n = 24) groups. At cutoffs associated with at least 95% specificity in both mild and M/S TBI, sensitivity to MND in mild TBI was 30% for Omissions, 41% for Hit Reaction Time Standard Error, and 44% using both indicators. These results support the use of the CPT-II as a reliable indicator for the detection of malingering in TBI when used as part of a comprehensive diagnostic system.
使用标准组验证,检查了康纳斯连续执行测试-II(CPT-II)中的两个选定指标对轻度创伤性脑损伤(TBI)中伪装的神经认知功能障碍(MND)的检测的分类准确性。对于遗漏和命中反应时间标准误差,在比较轻度 TBI 伪装(n = 27)、轻度 TBI 不伪装(n = 31)和中重度(M/S)TBI 不伪装(n = 24)组的一系列分数上,分别呈现了个体和联合分类准确性。在与轻度和 M/S TBI 中至少 95%特异性相关的切点处,遗漏对轻度 TBI 中 MND 的敏感性为 30%,命中反应时间标准误差为 41%,使用这两个指标的敏感性为 44%。这些结果支持将 CPT-II 用作 TBI 中伪装检测的可靠指标,当它作为综合诊断系统的一部分使用时。