New Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Heart. 2010 Jan;96(1):27-9. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2009.170183. Epub 2009 Sep 10.
To compare out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OOHCA) characteristics in white and South Asian populations within Greater London.
Data for OOHCAs were extracted from 1 April 2003 to 31 March 2007. Primary study variables included age, gender, ethnicity, response times from 999 call to ambulance arrival, initial cardiac rhythm, whether bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation was provided before arrival of the London Ambulance Service (LAS) NHS Trust crew, whether the arrest was witnessed (bystander or LAS crew) and hospital outcome, including survival to hospital admission and discharge.
Of 13 013 OOHCAs of presumed cardiac cause, 3161 (24.3%) had ethnicity codes assigned. These comprised 63.1% (n = 1995) white and 5.8% (n = 183) South Asian people, with the remainder from other backgrounds. White patients were on average 5 years older than South Asians (69.5 vs 64.6, p<0.005). Response time (7.48 min vs 7.46 min), bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (34.4% vs 29.7%), initial cardiac rhythm (29.5% vs 30.4%) and survival to admission (22.2% vs 22.5%) and discharge (8.7% vs 8.9%) were comparable between the two ethnic groups. South Asians were slightly more likely to have a witnessed an OOHCA than their white counterparts (OR = 1.1, 95% CI 1.0 to 1.2).
The quality of care provided was comparable between white and South Asian populations. The data support the emerging view that South Asians' high mortality from coronary heart disease reflects higher incidence rather than higher case fatality. South Asians had an OOHCA at a significantly younger age. The study demonstrates the importance of ethnic coding within the emergency services.
比较大伦敦地区白人和南亚人群的院外心脏骤停(OOHCA)特征。
从 2003 年 4 月 1 日至 2007 年 3 月 31 日提取 OOHCA 数据。主要研究变量包括年龄、性别、种族、从 999 呼叫到救护车到达的反应时间、初始心搏节律、在伦敦救护车服务(LAS)国民保健服务信托工作人员到达之前是否有旁观者心肺复苏、是否有旁观者或 LAS 工作人员见证以及医院结局,包括存活至入院和出院。
在 13013 例疑似心源性 OOHCA 中,有 3161 例(24.3%)有种族代码。这些包括 63.1%(n=1995)白人患者和 5.8%(n=183)南亚人患者,其余为其他背景。白人患者比南亚人患者平均年长 5 岁(69.5 岁比 64.6 岁,p<0.005)。反应时间(7.48 分钟比 7.46 分钟)、旁观者心肺复苏(34.4%比 29.7%)、初始心搏节律(29.5%比 30.4%)和入院存活率(22.2%比 22.5%)以及出院存活率(8.7%比 8.9%)在两组之间无差异。南亚人发生 OOHCA 时旁观者目击的可能性略高于白人(OR=1.1,95%CI 1.0 至 1.2)。
两组人群接受的护理质量相似。数据支持这样一种观点,即南亚人冠心病死亡率较高反映的是发病率较高,而不是病死率较高。南亚人发生 OOHCA 的年龄明显更小。该研究表明,在紧急服务中进行种族编码的重要性。